The god of Spinoza...and Einstein - “the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator”I love calling Nature "God." It makes sense and feels better. God likes it, too.
The god of Spinoza...and Einstein - “the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator”I love calling Nature "God." It makes sense and feels better. God likes it, too.
As Carl Sagan said in the clip that (I'm guessing) few here actually watched, if you want to call the laws of nature "God" . . . go right ahead.
I mean we already have a perfectly good term for that, namely "the laws of nature" but "God" is easier to type.
Just remember that God, so defined, doesn't listen to prayers, grant salvation, or any of that nonsense.
If I accept the laws of nature as my Lord and Savior, do I get a prize?
@JRHawk2003 you're wasting your time. @tarheelbybirth doesn’t believe in a creator or intelligent design . However we agree on the complexity of life and the wonders of our planet being just the right distance to the sun , all the natural systems in place etc to conclude there was intelligence in the creation of life. The evidence is there. People just choose to ignore it .
Romans 1:20 describes it perfectly :
For His invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even His eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable
I have no idea what you mean by that. You can push the "God created the medium" angle...but that's just a god of the gaps - the idea that god exists in those areas of science we don't yet understand. That's a recipe for a god that gets smaller and smaller and smaller as science advances.
The Creation is also the Creator? "I and the Father are One."The god of Spinoza...and Einstein - “the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator”
Yet, you've been arguing that there is "meaning" in the current gaps in scientific knowledge. That this absence somehow demonstrates the reality of a god. Seek your meaning where you will. Don't pretend that your way is the only path. Kinda smacks of arrogance.Science will never give meaning to anything. If you don't seek meaning, its all you need.
What people simply don’t understand is the world we live in currently is ruled by Satan and his demons .
They are responsible for the world conditions we live in now .
1st John 5:19-We know that we originate with God, but the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one”
This is confirmed by the three temptations the Devil presented to Jesus after his baptism. The third offer tells us much
Matthew 4:8-Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. 9 And he said to him: “All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me”
One would ask how could Satan offer Jesus all the kingdoms of the world if he was not their ruler or owner.?
Fact is Satan is responsible for the cruelty and suffering we see on the earth today . He is also responsible for the God dishonoring lies we see within religion .
And, it would help, immensely, to refrain from literal interpretation. It's obvious that anyone can make anything fit, if you need it to fit. But, you can't expect others... and NEVER SHOULD YOU NEED OTHERS... to do it thesame way.Yet, you've been arguing that there is "meaning" in the current gaps in scientific knowledge. That this absence somehow demonstrates the reality of a god. Seek your meaning where you will. Don't pretend that your way is the only path. Kinda smacks of arrogance.
Dont straw man me.Yet, you've been arguing that there is "meaning" in the current gaps in scientific knowledge. That this absence somehow demonstrates the reality of a god. Seek your meaning where you will. Don't pretend that your way is the only path. Kinda smacks of arrogance.
LOL...there's no straw man there. Maybe you don't understand the term. You've done exactly what I posted.Dont straw man me
LOL...there's no straw man there. Maybe you don't understand the term. You've done exactly what I posted.
Your interpretation of Scripture is far different from mine. That's another hole for so-called Bible literalists. There is no "one right way" to interpret Scripture.
I read this and have a completely different understanding:
5 They do not know or understand; they wander in the darkness; all the foundations of the earth are shaken. 6I have said, ‘You are gods; you are all sons of the Most High.’ 7 But like mortals you will die, and like rulers you will fall.”…
John 10:34
Jesus replied, "Is it not written in your Law: 'I have said you are gods'?
You have your way, I have mine. God neither punishes, nor rewards. God is not a "He" in my understanding. My God doesn't have, or need, a penis.
I agree...it has absolutely not a thing to do with me. I really don't think you know what a straw man is.Its an annoying ****ing tactic and its tired.
The god of Spinoza...and Einstein - “the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator”
I'm interested... and, in my own way, I definitely "believe." But, it's MY WAY of believing. Religious followers also have a "church" and their peers (other followers) to contain with. The church needs it to be a certain way so it can continue to be relevant. And, if the church goes away, then the "other followers" are soon to follow. So, those kinds of believers have to represent their churches and their fellow believers in situations like this. It's a tall order. And, of course, they usually believe God is a super-human, MALE parental figure that lives up in the sky. The liturgy absolutely describes such a thing, if you read The Bible.Why do religious-types quote Biblical scripture to non believers and the uninterested? The absurdity of the cryptic text is among the reasons for disbelief.
