ADVERTISEMENT

FSU to the B1G

  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
If the money matched or surpassed that of the $EC and/or the B1G, I could tolerate a BIG XII that looked like this:

Division A:​

  1. Florida State (FSU)
  2. Clemson
  3. Miami
  4. Georgia Tech
  5. North Carolina
  6. NC State
  7. Duke
  8. Virginia (UVA)
  9. Virginia Tech
  10. Louisville
  11. Pitt

Division B:​

  1. Notre Dame
  2. Memphis
  3. Oklahoma State
  4. Utah
  5. Colorado
  6. Texas Tech
  7. BYU
  8. Texas Christian (TCU)
  9. Arizona
  10. West Virginia
  11. Kansas
Problem is there aren't many Blue Bloods, so the perception would still be that it's weaker.
I can't believe that you'd leave Baylor out despite their success in football (recent conference champ and Sugar Bowl win) and both M and W basketball.
 
The only people I trust are three people I know personally connected to FSU’s inner workings and not some talking heads and they’ve said independent of each other that it was FSU to the BIG long before any lawsuit actually happened. And they continue to reassure me any time I ask that it’s still true. There have been talks with the SEC and Big 12 as well as private equity as an independent as well but that’s just due diligence in case something happens with the real option.
 
If the money matched or surpassed that of the $EC and/or the B1G, I could tolerate a BIG XII that looked like this:

Division A:​

  1. Florida State (FSU)
  2. Clemson
  3. Miami
  4. Georgia Tech
  5. North Carolina
  6. NC State
  7. Duke
  8. Virginia (UVA)
  9. Virginia Tech
  10. Louisville
  11. Pitt

Division B:​

  1. Notre Dame
  2. Memphis
  3. Oklahoma State
  4. Utah
  5. Colorado
  6. Texas Tech
  7. Baylor
  8. Texas Christian (TCU)
  9. Arizona
  10. West Virginia
  11. Kansas
Problem is there aren't many Blue Bloods, so the perception would still be that it's weaker.
So KSU, BYU, Houston, and ISU would vote for a merger which eliminates themselves from the conference?
 
dave-chapelle-funny-come-on-gesture-7en9w62at0wu38g9.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: FSUTribe76
No clue. Just throwing crap on a wall to see if it sticks.
Got it, it is just that scenario - especially including ND - is implausible unless the conferences all were dissolved and were created anew. At this point for the Big 10 with it adding the 4 PAC teams, it is so far gone from what I know I would take the addition of ND and FSU and call it good at 20, unless somehow we can get a toehold in Texas with TA$MU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alaskanseminole
The maths already been done...this doesn't even include the last two years


That's not the math though, the question is whether FSU's addition adds enough new eyeballs/tv subscriptions/advertising dollars to the conference to increase the contract share per member. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't - I don't know, but I can infer that the B1G/FOX/CBS/NBC have done the math on it.
 
I take all these articles with a huge grain of salt but this makes a lot more sense to me than FSU and Clemson. AAU membership is a real factor

FSU fans might want to start thinking about tailgates in Ames instead of Iowa City. Never thought the b10 presidents would approve a school that still does that god awful tomahawk chop anyway

 
  • Haha
Reactions: alaskanseminole
I take all these articles with a huge grain of salt but this makes a lot more sense to me than FSU and Clemson. AAU membership is a real factor

FSU fans might want to start thinking about tailgates in Ames instead of Iowa City. Never thought the b10 presidents would approve a school that still does that god awful tomahawk chop anyway

Tell us about Nebraska's AAU membership.
 
Hmmmmmm…possible settlement

FSU and Clemson STAYING PUT in the ACC? | FSU Football | ACC Lawsuit | FSU Lawsuit | Clemson Lawsuit

 
Last edited:
Suggested settlement would keep FSU in the ACC through 2030. FSU would be paid much more, on ratings, and could exit 6 years early. Also no massive exit fee. This would be approximately 3 years longer than if FSU prevails in court.

How the ACC Could Find Enough Money To Keep Florida State and Clemson | Cover 3 College Football

 
Last edited:
Suggested settlement would keep FSU in the ACC through 2030. FSU would be paid much more, on ratings, and could exit 6 years early. Also no massive exit fee. This would be approximately 3 years longer than if FSU prevails in court.

How the ACC Could Find Enough Money To Keep Florida State and Clemson | Cover 3 College Football



Interesting. Might allow for a more soft landing OUT of the ACC to delay, meets the "we need more $ in general now", we don't get a huge penalty and drags feet to see what changes are in play 2030. I think college ball needs a 3rd strong conference for more balance, but the ACC has waited too long to find the right schools. Imagine if 18 months ago the ACC had been able to grab Oregon, Washington, Stanford, USC.
 
Suggested settlement would keep FSU in the ACC through 2030. FSU would be paid much more, on ratings, and could exit 6 years early. Also no massive exit fee. This would be approximately 3 years longer than if FSU prevails in court.

How the ACC Could Find Enough Money To Keep Florida State and Clemson | Cover 3 College Football

I don’t know if Bud mentioned this, but the next Big 10 media deal will begin after the 2029-30 season. Oregon and Washington will not receive full shares until then. If FSU wants into the Big 10, this deal with the ACC is the best option for maximizing income.
 
I don’t know if Bud mentioned this, but the next Big 10 media deal will begin after the 2029-30 season. Oregon and Washington will not receive full shares until then. If FSU wants into the Big 10, this deal with the ACC is the best option for maximizing income.

Towards the end, he mentioned that another round of re-alingment would be taking place in 2030 so this could work out well for FSU
 
  • Like
Reactions: mnole03
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT