Another ridiculous decision

[goldmom]

Not surprised that your view is "tough luck kid" for those born into poverty or circumstance that causes them to go hungry. Typical of the MAGA crowd.

LOL/SMH You know you’re better off just sticking to this emoji 🤣
My view is far from “tough luck kid” but I’m not at all surprised you’d try to paint it as such.

The child is the innocent here. They didn’t get a vote in favor of being here. No ability to say “yeah I’ll be happy to have those two as my birth parents”. There’s some real POS who should not be parents. Just ask your state CPS.

 

[goldmom]

I always knew mom was a really moronic person, now, I just think she’s a really bad person.

Am I to assume you’re referring to me?
You “always knew” I was a moron and now you “think” I’m a bad person?
You know nothing…absolutely nothing.

 

[hawkbirch]

There are summer programs where the kids are given lunch. At least in my locale.
And surely you recall when schools were closed for Covid there were emergency programs in almost all school districts nationwide where parents could pick up a packaged lunch in a drive thru setup at no charge. Some school communities even gave lunches to parents.

BTW benefits like SSI and food stamps go year round and are not tied to the school calendar.

Tell me something…I’m curious…is there ever a point where a parent is responsible for feeding their own child?

Of course. The difference is you think kids should starve if their parents aren’t your definition of responsible and I think that’s one of the more heartless of the heartless positions I’ve seen you take in here.

LOL/SMH You know you’re better off just sticking to this emoji 🤣
My view is far from “tough luck kid” but I’m not at all surprised you’d try to paint it as such.

The child is the innocent here. They didn’t get a vote in favor of being here. No ability to say “yeah I’ll be happy to have those two as my birth parents”. There’s some real POS who should not be parents. Just ask your state CPS.

and yet you advocate for the innocent kid to starve because their irresponsible POS should be responsible. Nice.

 

[goldmom]

Of course. The difference is you think kids should starve if their parents aren’t your definition of responsible and I think that’s one of the more heartless of the heartless positions I’ve seen you take in here.

and yet you advocate for the innocent kid to starve because their irresponsible POS should be responsible. Nice.

Apparently you have reading comprehension challenges. I would never advocate for any child to go hungry. Ever. Children are not to be punished/hungry/neglected because they have parents who fail to care for them.

Perhaps you’re not as proficient in the English language as your handlers need you to be? Hmm.

You’ve seen me take heartless positions in here? You’re lying and you know it. A different political opinion isn’t heartless. It’s just a different opinion. One you may not agree with. That’s your right.

And a certain stance on a social issue isn’t always a political opinion. However the relentless indoctrination from social media or leftist educators may have caused some confusion on your part.
Do you not understand that? You seem younger and perhaps a bit naive.

 

[ft254]

It's pretty clear that very few of you read the article.

..if the Biden administration...blah blah..they would invest at the state level in existing programs and infrastructure....! WTF does this mean? So, if you read the witch's words, you get the anticipated numb nuts crap.

Oh well, those vouchers gotta pay for something, right?

 

[hawkbirch]

Apparently you have reading comprehension challenges. I would never advocate for any child to go hungry. Ever. Children are not to be punished/hungry/neglected because they have parents who fail to care for them.

Perhaps you’re not as proficient in the English language as your handlers need you to be? Hmm.

You’ve seen me take heartless positions in here? You’re lying and you know it. A different political opinion isn’t heartless. It’s just a different opinion. One you may not agree with. That’s your right.

And a certain stance on a social issue isn’t always a political opinion. However the relentless indoctrination from social media or leftist educators may have caused some confusion on your part.
Do you not understand that? You seem younger and perhaps a bit naive.

then what is your point in responding to me? Are you in favor of this program or not? For someone who would “never advocate for a child to go hungry”, I would think you would be a supporter. Or maybe you’re one of those “supporters” who have to kick people while you are “helping” them. No, heartless was exactly the word I meant.

 

[goldmom]

then what is your point in responding to me? Are you in favor of this program or not? For someone who would “never advocate for a child to go hungry”, I would think you would be a supporter. Or maybe you’re one of those “supporters” who have to kick people while you are “helping” them. No, heartless was exactly the word I meant.

Heartless? Surely the chip inserted in you has you confusing me with Putin…
And now you’re on ignore which won’t bother you I’m sure - but at least your drivel will no longer bother me.

 

[runkpanole]

Heartless? Surely the chip inserted in you has you confusing me with Putin…
And now you’re on ignore which won’t bother you I’m sure - but at least your drivel will no longer bother me.

Sally Sensitive this morning

 

[hawkbirch]

Heartless? Surely the chip inserted in you has you confusing me with Putin…
And now you’re on ignore which won’t bother you I’m sure - but at least your drivel will no longer bother me.

You are finally correct about something. You ignoring me doesn't bother me even a little bit. I understand how constantly being wrong can get overwhelming for a gal. Thanks for relieving me of the duty to point it out to you in the future. I have no doubt the rest of HROT will carry on in my place.

 

[goldmom]

Sally Sensitive this morning

So that’s all you’ve got?
😏
I’ll say it again…you know nothing.

 

[RileyHawk]

LOL/SMH You know you’re better off just sticking to this emoji 🤣
My view is far from “tough luck kid” but I’m not at all surprised you’d try to paint it as such.

The child is the innocent here. They didn’t get a vote in favor of being here. No ability to say “yeah I’ll be happy to have those two as my birth parents”. There’s some real POS who should not be parents. Just ask your state CPS.

Your responses indicate otherwise as do your votes.

 

[runkpanole]

So that’s all you’ve got?
😏
I’ll say it again…you know nothing.

 

[auntie_fah]

I just think she’s a really bad person.

Goldy did defend someone tweeting nudes of their underage daughter.

 

[hawkbirch]

Goldy did defend someone tweeting nudes of their underage daughter.

I was trying to find that post so I could remind her that heartless was the nicest word I word I could choose.

 

[auntie_fah]

I was trying to find that post so I could remind her that heartless was the nicest word I word I could choose.

I got you

https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/thre...o-claudia-herself-who-is-16-years-old.346381/

 

[SocraticIshmael]

🤣

Goldie going full Fox while spewing her privilege all over this thread then blocking someone for calling her out on it is the true conservative snowflake trifecta.

It is almost too perfect.

 

[goldmom]

Damn.
Almost all the aholes gathered in one place. I must be batting 1000.