I agree...it has absolutely not a thing to do with me. I really don't think you know what a straw man is.
First of all... I don't think He "was." I believe that he "IS."OK.
Who do you think He was?
A Middle Eastern rabbi with a, perhaps, revolutionary message whose teachings were subverted to control the masses. Render into Caesar his stuff...your reward will come after you die. Meanwhile, Caesar is living like...well...a caesar.Who do you think Jesus was?
Give it a shot. Once again, you did exactly as I posted.Doubling down on patronizing I see.
Sometimes maybe its best just to say nothing.
A Middle Eastern rabbi with a, perhaps, revolutionary message whose teachings were subverted to control the masses. Render into Caesar his stuff...your reward will come after you die. Meanwhile, Caesar is living like...well...a caesar.
Why does he have to be any of the three? That's odd.Do you think He was a liar, lunatic or God in human form?
Why does he have to be any of the three? That's odd.
I know this will be difficult, at first, because of what your church has taught you... but, aren't WE ALL "God in human form?" If we're not, then the whole basis of your religion is flawed.Do you think He was a liar, lunatic or God in human form?
You heard him talk? You are really older than I thought!Because He said that He was God.
So either He was either lying, crazy or telling the truth.
I know this will be difficult, at first, because of what your church has taught you... but, aren't WE ALL "God in human form?" If we're not, then the whole basis of your religion is flawed.
They crucified Jesus, but allowed him to be the only one who was God. And, that's as far as they're willing to go, in practice. But, IN SCRIPTURE, Jesus tells us that WE are just like HIM. You don't need the church to have what you already have!
You heard him talk? You are really older than I thought!
I say that I am God. I mean it! I say that YOU are God... and I MEAN THAT!
Am I lying? Am I crazy, or am I telling the truth?
Jesus did all of that and he caught-on, and then they killed him for it.
Well, yes, Christianity benefits from you believing that you're not God in human form. We are all God's creation. How that neuters being God in human form, don't know. But, I'm sure the church can explain it to you.No, we're not all God in human form, according to Christianity. Your religion is obviously different.
Well, yes, Christianity benefits from you believing that you're not God in human form. We are all God's creation. How that neuters being God in human form, don't know. But, I'm sure the church can explain it to you.
Jesus begged people to realize that if you can just open yourself to realize it, then you realize that You and God are the same thing. "I did it! And, you can do it, too!"
I can assure you, I'm not crazy.Of those options, I think you're crazy.
I have no doubt that is what you believe. The church has you right where they need you to be!No.
I'm not God. That's nonsense.
The church got to you. So, you need Jesus in a different way. Jesus said that if you couldn't believe it within yourself, do it through Him.No.
I'm not God. That's nonsense.
Are you sure? He's only said to make that claim in John - the last of the Gospels. The claim doesn't appear in ANY of the other Gospels nor in the writings of Paul...and you'd think he would write about that. Paul claiming that Jesus was God but separate from God would have been viewed as heresy before the Trinity was manufactured out of whole cloth.Because He said that He was God.
So either He was either lying, crazy or telling the truth.
The church got to you. So, you need Jesus in a different way. Jesus said that if you couldn't believe it within yourself, do it through Him.
Are you sure? He's only said to make that claim in John - the last of the Gospels. The claim doesn't appear in ANY of the other Gospels nor in the writings of Paul...and you'd think he would write about that. Paul claiming that Jesus was God but separate from God would have been viewed as heresy before the Trinity was manufactured out of whole cloth.
Maybe whoever wrote John was a lunatic or a liar.
You read Scripture through a papal lens, dude. You have no choice but to absorb it through a Catholic filter.No, I read Scripture myself.
You're profoundly ignorant of this topic.
So...according to the Bible, Lazarus was divine? Cool.Yes. I think Jesus proved His divinity by resurrecting from the dead.
His apostles were killed for that belief with 0 reason to lie.
You read Scripture through a papal lens, dude. You have no choice but to absorb it through a Catholic filter.
900+ people killed themselves and their children in service to a madman in Jonestown. Cults can make you do all kinds of strange, self-destructive things.Yes. I think Jesus proved His divinity by resurrecting from the dead.
His apostles were killed for that belief with 0 reason to lie.