ADVERTISEMENT

EVERY VIDEO OF KYLE RITTENHOUSE (KENOSHA SHOOTING)

Just a question as I am trying to gather more facts. I have seen Dems calling this kid a racist, is there any place where he has made racist remarks, etc? I saw a comment on Facebook that this kid was raised in a racist house with these ideologies, where are they seeing this? Is it because he is ProTrump and Pro Blue LIves? From what I understand he was there to help cleanup and protect. THere are pics of him cleaning up graffitti. I hope we can find out soon why the Pedophile was chasing him, did he pull the gun on the Pedo? Wasn't sure how the racist narrative plays into this as all 3 people were white.
 
Just a question as I am trying to gather more facts. I have seen Dems calling this kid a racist, is there any place where he has made racist remarks, etc? I saw a comment on Facebook that this kid was raised in a racist house with these ideologies, where are they seeing this? Is it because he is ProTrump and Pro Blue LIves? From what I understand he was there to help cleanup and protect. THere are pics of him cleaning up graffitti. I hope we can find out soon why the Pedophile was chasing him, did he pull the gun on the Pedo? Wasn't sure how the racist narrative plays into this as all 3 people were white.
Lol. You don’t want to gather more facts. Just say what you want to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: damayason
Lol. You don’t want to gather more facts. Just say what you want to say.

ok.. I am not Left or RIght. I feel this kid was stupid for showing up to this and shame on his mom for bringing him. So I feel he was protecting himself and wasn't the first to shoot. When he shot the final guy, he got up and walked away. He could have went right after the elbow guy to finish him off but he didn't. He walked away. When he walked by the cops he had his hands up. I know a lot of people are mad the cops didn't shoot him because they shot Jacob Blake. I think the kid should have stopped and said he just shot 3 people instead of going home, that was stupid too.

So based off that info I know, how is he a racist, terrorist and murderer?
 
Just a question as I am trying to gather more facts. I have seen Dems calling this kid a racist, is there any place where he has made racist remarks, etc? I saw a comment on Facebook that this kid was raised in a racist house with these ideologies, where are they seeing this? Is it because he is ProTrump and Pro Blue LIves? From what I understand he was there to help cleanup and protect. THere are pics of him cleaning up graffitti. I hope we can find out soon why the Pedophile was chasing him, did he pull the gun on the Pedo? Wasn't sure how the racist narrative plays into this as all 3 people were white.

Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.

Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an *individual. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"

Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.

*amended for accuracy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WARHAWK
Self defense per the Second amendment. Read up on the second amendment and their reasoning that firearms are a natural extension of man's right to defend their own life. Kyle Rittenhouse needed that weapon that night. He was about to be beat to a pulp by a pedophile on the streets of Kenosha. That gun saved his life. Also, he needed it because local and State law enforcement and government officials were derelict in their duties and watched their city burn for the two previous nights.
So you must believe Garrett Foster was the victim then.
 
Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.

Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"

Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
And what you conveniently fail to acknowledge is he was hit in the head because he had just shot someone.
 
ok.. I am not Left or RIght. I feel this kid was stupid for showing up to this and shame on his mom for bringing him. So I feel he was protecting himself and wasn't the first to shoot. When he shot the final guy, he got up and walked away. He could have went right after the elbow guy to finish him off but he didn't. He walked away. When he walked by the cops he had his hands up. I know a lot of people are mad the cops didn't shoot him because they shot Jacob Blake. I think the kid should have stopped and said he just shot 3 people instead of going home, that was stupid too.

So based off that info I know, how is he a racist, terrorist and murderer?
He killed a couple Biden voters.
 
Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.

Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"

Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
And they want to be manipulated.
 
Agreed, just all around shitty. What a strange time to be alive.
No kidding. What exactly is it inside of someone that says, "Get your gun and go out looking for trouble?" I own guns, but I don't have that voice. Someone literally needs to kick my door in for me to even think about grabbing mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: laker3588
And what you conveniently fail to acknowledge is he was hit in the head because he had just shot someone.

Whether or not the shooting was legal is in question.

Are you suggesting that if you hear other people say that they witnessed crime (ie "he shot someone!") that you can attack people running away from you?

Liberals - Citizens defending Property, Damn Vigilantes have no right to be there!

Also Liberals - Citizens assaulting other Citizens - Hero Vigilantes have every right to attack people!

