* The article itself is indeed a problem. You'll get no argument from me on that score.
* I think you may be making the mistake of thinking that the relationship between the Ames Trib and the ISU athletics department is similar to that between the Press-Citizen and the UI athletics department. Trust me; it ain't. The former is an adversarial relationship, while the latter is a co-dependency.
* You are buying into the rumors about Leath. You shouldn't.
* I don't know what you mean about Noskowiok. I don't recall anything Prohm said about him other than the boilerplate platitudes about him having problems and wishing him the best, etc.
* I don't know why you say the inner circle of ISU hoops is shaky. Really. Prohm appears to have surrounded himself with some outstanding assistants, including a carryover from the Hoiberg staff whom most people consider very important. Recruiting under the new staff so far looks terrific (although I never believe the crap I hear about recruits, no matter whose they are, until they show up eligible, out of jail, and at least half as talented as advertised).
* I would be stunned if some of the ISU players wouldn't rather be playing for Fred than for the new guy. By all accounts, Prohm is much more strict and demands more from them than Fred did. They were recruited by Fred and played for him, in some cases for four years. It's entirely possible there will be a mass revolt, the team will finish under .500, etc., etc., etc. We might even suck so badly that we lose to Iowa
I just haven't seen any reason to think that's any more likely in this case than in the usual change-of-staff situations.