ADVERTISEMENT

Dubuque sheriff's department hires new deputy previously arrested for sexual assault

I haven’t ready anything that said how old he was. Shoot I don’t even know what the laws are on consent in Iowa. She said he gave her the drink. She alleged that. He said she fabricated the entire thing. We don’t KNOW what happened because charges were dropped. The obvious reason they were dropped is because they couldn’t prove anything. He didn’t even take a plea. They were just dropped.

Again, are we going to condemn someone just because they were criminally charged? We don’t know what happened. Is he lying? Maybe but he passed a polygraph.
Anybody who knows anything about polygraphs knows they’re about as accurate as his horoscope.
 
Using drugs in the past doesn’t disqualify you from police service. Lying about using drugs will disqualify you. I have no idea if they lied about that.

There is some scientific basis for polygraph use but of course they can be fooled.
You said this:
I do not of course. And I have no familiarity with anyone in this situation. Many of you are also ignoring the fact that he passed a polygraph.
And I'm simply telling you that just because he passed a polygraph means nothing. Cops are generally pretty good liars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ping72
btw, the incident occurred in the home of his father. Who was a cop at the time, before he became a county supervisor.
Oh, and it appears his brother is a cop too?
 
I don’t know how old he was. I don’t know. If we are going to start condemning people for trying to get laid as teenagers I’m in trouble. Again, if he was 25 it’s a creepy thing. If he was 17 it’s not. I can’t fond how old he was.

Did you drink with girls in high school to try and get laid? Have you ever had sex with someone after either of you had too much to drink? I mean that happens every weekend in Iowa City. Maybe that’s rape. But he wasn’t tried for that. He wasn’t convicted. If every person who was drinking and had sex was charged there would be a lot of people in prison.
You just going to gloss over the fact that she was unconscious and woke up to him sexually assaulting her?

I would be fine with putting every guy who does that in prison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IIowaFarmBoy
The other crazy thing about defending this guy is that in Iowa you can FIRE someone who is an at-will employee for any reason. If you don't like their clothing style, you can fire them and there is nothing to prevent it.

Yet we have a guy in here arguing that drug use, past arrests, underage drinking should NOT be disqualfying for merely hiring someone to ENFORCE LAWS.

Just nutz, but BAU for HBOT.
 
Have you ever actually been in a position to hire someone?

I have. And when you run a background check and it comes back with an arrest, one looks at the circumstances and determines if this is the type of person you would want to be associated with your organization. In this case, it is a LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER who - at the very least broke several laws including underage consumption of alcohol, giving alcohol to a minor and illegal drug use.

The fact you just gloss over this and think it's OK for him to be a cop is wild.
What if she agreed later that she made it up? You don’t know. He apparently has lived a clean life since. I don’t see how we can condemn someone based on a charge.

And I was in charge of hiring. I run background checks on students all the time. Am I supposed to kick every student out of paramedic school because they were charged with a crime? We have women in pretty vulnerable positions as well
 
I don’t know how old he was. I don’t know. If we are going to start condemning people for trying to get laid as teenagers I’m in trouble. Again, if he was 25 it’s a creepy thing. If he was 17 it’s not. I can’t fond how old he was.

Did you drink with girls in high school to try and get laid? Have you ever had sex with someone after either of you had too much to drink? I mean that happens every weekend in Iowa City. Maybe that’s rape. But he wasn’t tried for that. He wasn’t convicted. If every person who was drinking and had sex was charged there would be a lot of people in prison.
You snuck Nyquil into drinks in an effort to get laid? What a scumbag.
 
What if she agreed later that she made it up? You don’t know. He apparently has lived a clean life since. I don’t see how we can condemn someone based on a charge.

And I was in charge of hiring. I run background checks on students all the time. Am I supposed to kick every student out of paramedic school because they were charged with a crime? We have women in pretty vulnerable positions as well
In a story I just heard it appears she has recanted her claims against him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theiacowtipper
What if she agreed later that she made it up? You don’t know. He apparently has lived a clean life since. I don’t see how we can condemn someone based on a charge.

And I was in charge of hiring. I run background checks on students all the time. Am I supposed to kick every student out of paramedic school because they were charged with a crime? We have women in pretty vulnerable positions as well
LOL fine. you hire the little creep.

I sure as shit wouldn't.

Hiring isn't a court - you go by your gut and pick people you feel would be helpful, accountable members of a team.

You really want this dude on your team?
 
You just going to gloss over the fact that she was unconscious and woke up to him sexually assaulting her?

I would be fine with putting every guy who does that in prison.
Again, then charge him and convict him. Charge him and convict him. I want people who do those things off the streets. CHARGE HIM AMD CONVICT HIM THEN. Why are we condemning people and persecuting people when the crime can’t be proven. What’s next, oh the cops showed up at his house, let’s shun him completely.
 
The other crazy thing about defending this guy is that in Iowa you can FIRE someone who is an at-will employee for any reason. If you don't like their clothing style, you can fire them and there is nothing to prevent it.

Yet we have a guy in here arguing that drug use, past arrests, underage drinking should NOT be disqualfying for merely hiring someone to ENFORCE LAWS.

Just nutz, but BAU for HBOT.
FFS. Grow up. You don’t think cops drank underage, smoked a joint, did all kinds of crazy stuff when they were younger? Don’t be naive. And police officers do not serve at will in Iowa. He wasn’t officially past probation but let’s be clear they are not at will.
 
In a story I just heard it appears she has recanted her claims against him.
If this is true do all of you feel like pieces of shit for calling this guy out. If this is true does your rush to judgement hurt a little bit? Do you feel a little worse about yourself?
 