Make up your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuck C
Didn't you claim to be a lawyer? You're throwing around some pretty big words for someone who supposedly knows the significance of them. Here is what i think: at 17 he shouldn't have been there doing what he did, also, by the end of this, he will be viewed as a hero.

It seems he's already achieved hero status among the alt-right/incel groups. I doubt he'll achieve that status among decent groups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Whether or not the shooting was legal is in question.

Are you suggesting that if you hear other people say that they witnessed crime (ie "he shot someone!") that you can attack people running away from you?

Liberals - Citizens defending Property, Damn Vigilantes have no right to be there!

Also Liberals - Citizens assaulting other Citizens - Hero Vigilantes have every right to attack people!

Make up your mind.
He shot an unarmed man and was then chased down.

There is no place in our society for vigilante justice. None.
 
Sigh - that's why I said "if". You're insufferable.
‘If’ he did I’d agree with you. ‘If’ he didn’t, he walks.

The only reason they are charging him with crimes, they know they can’t successfully prosecute him for, is fear of more reprisals.
 
Video released by the NYT confirming that someone fired a weapon in the vicinity of Kyle as he is being chased by Joe prior to Kyle firing his weapon. Kyle would have every reason to believe he was being shot at in that moment.

Maybe that badass Kyle shouldn't have been illegally walking around with a gun out in the open. The little prick had no business being out there doing what he was doing. He's a punk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JupiterHawk
Just liberal/media smears. Read any major news outlet accounting of the events. There are either completely false easily refuted statements or completely omitted facts in every one of them.

Per the MSM, he wasn't punched in the back of the head, he "tripped." Yeah....after he was PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. He "tripped" because he was assaulted by an antifa anarchist. No mention of that fact.... "he tripped"

Reading these stories i can understand why so many are upset over these events but i would say to those who have not watched all the videos themselves, you are being manipulated.
Ironic how you are ripping the media for peddling misinformation yet you throw out your Antifa bullshit. What's next...Deep State?
 
The kid was all over the place. Claimed to be a medic, was seen washing graffiti off the wall, claimed to be working for businesses. Probably had good intentions...but I gotta believe walking around with an AR - you have be (at the bottom of your heart) hoping for a confrontation of some kind.

kyle-rittenhouse-graffiti3.jpg
 
Ironic how you are ripping the media for peddling misinformation yet you throw out your Antifa bullshit. What's next...Deep State?

Fair enough, that may be presumptuous on my part and inaccurate. What exactly was he doing in Kenosha, illegally after curfew, in an area of town that had been burning down the previous two nights? Out for a stroll?

He was from Silver Lake, WI, 20 miles away and the "protest" that happened earlier in the evening was over.
 
Last edited:
"
How did he die?
Huber was caught in the crossfire of a gunman who opened fire on protesters in Kenosha.
"


"caught in the crossfire" - False

"who opened fire on protesters" - False
 
Not going to lie, EVERY.SINGLE.DETAIL. that has come out is backing this kids self defense claim.

Except he wasn't a manager or owner of the business, and he was committing a crime. Both items which exclude him from self defense in Wisconsin. He may still get off, but according to the written law he doesn't qualify. Everything else to me holds water.
 

LOL so many things wrong with this tweet. According to Robert he was just casually getting in his car to take his kids to the grocery store and was gunned down willy nilly by police. He didn't have a warrant out for his arrest, he didn't resist arrest, he didn't have or reach for a knife, he hadn't just been tased and withstood being detained. Nope, just casually trying to get in his car to leave.

The white youth didn't have the altercation a block away from law enforcement and then walk up to the law enforcement who may or may not have witness anything that happened on a pitch black street a block away. The law enforcement weren't in their armored vehicles with bullet proof glass, with helmets on and headsets on tuned into police radio communications or scanners, nope. That was just a figment of everyone's imagination that actually watched the video.

Trump didn't send anyone in to crush "protesters" he sent them in to stop rioters, arsonists and looters who were destroying a city.

