Aren’t you the idiot who started two threads last week about being able to beat the shit out of people? You should get on antabuse.Republicans don’t give a **** about a child after they are born.
BigDumbHawk said he could kick my ass and I gave him the chance to do it. Then he chickened out and reported the thread and it was deleted.Aren’t you the idiot who started two threads last week about being able to beat the shit out of people? You should get on antabuse.
Bitch, should have shown up to the fight. Wow, he even reported the thread? “Tough guy” Trump supporter fo sho.BigDumbHawk said he could kick my ass and I gave him the chance to do it. Then he chickened out and reported the thread and it was deleted.
He’s a pussy like the rest of the MAGA crowd.
Here's another nugget to munch on, that I had not noticed.
I've generally tracked cases and deaths via the World-O-Meters site, as their data seems to be the most up-to-date. Johns Hopkins site is usually a little behind them, but similar - they're just not updating as quickly.
Let's compare numbers:
US Cases:
W-O-M: 2,496,816
JH: 2,411,413
CDC Demographics: 2,030,732
Either CDC is lagging, badly, or they do not have all the data on this site.
WOMs has approximately the CDC total as of 6/8/2020, or ~two weeks ago.
US Deaths:
W-O-M: 124,844
JH: 122,482
CDC Demographics: 95,352
CDC Provisonal: 107,997
Now, the demographics CDC page lists "only 99%" of data included age-related info, so there is a small adjustment here.
But the deaths counts on the CDC Provisional Page appear current as of about 6/2/2020 per the JH/WOM numbers.
The deaths counts on the CDC Demographics Page align as of around a full month ago, 5/21/2020
So, not only do we have no explanations on the 0-4 year olds, the data presented on those CDC sites is, at a minimum, about 2-4 weeks lagging.
I can see a week lag-time, if they update things on weekends or beginnings of weeks. But 2 weeks? 4 weeks?
And on a different CDC page, they list much more current numbers:
2,374,282 cases (4-5 days lagging WOM)
121,809 deaths (~6 days lagging WOM)
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html
(If I add the 0-4 plus the 5-17 case numbers off the Demographics page, they actually match reasonably well with the 109k from this CDC link)
0-4 yr old Demographic data still list:
1583 Deaths
26,844 Cases
I would say that this is about his only social interaction with other human beings.I have a real question for you, what do you get out of tracking all of this so close? Are you sharing your findings anywhere outside a Hawkeye message board? Doesn’t it wear on you mentally to spend so much time obsessing over these numbers?
I have a real question for you, what do you get out of tracking all of this so close? Are you sharing your findings anywhere outside a Hawkeye message board? Doesn’t it wear on you mentally to spend so much time obsessing over these numbers?
Lmao such a tough guyBigDumbHawk said he could kick my ass and I gave him the chance to do it. Then he chickened out and reported the thread and it was deleted.
He’s a pussy like the rest of the MAGA crowd.
I could say the same for you but I can back it up.Lmao such a tough guy
I’m past the point in life of fist fighting. But I’m not some dumb jock that took to many shots to the head.I could say the same for you but I can back it up.
Perhaps you’ve exceeded your bandwidth searching twitter and for graphs....and now the CDC Demographics site pulls up a completely blank page...
Perhaps errors corrected?
Updates?
https://www.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographics
My internet's been flaky all day, so maybe it's my end. But the page doesn't pull data up anymore.
Even in your prime you’d get your ass handed to you.I’m past the point in life of fist fighting. But I’m not some dumb jock that took to many shots to the head.
Wanna know what's really odd:
I pull up the Demographics page in a regular browser, and it pulls no graphs anymore.
If I do it in an "Incognito Window", it will pull up the graphs with %'s, but the actual numbers are no longer shown.
So, start your Conspiracy Theory Engines.
If anyone else can pull up the graphs, and find the actual case #'s and deaths #'s they used to have listed, please post if they update them.
Last values were listed as above in this thread; I think 26,844 and 1583.
Try a different browser. I have 5 browsers, and I use each for different purposes, because some have limitations. Some browsers no longer support Active X controls, which some webmasters still use to enable data downloads.Wanna know what's really odd:
I pull up the Demographics page in a regular browser, and it pulls no graphs anymore.
If I do it in an "Incognito Window", it will pull up the graphs with %'s, but the actual numbers are no longer shown.
So, start your Conspiracy Theory Engines.
If anyone else can pull up the graphs, and find the actual case #'s and deaths #'s they used to have listed, please post if they update them.
Last values were listed as above in this thread; I think 26,844 and 1583.
Try a different browser. I have 5 browsers, and I use each for different purposes, because some have limitations. Some browsers no longer support Active X controls, which some webmasters still use to enable data downloads.
Try a different browser. I have 5 browsers, and I use each for different purposes
Which 4 are the "porn" browsers?![]()
2,047,440 cases x 0.13 = 26,617 cases (Last actual was 26,884)
95,650 deaths x 0.017 = 1626 deaths (Last actual was 1583)
1626/26617 = 6.1% CFR
So, the data are "somewhat" still there, but they are cleared so that you cannot readily tell there are (purportedly) 1600 deaths in the 0-4 age group.
If this is a CDC "error", the data have been updated/changed >4 times now, and have ultimately been presented in a way that is less transparent.
Totally normal, right?
Very odd. Strange that the raw numbers have been removed. Also strange that nobody appears to be discussing this in the media.
GOOD NEWS though:
White babies are leadin' the charge in death percentages!
4
It's disturbing. The mf'er NEEDS to "report" on the negative aspects of this. He's conned himself into believing he's spearheading some kind of crusade.You’ve got issues
Site update:
2129850 cases @ 1.3% = 27688 Cases, 0-4 age group
99779 deaths @ 1.6% = 1596 Deaths, 0-4 age group
CFR: 5.8%
White children account for 53% of these deaths, or ~850
And still crickets from the media. It appears the only people who are aware of this in the entire country are on HROT.
I emailed a contact of mine who works in journalism and has done quite a bit of work covering the COVID story from the beginning. He's not a trained scientist, but is a voracious reader and is definitely up to speed on the science. I pointed out this CDC data to him and his response was, "I rarely say things with 100% certainty, but I will say with 100% certainty - that’s a mistake."
Now, he could definitely be wrong about this, but that's his take anyway. I hope he's right.
Racist post reportedGOOD NEWS though:
White babies are leadin' the charge in death percentages!
(half the deaths in the 0-4 age group are white)
Hispanic/Latino 21.9
American Indian / Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic 0.2
Asian, Non-Hispanic 6.4
Black, Non-Hispanic 16.9
Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic <0.1
White, Non-Hispanic 53.1
Multiple/Other, Non-Hispanic 1.4
What's the likelihood that CDC is running an ancient database on this, and has only a "two digit" age field when importing the data, so that centenarians are being mis-labeled in the infants/toddlers category? (e.g. someone 101 dying of Covid19 is importing as "01")
Interesting thought. Actually wouldnt shock me if this was true.