So 17 apparently had sex with a 16 year old. That isn’t a crime. Giving her an intoxicant, including NyQuil would be. She said he did, he said he didn’t. He wasn’t convicted.

From Torbee's link in post #9 it says he was 16 at the time of the incident.
 
Again, then charge him and convict him. Charge him and convict him. I want people who do those things off the streets. CHARGE HIM AMD CONVICT HIM THEN. Why are we condemning people and persecuting people when the crime can’t be proven. What’s next, oh the cops showed up at his house, let’s shun him completely.
I think you have some sort of weird delusion that you think the justice system in this country is equitable.

It might not be fair, but 99% of the time I will assume that charges dropped against a white male with a parent in a position of power is guilty.
 
LOL fine. you hire the little creep.

I sure as shit wouldn't.

Hiring isn't a court - you go by your gut and pick people you feel would be helpful, accountable members of a team.

You really want this dude on your team?
I didn’t interview him. I didn’t hire him. It’s not my department. I have no idea if I’d hire him or not. I do know I wouldn’t rely on an old criminal charge to make that judgement for him. I certainly wouldn’t judge him as a "creep" just because he has an old charge.

I DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. Investigate it. Do your due process. If he’s the best candidate hire him.
 
I think you have some sort of weird delusion that you think the justice system in this country is equitable.

It might not be fair, but 99% of the time I will assume that charges dropped against a white male with a parent in a position of power is guilty.
Well by all means feel free to judge your fellow man based off incomplete evidence.
 
No. No. No.

Any other questions?
So you’re saying if it comes out that she said it didn’t happen, you’re still ok with him being disqualified for a position he is otherwise disqualified for? You’d be ok with that.
 
I didn’t interview him. I didn’t hire him. It’s not my department. I have no idea if I’d hire him or not. I do know I wouldn’t rely on an old criminal charge to make that judgement for him. I certainly wouldn’t judge him as a "creep" just because he has an old charge.

I DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. Investigate it. Do your due process. If he’s the best candidate hire him.
You are aware he filed a lawsuit saying he was wrongly charged and it was dismissed, right?

This is a very obvious case of "where there's smoke, there is fire"

He has been busted for underage drinking, open container, giving a minor alcohol, drinking underage and is alleged to have given a 16-year old girl a NyQuil-spiked drink and having sex with her.

And you think it's "unfair" that he isn't GIVEN a job. Note, not FIRED from a job, just not given one.

GTFO
 
So you’re saying if it comes out that she said it didn’t happen, you’re still ok with him being disqualified for a position he is otherwise disqualified for? You’d be ok with that.
Yes. He shouldn't even be hired because his father is a county supervisor and his brother is already a cop.
Talk about potential problems...
Even Ferentz and McCaffery would say...no, that's too much. You can't hire all your kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torbee
Yes. He shouldn't even be hired because his father is a county supervisor and his brother is already a cop.
Talk about potential problems...
Even Ferentz and McCaffery would say...no, that's too much. You can't hire all your kids.
So he can be an officer in Davenport? Or is the nepotism only an excuse?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pinehawk
If this is true do all of you feel like pieces of shit for calling this guy out. If this is true does your rush to judgement hurt a little bit? Do you feel a little worse about yourself?
paul-rudd.gif
 
So he can be an officer in Davenport? Or is the nepotism only an excuse?
I would bet he would never be hired in Davenport. He was hired because of his family and local connections. Who were willing to ignore the red flags. He should go apply in Davenport...see how that goes.
 
You are aware he filed a lawsuit saying he was wrongly charged and it was dismissed, right?

This is a very obvious case of "where there's smoke, there is fire"

He has been busted for underage drinking, open container, giving a minor alcohol, drinking underage and is alleged to have given a 16-year old girl a NyQuil-spiked drink and having sex with her.

And you think it's "unfair" that he isn't GIVEN a job. Note, not FIRED from a job, just not given one.

GTFO
It was dismissed due to immunity issues. You can admit it. That’s fine. You’re judging him based solely off the charge. You don’t want to have trials. You want people to be convicted in the court of public opinion. Let’s just judge everyone based off what the newspaper says.

There are thousands of police officers out there with alcohol arrests. Thousands. That’s what he’s been convicted of.
 
Nobody is saying this guy should be denied employment everywhere, but there should be certain standards for law enforcement.

Would I want this guy serving in my community? No.

...but what if u get invited to the underage girls parties, yo....???
 
Nobody is saying this guy should be denied employment everywhere, but there should be certain standards for law enforcement.

Would I want this guy serving in my community? No.
Even if she came out and said she made it up? Unbelievable.
 
It was dismissed due to immunity issues. You can admit it. That’s fine. You’re judging him based solely off the charge. You don’t want to have trials. You want people to be convicted in the court of public opinion. Let’s just judge everyone based off what the newspaper says.

There are thousands of police officers out there with alcohol arrests. Thousands. That’s what he’s been convicted of.
You are embarassing yourself at this point.

This is about a hiring decision.

I have chosen not to hire someone based on bad vibes or just not trusting them. If someone comes in with a background of booze and assault and drug arrests, their name goes directly on the NOPE file, period the end.

If you aren't just playing devils advocate and truly are tasked with selecting candidates to be future paramedics, I have grave concerns.
 
So you’re saying if it comes out that she said it didn’t happen, you’re still ok with him being disqualified for a position he is otherwise disqualified for? You’d be ok with that.
Yes. It’s job-dependent; but for a law-enforcement officer, I think it’s obvious he has a history of poor decision-making. I would like to think that would disqualify him for this position even without a conviction.

If he wants to go work for the DMV or drive a snowplow for the county or something… go for it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT