The kid had no business being there...end of story
Perhaps, but then again neither do the out of town/state rioters/looters/arsonists. Right?
The kid had no business being there...end of story
Lol. You don’t want to gather more facts. Just say what you want to say.Just a question as I am trying to gather more facts. I have seen Dems calling this kid a racist, is there any place where he has made racist remarks, etc? I saw a comment on Facebook that this kid was raised in a racist house with these ideologies, where are they seeing this? Is it because he is ProTrump and Pro Blue LIves? From what I understand he was there to help cleanup and protect. THere are pics of him cleaning up graffitti. I hope we can find out soon why the Pedophile was chasing him, did he pull the gun on the Pedo? Wasn't sure how the racist narrative plays into this as all 3 people were white.
Lol. You don’t want to gather more facts. Just say what you want to say.
Just a question as I am trying to gather more facts. I have seen Dems calling this kid a racist, is there any place where he has made racist remarks, etc? I saw a comment on Facebook that this kid was raised in a racist house with these ideologies, where are they seeing this? Is it because he is ProTrump and Pro Blue LIves? From what I understand he was there to help cleanup and protect. THere are pics of him cleaning up graffitti. I hope we can find out soon why the Pedophile was chasing him, did he pull the gun on the Pedo? Wasn't sure how the racist narrative plays into this as all 3 people were white.
No evidence of what?There is no evidence of that. None. But we have tons of evidence he was being threatened and attacked.
So you must believe Garrett Foster was the victim then.Self defense per the Second amendment. Read up on the second amendment and their reasoning that firearms are a natural extension of man's right to defend their own life. Kyle Rittenhouse needed that weapon that night. He was about to be beat to a pulp by a pedophile on the streets of Kenosha. That gun saved his life. Also, he needed it because local and State law enforcement and government officials were derelict in their duties and watched their city burn for the two previous nights.
And what you conveniently fail to acknowledge is he was hit in the head because he had just shot someone.Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.
Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"
Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
He killed a couple Biden voters.ok.. I am not Left or RIght. I feel this kid was stupid for showing up to this and shame on his mom for bringing him. So I feel he was protecting himself and wasn't the first to shoot. When he shot the final guy, he got up and walked away. He could have went right after the elbow guy to finish him off but he didn't. He walked away. When he walked by the cops he had his hands up. I know a lot of people are mad the cops didn't shoot him because they shot Jacob Blake. I think the kid should have stopped and said he just shot 3 people instead of going home, that was stupid too.
So based off that info I know, how is he a racist, terrorist and murderer?
And they want to be manipulated.Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.
Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"
Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
No kidding. What exactly is it inside of someone that says, "Get your gun and go out looking for trouble?" I own guns, but I don't have that voice. Someone literally needs to kick my door in for me to even think about grabbing mine.Agreed, just all around shitty. What a strange time to be alive.
And what you conveniently fail to acknowledge is he was hit in the head because he had just shot someone.
Didn't you claim to be a lawyer? You're throwing around some pretty big words for someone who supposedly knows the significance of them. Here is what i think: at 17 he shouldn't have been there doing what he did, also, by the end of this, he will be viewed as a hero.
That the shooter, prior to the first shots being fired, was threatening people with his rifle.No evidence of what?
He shot an unarmed man and was then chased down.Whether or not the shooting was legal is in question.
Are you suggesting that if you hear other people say that they witnessed crime (ie "he shot someone!") that you can attack people running away from you?
Liberals - Citizens defending Property, Damn Vigilantes have no right to be there!
Also Liberals - Citizens assaulting other Citizens - Hero Vigilantes have every right to attack people!
Make up your mind.
Sigh - that's why I said "if". You're insufferable.That the shooter, prior to the first shots being fired, was threatening people with his rifle.
‘If’ he did I’d agree with you. ‘If’ he didn’t, he walks.Sigh - that's why I said "if". You're insufferable.
Maybe that badass Kyle shouldn't have been illegally walking around with a gun out in the open. The little prick had no business being out there doing what he was doing. He's a punk.Video released by the NYT confirming that someone fired a weapon in the vicinity of Kyle as he is being chased by Joe prior to Kyle firing his weapon. Kyle would have every reason to believe he was being shot at in that moment.
Ironic how you are ripping the media for peddling misinformation yet you throw out your Antifa bullshit. What's next...Deep State?Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.
Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"
Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
Ironic how you are ripping the media for peddling misinformation yet you throw out your Antifa bullshit. What's next...Deep State?
Not sure if someone already posted this but here is the link to the actual criminal complaint as filed by the DA. It’s not merely twitter propaganda. I think it’s probably better to understand the facts determined by investigators when having this discussion.
Not going to lie, EVERY.SINGLE.DETAIL. that has come out is backing this kids self defense claim.
Assuming what he says in the op "I work there" "I work at that business" is accurate it may go under the castle doctrine. One of the fsu guys says this is going to be tough siting an event that happened in a home invasion but I think they are going to be able to say he was defending the property outside because that is where the inventory/valuables were. If they can prove he was in threat I think it will just go under self defense. Wisconsin doesn't even have the "need to flee" portion of stand your ground so him running away before firing is only going to help himExcept he wasn't a manager or owner of the business, and he was committing a crime. Both items which exclude him from self defense in Wisconsin. He may still get off, but according to the written law he doesn't qualify. Everything else to me holds water.
"
How did he die?
Huber was caught in the crossfire of a gunman who opened fire on protesters in Kenosha.
"
Who was Anthony Huber, 26, and who killed him in the Kenosha protests?
ANTHONY Huber, 26, was identified as one of the men who was shot and killed after a gunman opened fire onto a crowd of protesters demonstrating against Jacob Blake’s death. The suspect was id…www.the-sun.com
"caught in the crossfire" - False
"who opened fire on protesters" - False
Assuming what he says in the op "I work there" "I work at that business" is accurate it may go under the castle doctrine. One of the fsu guys says this is going to be tough siting an event that happened in a home invasion but I think they are going to be able to say he was defending the property outside because that is where the inventory/valuables were. If they can prove he was in threat I think it will just go under self defense. Wisconsin doesn't even have the "need to flee" portion of stand your ground so him running away before firing is only going to help him
Doesn't matter according to Wisconsin legislature. Employees don't have the right to defend. Only Owner or Operator.
895.62 Use of force in response to unlawful and forcible entry into a dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business; civil liability immunity. (1) In this section:
(a) "Actor" means a person who uses force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another person.
(b) "Dwelling" has the meaning given in s. 895.07 (1) (h).
(c) "Place of business" means a business that the actor owns or operates.
With a man pursuing him and gun shots being fired in his general direction immediately preceding Joe Rosenbaum closing in on him, can he not claim he was in fear for his life and safety?
There is a video in this thread showing someone trailing both Kyle and Joe firing two shots from a handgun in the air immediately before Joe closes in on Kyle.
*edit, found it:
With this logic shouldn't anyone who saw him running around could have claimed they feared for their life and fired. Sounds like shots were fired somewhere, but by the video/stills it wasn't the guy chasing him who he shot. Then, once he shot the guy others pursued him because they just witnessed a guy shoot someone.With a man pursuing him and gun shots being fired in his general direction immediately preceding Joe Rosenbaum closing in on him, can he not claim he was in fear for his life and safety?
There is a video in this thread showing someone trailing both Kyle and Joe firing two shots from a handgun in the air immediately before Joe closes in on Kyle.
*edit, found it:
You're full of shit.Self defense per the Second amendment. Read up on the second amendment and their reasoning that firearms are a natural extension of man's right to defend their own life. Kyle Rittenhouse needed that weapon that night. He was about to be beat to a pulp by a pedophile on the streets of Kenosha. That gun saved his life. Also, he needed it because local and State law enforcement and government officials were derelict in their duties and watched their city burn for the two previous nights.
Let me ask you this. Had the guy shot in the arm had pulled his weapon and shot the kid dead in the street and he claimed he saw him shoot an unarmed man a block away and then while pursing him the kid turned with the gun and fearing he was next he defended himself... would that work?