Robert has no agenda though with this complete miss-characterization of reality, nope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haw-key
Except he wasn't a manager or owner of the business, and he was committing a crime. Both items which exclude him from self defense in Wisconsin. He may still get off, but according to the written law he doesn't qualify. Everything else to me holds water.
Assuming what he says in the op "I work there" "I work at that business" is accurate it may go under the castle doctrine. One of the fsu guys says this is going to be tough siting an event that happened in a home invasion but I think they are going to be able to say he was defending the property outside because that is where the inventory/valuables were. If they can prove he was in threat I think it will just go under self defense. Wisconsin doesn't even have the "need to flee" portion of stand your ground so him running away before firing is only going to help him
 
"
How did he die?
Huber was caught in the crossfire of a gunman who opened fire on protesters in Kenosha.
"


"caught in the crossfire" - False

"who opened fire on protesters" - False

that article was pretty lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: haw-key
Assuming what he says in the op "I work there" "I work at that business" is accurate it may go under the castle doctrine. One of the fsu guys says this is going to be tough siting an event that happened in a home invasion but I think they are going to be able to say he was defending the property outside because that is where the inventory/valuables were. If they can prove he was in threat I think it will just go under self defense. Wisconsin doesn't even have the "need to flee" portion of stand your ground so him running away before firing is only going to help him

Doesn't matter according to Wisconsin legislature. Employees don't have the right to defend. Only Owner or Operator.

895.62 Use of force in response to unlawful and forcible entry into a dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business; civil liability immunity. (1) In this section:
(a) "Actor" means a person who uses force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another person.
(b) "Dwelling" has the meaning given in s. 895.07 (1) (h).
(c) "Place of business" means a business that the actor owns or operates.
 
Doesn't matter according to Wisconsin legislature. Employees don't have the right to defend. Only Owner or Operator.

895.62 Use of force in response to unlawful and forcible entry into a dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business; civil liability immunity. (1) In this section:
(a) "Actor" means a person who uses force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another person.
(b) "Dwelling" has the meaning given in s. 895.07 (1) (h).
(c) "Place of business" means a business that the actor owns or operates.

With a man pursuing him and gun shots being fired in his general direction immediately preceding Joe Rosenbaum closing in on him, can he not claim he was in fear for his life and safety?

There is a video in this thread showing someone trailing both Kyle and Joe firing two shots from a handgun in the air immediately before Joe closes in on Kyle.

*edit, found it:

 
With a man pursuing him and gun shots being fired in his general direction immediately preceding Joe Rosenbaum closing in on him, can he not claim he was in fear for his life and safety?

There is a video in this thread showing someone trailing both Kyle and Joe firing two shots from a handgun in the air immediately before Joe closes in on Kyle.

*edit, found it:



Wisconsin law appears to very narrow. Has to be in or around, vehicle or house, or Owner operator of business. That is it. I am sure the defense will try to state otherwise, but I am not sure he is covered by the law.
 
With a man pursuing him and gun shots being fired in his general direction immediately preceding Joe Rosenbaum closing in on him, can he not claim he was in fear for his life and safety?

There is a video in this thread showing someone trailing both Kyle and Joe firing two shots from a handgun in the air immediately before Joe closes in on Kyle.

*edit, found it:

With this logic shouldn't anyone who saw him running around could have claimed they feared for their life and fired. Sounds like shots were fired somewhere, but by the video/stills it wasn't the guy chasing him who he shot. Then, once he shot the guy others pursued him because they just witnessed a guy shoot someone.

Let me ask you this. Had the guy shot in the arm had pulled his weapon and shot the kid dead in the street and he claimed he saw him shoot an unarmed man a block away and then while pursing him the kid turned with the gun and fearing he was next he defended himself... would that work?

Said it before and say it again. I don't understand people's need for having guns nor do i understand the thought some have of wanting everyone running around with one and shooting it up like Dodge City. Leave this to the police and military.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Self defense per the Second amendment. Read up on the second amendment and their reasoning that firearms are a natural extension of man's right to defend their own life. Kyle Rittenhouse needed that weapon that night. He was about to be beat to a pulp by a pedophile on the streets of Kenosha. That gun saved his life. Also, he needed it because local and State law enforcement and government officials were derelict in their duties and watched their city burn for the two previous nights.
You're full of shit.
 
That kid was an idiot to be there with or without a gun. That said, he was protecting himself from a certain beating and potential death. Those dudes were going to curb stomp his ass and I don't think he had much of a choice but to shoot them to protect himself. Also, anyone who thinks those were peaceful protestors is blind, stupid or both. Those were some dudes looking to beat someone.
 
Let me ask you this. Had the guy shot in the arm had pulled his weapon and shot the kid dead in the street and he claimed he saw him shoot an unarmed man a block away and then while pursing him the kid turned with the gun and fearing he was next he defended himself... would that work?

Good question, I don't know. It would be a little harder to claim self defense considering he was the pursuer. Kyle was literally running away from everyone he shot that night, no exceptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haw-key
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT