Got it. So, it's other peoples' version/visions that you base it on. Not your own personal experience of them.
That's fine. Just wondered.
Yes.
I do know Priests that have done exorcists. I believe the dark side is real.
Got it. So, it's other peoples' version/visions that you base it on. Not your own personal experience of them.
That's fine. Just wondered.
Exorcisms.Yes.
I do know Priests that have done exorcists. I believe the dark side is real.
ruelike-woahh, post: 3907166, member: 13728"]Yeah well, Catholic Priests are the child molesters of the Christian world, so.. PICK A SIDE
Not true, actually.
Protestant sects have had abusers, too. Only 4% of Catholic priests were accused of abuse. That's less than the average guy on the street.
Celibacy doesn't cause pedophilia. Think about it; if you were sentenced to life in prison, would that turn you into a pedo?
I doubt it.
I'm sorry I didn't mean to accuse you of anything. I think a simple no to the thread question was the only needed answer. When someone tries to denounce religion it is for their benefit not the believers.I don't think you can say this with a straight face after the accusation you tossed my way. I'd say you care a good deal what others think. Probably because you have doubts and would like more validation and less challenges.
but how has it negatively affected your life?You really think it's as simple as people, "just going to church" when government officials are making policy based upon their religious beliefs.
I am not arguing. You can believe whatever you want. Unless I am wrong you were trying to convince someone religion was baseless. Once again I am not sure why you would concern yourself with someone's beliefs.We can flip this around pretty easy. When you try to argue your religious beliefs are real or that my arguments make you scared, you are exhibiting fear. Of the two of us, you're the only one that thinks there even is anything to be afraid of. You might want to find a mirror, you're talking to yourself in here.
So you're saying you'relooking at statistics and evidence to influence your conclusions? Weird. PICK A SIDE
You must be an old school Britney fan, because oops you did it again. You claim not to accuse, while you accuse and you claim not to care while seeming to care a whole lot. Try getting honest with yourself.I'm sorry I didn't mean to accuse you of anything. I think a simple no to the thread question was the only needed answer. When someone tries to denounce religion it is for their benefit not the believers.
The lib spin. I get it. Have a nice night.You must be an old school Britney fan, because oops you did it again. You claim not to accuse, while you accuse and you claim not to care while seeming to care a whole lot. Try getting honest with yourself.
No, it's entirely my own observation just about you, because I care. But I have no faith you get it yet. I plan to have a nice night, thank you. I hope you do the same.The lib spin. I get it. Have a nice night.
I thought I did pick a side
Ok, passive aggressive smiley faces aside I'm going to try and explain this to you. I used an example in your own church where you had to use nuance and facts to defend their position.
You called me out for being a fence sitter when it comes to faith and that I should have to pick a side.
For you, A + B = C
A = I believe in a God
B= The Catholic Church
C= Result of my faith through the Catholic Church
A + B = C
Very simple.
Except the world is not that simple, it never is. There are a bajillion different variables between A and B that you seem to choose to ignore because what.... faith? My Evangelical brother doesn't recognize Catholics as actual Christians. He can't stand your dogma.
That is someone within your own religion that believes in Jesus Christ who doesn't recognize your denomination within the same ****ing religion.
So I do my best to research what we can logically conclude about the world about us and base my opinions on that. I'm fluid, if the evidence for things change then I change. I read religious texts through the lens of the societies that wrore them, and I adjust my opinions accordingly.
Oh but I have to "pick a side" when you can't even agree on anything within YOUR OWN ****ING RELIGION.
But I'm the fence sitting dickhead. Give me a break with your superfluous Catholic bullshit. Go cover up another molestation of children, it's what you do best.
PICK A SIDE.
Ok, passive aggressive smiley faces aside I'm going to try and explain this to you. I used an example in your own church where you had to use nuance and facts to defend their position.
You called me out for being a fence sitter when it comes to faith and that I should have to pick a side.
For you, A + B = C
A = I believe in a God
B= The Catholic Church
C= Result of my faith through the Catholic Church
A + B = C
Very simple.
Except the world is not that simple, it never is. There are a bajillion different variables between A and B that you seem to choose to ignore because what.... faith? My Evangelical brother doesn't recognize Catholics as actual Christians. He can't stand your dogma.
That is someone within your own religion that believes in Jesus Christ who doesn't recognize your denomination within the same ****ing religion.
So I do my best to research what we can logically conclude about the world about us and base my opinions on that. I'm fluid, if the evidence for things change then I change. I read religious texts through the lens of the societies that wrore them, and I adjust my opinions accordingly.
Oh but I have to "pick a side" when you can't even agree on anything within YOUR OWN ****ING RELIGION.
But I'm the fence sitting dickhead. Give me a break with your superfluous Catholic bullshit. Go cover up another molestation of children, it's what you do best.
PICK A SIDE.
Haha, relax, brah. You're so pissed.
I stated that I consider agnostics to be fence sitters because they won't declare if they believe or disbelieve in God.
Believe or don't believe or whatever you want. It's 100% your prerogative.
Oh and most theologians would agree that your brother is a major ignoramus. But that's his choice.
I have to give atheists credit for choosing a side, unlike
agnostics....
It's cool, keep supporting an organization that covered up child molestation. Believe or don't believe whatever you want, it's 100% your prerogative.
PICK A SIDE.
Would one of you please fix your deplorable use of the quote function. TiA.
