ADVERTISEMENT

California 'Skittles Ban' Advances to Governor's Desk, Here's What It Means for Consumers

Only on the issues they pick and choose, you are right.

There's a difference between exceeding the authority that Congress gives a rule-making agency and failing to take full advantage of the authority that Congress gives a rule-making agency.
 
I hope that California cost of living keeps pushing Californians to other states out west and they bring their politics with them
 
So we banned RD#3 in cosmetics but we allow it to be eaten.

200.gif
Thinks neutering kids in the name of "gender identity" is alright. Hates RD#3.

Sharpish.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fivecardstud14
If parents know their kid shouldn’t have red dyes then don’t buy em Skittles.
But so many of todays so-called “parents “ are dumber than dirt and suck at parenting the law has to step in.
Disclaimer: I don’t like Skittles and don’t care if they’re banned.
You have to be a writer for The Onion. There’s no other rationale with these types of posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chishawk1425
The difference between Skittles and cosmetics is crazy different.

No one pounds Skittles day after day after day....

But women put makeup on day after day after day....

The dose makes the poison....

You're right but this trash doesn't need to be an ingredient in our food chain. Just corporate ways to cut costs for profits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkNester
I love how so many just ignore the fact that prices go up on goods and services pretty consistently, over the years. As far as my wallet is concerned, we have had ongoing inflation as long as I can remember.

We won't be in a time of "inflation", for years, but prices go up anyway, and corporate CEOs keep getting paid more and more. Prices go up and rarely come back down. What's a candy bar cost today? That price goes up every few years, a quarter at a time.
My facepalm emoji was meant to imply sarcasm.
 
Doesn't one have to have voted for Drumpf to be a MAGAt, you drunk-driving slug?
Did you buy a license to Microsoft office to keep track of all of your user names or do you use google sheets?

It’s got to be almost a full time job keeping track all of them and the small changes in personalities you try to convey before you ultimately fall off the rails on the newest active handle.

What am I saying, you probably write it down on those 99 cent notebooks, that’s a lot of notebooks. Probably keep the same password for everything. That’s a lot of email addresses you create too, just seems like too much.
 
I'm a poor no Post membership.

It's referring to SAR levels of antenna emissions (not "radioactive", which is ionizing radiation), when the phone is carried in a pocket or direct skin contact. In those conditions, it exceeds max SAR limits.

When carrying in a jacket or bag, away from direct skin contact, it's fine.

You completely mitigate the problem wearing a bluetooth earbud and NOT putting the phone against your skin.

And, yes, this is an area I've done testing in at various test labs at their testing ranges (been a year or so since I put together a test protocol and the standards recently updated so I'm not 100% up to speed on the newest standard release)
 
Lol sure. If it has rat poison listed in the ingredients, I won’t eat it - like most halfway intelligent people.

So in your opinion, expecting people to know and understand the consequences of what they are putting in their or their child’s body is asinine? Lol okay.

If you don’t know that this crap is bad for you by now, you just don’t care

It wouldn't say rat poison. I'm actually not opposed to this ban. I didn't know that dye was so bad for you.
 
It's referring to SAR levels of antenna emissions (not "radioactive", which is ionizing radiation), when the phone is carried in a pocket or direct skin contact. In those conditions, it exceeds max SAR limits.

When carrying in a jacket or bag, away from direct skin contact, it's fine.

You completely mitigate the problem wearing a bluetooth earbud and NOT putting the phone against your skin.

And, yes, this is an area I've done testing in at various test labs at their testing ranges (been a year or so since I put together a test protocol and the standards recently updated so I'm not 100% up to speed on the newest standard release)

Isn’t the phone touching your skin when you are using it?
 
SO many things we can buy to put into our bodies. We’ve known they’re really bad for us for generations yet we still CHOOSE them, regardless of the possibility of damage to our bodies.
Tobacco, alcohol, drugs.
I don’t care for Skittles but I will worry far more about my grandkids accidentally ingesting fentanyl than getting some mini pack of Skittles this Halloween.
WTF? Just how in the world would this happen?
 
Isn’t the phone touching your skin when you are using it?
What part of "ear buds" is not understandable for you here?

Generally, the antenna (which is on the back of the phone) is not.
But I do not talk into my phone unless I don't have a hands-free earbud available, because I know I'm exposing myself to 1/100th or 1/1000th the same antenna radiation.
 
A very twisted person giving out candy that ain’t really candy.
I know it’s unlikely but would you say it couldn’t ever happen?
Ahh, the old wive's tale of Halloween poisoning again. The only documented death from Halloween candy poisoning was perpetrated by Ronald Clark O'Brien when he put a cyanide laced Pixy Stick in his own son's candy stash back in 1974.

You're probably more likely to be poisoned by the chef at your favorite restaurant, and far, far more likely by your spouse based on actual historical occurrences.
 
Ahh, the old wive's tale of Halloween poisoning again. The only documented death from Halloween candy poisoning was perpetrated by Ronald Clark O'Brien when he put a cyanide laced Pixy Stick in his own son's candy stash back in 1974.

You're probably more likely to be poisoned by the chef at your favorite restaurant, and far, far more likely by your spouse based on actual historical occurrences.

The LAST thing that people who drop a few G's on some coke want to do, is waste it on handing out with kids' Halloween candy. They wanna drop another hundy on some cheap hookers to have a Halloween Coke Orgy with them...
 
Ahh, the old wive's tale of Halloween poisoning again. The only documented death from Halloween candy poisoning was perpetrated by Ronald Clark O'Brien when he put a cyanide laced Pixy Stick in his own son's candy stash back in 1974.

You're probably more likely to be poisoned by the chef at your favorite restaurant, and far, far more likely by your spouse based on actual historical occurrences.
Agree it’s far more likely NOT to happen but nonetheless it would not be out of the question in the world we live in today.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT