But no degree in either "immunology" or "toxicology".
It's like you want your auto mechanic to recommend cardiac surgery methods for you....
Close friend pleading with me to not vaccinate our baby
- Thread starter HawkeyesAndCubs1023
- Start date
It's like you want your auto mechanic to recommend cardiac surgery methods for you....
"Esteemed"
But he has zero expertise in the toxicology or carcinogenicity of these vaccines....
Might wanna look up what an "oncologist" does for a living (Hint: it's not "research" on cancer causes).
I recently had a checkup with my internationally renowned doctor and he said I'm going to "live forever."
Why? My pizza and Chinese food diet is awful. My only exercise are power walks, stair push-ups and shower squats.
It must be the vaccines.
How, specifically, does FDA "rake in money" through the products they approve?
This is a question coming from someone who has worked with and met FDA reviewers on many occasions to get medical products approved. And who knows how those fee-schedules work, and that FDA actually will make MORE money by rejecting something and requiring a company to come back later with more data and "re-applying" for their drug or device.
How about you "splain" your level of experience on this topic here. In detail.
Well shit Joe ya got me. On top of knowing literally everything, you know all the inner workings of the FDA since you've "met with reviewers" and "know how those fee-schedules "work"".
And somehow you'd know they would (in every instance no less) make more money by rejecting something and having them re-apply. Any ideas about the kickbacks from the drugs that people purchase to cover the side effects had they approved said drug?
FDA does not get "kickbacks".
And "side effects" are required disclosures for drugs - if those are worse than the condition they treat, the drugs get pulled.
It's the thinking you know everything and there's no way the FDA is captured based on your small personal exposure that makes me laugh. How about you go tell Mary Holland that she's full of shit and you know that for a fact based on what little exposure you've had. I'd pay good money to witness and be able to keep record of that conversation.
When the bullshit stops is when I stop talking about it.
If RFK gets confirmed, it's about to get a whole lot more interesting.
That's your uninformed opinion, and therefore you've underestimated him.
I know how the FDA works, and where it collects fees.
Because I've worked for the companies who pay those fees.
If she is claiming that FDA is making "tons of money off approving drugs" or devices, she's full of shit.
It would be easy to produce a list of claims, statements and opinions expressed by the man that are not in touch with reality.
Therefor he does not have my respect as a thinking person.
I don't see where she singled out the FDA and said they're making "tons of money off approving drugs". Where do you see that?
Just for instance.
Do all the beliefs you had about what was happening during COVID match the reality you've come to realize today? Did you claim "conspiracy theorists" then too?
Claiming you know all the inner workings of the FDA based on your tiny exposure is entertaining.
Nope.
I kept adjusting based on evidence.
Schools stayed closed too long. Didn't find the initial shutdown unreasonable, or in effort to thwart overwhelming medical system. Vaccines proved to be tremendously useful in preventing severe disease that led to death. They don't do a great job in curbing spread over time. Great job on those. Lab leak is still a possibility, although we really don't have any great evidence either way on that one.
You do agree that vaccines saved quite a few lives right? You're not one of those are you?
I certainly understand far more about how it works than you do.
Many here talk about the benefits, so I feel like I don't really need to go there. Not many (here) talk about the costs. Some of you people desperately need some checks and balances in your life.
If the vaccine was causing significant widespread negative effects we'd know about it. There would be no way to keep something like that under wraps, especially with all kinds of people looking for for it.
Conclusions and relevance: In hospitalized preterm infants, the odds of apnea within 48 hours were higher after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations. The similar number and duration of apneic events and lack of serious adverse events suggest that current vaccination recommendations for hospitalized preterm infants are appropriate. Neonatal clinicians should continue providing evidence-based anticipatory guidance about postvaccination apnea risk.
I think you underestimate a lot. It's really not "under wraps" with so many people speaking about it, countless MDs and scientists. Several experts and people at the very top of our government health agencies are on record questioning vaccines. It's all been thoroughly explained. You're mistaken if you think it's not plausible. If you're stuck on accepting things at face value, then I'm sorry man, I can't do much for you.
I'm talking about the magnitude of negative events. Not that you couldn't find any.
The size of the problem.
The size would reveal itself as significant because enough people would present themselves as affected.
The available science does not allow to know magnitude. If that is true (which it is), why?
Last edited:
The fact that <15% of Americans are getting the updated injections says more about the negative side effects than you’ll ever hear from the Pharma pimps, errr, ‘regulators’ at the FDA.
Significantly higher risks of Long Covid in the unvaccinated, and increased risk with each new Covid exposure.
