Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Second best major party candidate in a decade, maybe 2.If she stayed in her “consumer advocate lane” instead of jumping into identity politics with both feet, she would have had a real chance. But she went nuts in the 2016 primary trying to win the far left and has never been heard from until that video there.
Identity politics? Lazy attack.If she stayed in her “consumer advocate lane” instead of jumping into identity politics with both feet, she would have had a real chance. But she went nuts in the 2016 primary trying to win the far left and has never been heard from until that video there.
I'm sure Yellow meant she was a target of identity politics.Identity politics? Lazy attack.
Then she lied about being Native American and finished off her career with an all-time flameout.Second best major party candidate in a decade, maybe 2.
And there we have it.Then she lied about being Native American and finished off her career with an all-time flameout.
Plenty of dem candidates spent too much time on that. That's part of what kept Hillary out.Identity politics? Lazy attack.
If only Dems were smart enough to stay away from identity politics and simply run as good old fashioned white Christians like the champion Rs.Plenty of dem candidates spent too much time on that. That's part of what kept Hillary out.
Republicans started it in the 80s with "family values"If only Dems were smart enough to stay away from identity politics and simply run as good old fashioned white Christians like the champion Rs.
Glad you have standards about lying and finishing careers with all-time flameouts. Does this mean you're not going to cast a vote for Trump?Then she lied about being Native American and finished off her career with an all-time flameout.
Identity politics? Lazy attack.
Sorry. It’s exactly what happened. She was an absolute superstar when she was taking on credit card companies and the banking industry. Then she went all in on all of the social issue stuff (I’m not saying it was good or bad it just watered down her message) and totally abandoned what made her great.Identity politics? Lazy attack.
No, voting for Trump. It’s the only option.Glad you have standards about lying and finishing careers with all-time flameouts. Does this mean you're not going to cast a vote for Trump?
You guys are trying to cuddle with Hamas to help win a few votes in Detroit. Gross.And there we have it.
You guys would be awesome if you had decent policies and a hint of integrity.
Yes, Huey Grey, your attacks are always the most industrious.Identity politics? Lazy attack.
Yes, we all know how you loathe successful women with Ds next to their name.Lieawatha is a fake through and through.
She and Trump are two separate issues and neither worthy of my vote in 2024.
Liz is not a likable person in any case.
Who was your first choice, Mao?Second best major party candidate in a decade, maybe 2.
A modest wealth tax.Liz would greatly accelerate the road to US bankruptcy, and the Fed would go crazy trying to fix insane fiscal policy with monetary policy.
She had trillions upon trillions in new spending plans, and embraced MMT.Yeah, policies like that will really bankrupt the US.
How do plan to tax wealth? Why is taxing wealth even an option, when the income used to accumulate wealth has already been taxed?A modest wealth tax.
Pegging student loan interest rates to the rates banks give their best customers.
A tiny transaction tax on market speculation and crypto conversions.
Removing tax loopholes for brokers and speculators.
Yeah, policies like that will really bankrupt the US.
None of that is inherently bad. And her specific policies were mostly good.She had trillions upon trillions in new spending plans, and embraced MMT.
She would have been a disaster.
Just because you don't understand how, and won't like anything that anyone suggests, doesn't make it bad.How do plan to tax wealth?
None of that is inherently bad.
And her specific policies were mostly good.
Excess government spending is always inherently bad.None of that is inherently bad. And her specific policies were mostly good.
Just because you don't understand how, and won't like anything that anyone suggests, doesn't make it bad.
That's a non-answer. How would you tax wealth? What kind of wealth would you tax, if that even matters?Just because you don't understand how, and won't like anything that anyone suggests, doesn't make it bad.
Based on what?No,.. it's bad.
Based on what?
Is the world going to end if the rich pay a bit more, or if students owe less interest on their loans?
Riiight.The rich already pay more than enough, and people to take out loans should be responsible for them,.. We have a spending problem.