That's the thread topic, isn't it? To believe or not to believe?I am not arguing. You can believe whatever you want. Unless I am wrong you were trying to convince someone religion was baseless. Once again I am not sure why you would concern yourself with someone's beliefs.
I'll behave like a good Christian and forgive you.That's why I didn't quote the last one, that might have been my fault when I changed a post earlier. That shit is a complete eye sore. I was having a hard time following the same thread that I'm invested in.
I'll behave like a good Christian and forgive you.
Well let's not get crazy.It all comes full circle. We're all good Christians in this thread.
Well let's not get crazy.
That's why I didn't quote the last one, that might have been my fault when I changed a post earlier. That shit is a complete eye sore. I was having a hard time following the same thread that I'm invested in.
Not true, actually.
Protestant sects have had abusers, too. Only 4% of Catholic priests were accused of abuse. That's less than the average guy on the street.
Impossible to know the real % of pedo priests as the Catholic church has been involved in the active cover up for so long. I'm not suggesting that it's a crazy % like 50 or anything. Just saying that you can't possibly throw a number at it and expect to be taken seriously.
No doubt. I'm not a Catholic Priest/religion basher. One of my uncles was a priest. Great guy. Great sense of humor. He would tell us Catholic priest jokes when he came to visit for the holidays.Fair points.
I still believe it happens much more often in schools, for example, than in the Church. But that is no excuse. The vast majority of the abuse took place before 1970; it was a different culture. Abuse was swept under the rug, both in religious institutions and secular society. It was not taken as seriously as it is today.
Sexual abuse happens in every part of society, unfortunately. It's not like the Catholic Church was a hot bed of it, according to the John Jay Report.
http://www.newsweek.com/priests-commit-no-more-abuse-other-males-70625
The pedo Priests were acting in complete opposition to Church teachings from the past 2,000 years. May they burn in hell forever.
No doubt. I'm not a Catholic Priest/religion basher. One of my uncles was a priest. Great guy. Great sense of humor. He would tell us Catholic priest jokes when he came to visit for the holidays.
Fair points.
I still believe it happens much more often in schools, for example, than in the Church. But that is no excuse. The vast majority of the abuse took place before 1970; America had a different culture. Abuse was swept under the rug, both in religious institutions and secular society. It was not taken as seriously as it is today.
Sexual abuse happens in every part of society, unfortunately. It's not like the Catholic Church was a hot bed of it, according to the John Jay Report.
http://www.newsweek.com/priests-commit-no-more-abuse-other-males-70625
The pedo Priests were acting in complete opposition to Church teachings from the past 2,000 years. May they burn in hell forever.
Oh c'mon. Yeah it somehow stopped after 1970, give me a break. The pedo priests acted in opposition of "The Church" yet "The Church" covered up and absorbed their crimes for those same 2,000 years. Only we aren't idiots anymore and can nail them to the cross, pun intended, for their shit.
So who is worse, the pedo's, or the enablers who allowed the pedo's to keep functioning in society while also preaching about their "goodness".
Keep the tithes coming in so we can live in our Golden City. The Catholic Church is a business, it's why they've adjusted their social viewpoints to align with modern Western values. Smart business decision on their part, but complete bullshit from the spiritual one.
You are so uneducated on this subject, you Agnostic fence sitter.
The Catholic Church is not a business, again, it's the #1 charitable organization in our country. That's a fact.
The vast majority of Priests, Nuns and Bishops are better people than you are.
Keep sniping from the fence...all you believe in is Wu-Tang.
I grew up in the Catholic Church, and you know what here it is, I don't talk about this but whatever. I was molested as a young man by a Catholic Priest. AKA, "Father"
And that **** fled to Oregon and there is no justice for me because of the organization that is the Catholic Church. So **** off about your perceptions of me and what I've been through.
1970 doesn't mean crap to me because I was born in '85 and got abused by an organization that has covered this shit up thousands of times since then. The stories are endless.
The vast majority of Priests, Nuns, and Bishops are better than me? **** right off with that shit.
Now you know why I'm "mad bro." Because they ****ing aren't. They are people, simple as that and they are capable of inhumane shit. The difference is they hide their flaws behind the Catholic Church and they were more than capable of protecting them to save face. Yeah, shove them off to another Parish. They're just confused, demons are influencing their thoughts.
Cool, the Catholic Church has dropped some cash, good for them. Doesn't ****ing help me or the thousands of others who have been taken advantage of as children and then covered up so I can get no justice.
Enjoy being a part of that shit organization.
I'm sorry to hear that. Did you ever call the police?
I was 8, not exactly mature enough to pick the phone up and dial 911.
Yeah, sorry.
It's fine, it really is and I kind of flew off the handle there because it is a sensitive subject for me (obviously). I apologize for that.
Piety and perceived Piety drives me nuts. God, to me, is an esoteric concept and when people with a literal interpretation of what is and what is not come at me with their perceptions, well.. I get a bit annoyed.
I've dealt with the ramifications of organized religion and what it turns people into. Maybe that isn't exactly a true statement, those people are who they are, except they found an avenue to keep hurting people with an umbrella over their heads. In my case, it's "The Church."
I don't claim to be atheist, agnostic, or whatever. Labels are division, and labels tend to make people pick a side and defend the indefensible.
I don't take part in that. I try my best to address every issue on its own merit, within the society that I was born into. That's all I can do.