Clarence Thomas
- Thread starter Joes Place
- Start date
It's the left politicizing the courts?
Clarence Thomas not happy SCOTUS shot down fringe election theory
Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court shouldn't have taken up the case on the fringe "independent state legislature" election theory to begin with.
www.businessinsider.com
Clarence's (& Alito's) Donors expected a different outcome here.It's the left politicizing the courts?
Clarence Thomas not happy SCOTUS shot down fringe election theory
Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court shouldn't have taken up the case on the fringe "independent state legislature" election theory to begin with.www.businessinsider.com
Those pricks are truly sucking at the nipple.
Who would now suggest or think that those “serving“ on the suuupreeeme court do so to better the common good?
My God, what a bunch of succulant assholes who serve monied interests.
The third rail is disgusting.
Not shocked if true. At this point I'd be shocked if Clarence paid for anything.
Don't expect Clarence to start recusing himself from cases involving Ginni and the coup.
Yep, looks like he's been compromised for a long time. Takes away the wondering how he supports what he does...
ProPublica reports:
Maybe worry about which of the nine justices actually interpret the Constitution the way it is written and not the way you wish it had been written, and this post would never have been started. The left just hates that we now have a majority of law/rule followers in the SCOTUS who replaced liberal legislators wearing black robes.
They are not lawful. Alito and Thomas are completely corrupt and on the take.
Must be nice to live in that bubble.
That is explicitly NOT what they are doing.
Look at you pretending that if we had found out George Soros paid for vacations for anyone on the court you’d be okay with.
The ONLY reason these rich folks do this, is because the ROI is so solid.
They will spend billions to eliminate their tax liabilities and legal liabilities (via Congresspersons and SC Justices), because they get hundreds of billions in tax breaks. And the rest of us have to pay higher taxes to make up the difference.
We aren't talking 10:1 ROIs here.
100:1 or 1000:1.
Last edited:
A good narrative to YOU to make YOU feel better about supporting traitors and insurrectionists but it is nothing more than that...
Again, every case that these people have ruled on needs to be thrown out and retried with new people. No decisions they have ever made can be considered legitimate or legal.
Clearly Thomas and Alito are some of the most unabashed whores to ever grace the Court and offer up these unwritten quid pro quos.
I'm sure another condescending letter of correction is incoming from the now tarnished Chief Justice poo-pooing this behavior as totally normal and morally allowable.
I'm sure another condescending letter of correction is incoming from the now tarnished Chief Justice poo-pooing this behavior as totally normal and morally allowable.
So seem to be okay with the Chinese paying for Hunter and Joes multiple houses?
Is somebody upset? Take a pill and meditate, I'm sure you'll get over it..........
You didnt go to Iowa. Admit it. You are a Tavern Hawk at best.
Well you didn’t have any issue with Ivanka’s China deals she made while serving, nor Jared’s $2B Saudi deal, so I don’t see what your problem is now.
Here we got a SC Justice bought and paid for and your brushing it off. Like I said. If we found receipts of Soros paying for Kagan’s vacations you’d be blowing a gasket.
You seem to be the one upset. All because you support the most corrupt and inept judges in history. And giving you the benefit of the doubt, I'm certain you've taken as many pills as you can find.
About time for a second:
The Constitution states that Justices "shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour." This means that the Justices hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from office by impeachment. Has a Justice ever been impeached? The only Justice to be impeached was Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.
Aren't we about to that point? If the guy had ANY decency he would resign, but he is a Republican so he lacks any ethics at all.
Ok...which one are you? What other handles are you going by?
It took me a while to see it. You slipped.
