Twice on the same drive.
unless it is an unsportsman like act then yes that is pretty much what you go by .
he was insinuating a foul should have been called ( he will be on here real quick saying he was not ) if RK did not move was there really a foul ? i dont think i made a hypothetical i was referring to the situation he mentioned . he said RK was bull rushed , i did not .
every post you make is questioning some refs call . surprised you have time to post , is it not time for your daily dildo ? lol
Actually, the rule is that you can't intentionally attempt to displace a defender that has established a legal guarding position.
).........thanks for adding " interpret "Actually, the rule is that you can't intentionally attempt to displace a defender that has established a legal guarding position.
It doesn't matter if Kriener got knocked on his ass, or just laughed at Oturu and asked him if his mother hit harder (which is pretty much what actually happened in the game
Now, this is one of those calls that the refs will let the players go unless there is a clear advantage gained. If Kriener set himself up to get knocked over, it would've been an obvious offensive foul call. But Kriener chose to show up the supposed future NBA draft pick.
Just because the refs let certain things go, doesn't mean it's not illegal according to the rule.
Officials are there to "interpret" the rules of the game and enforce them.
Hope that helps...................
you are correct in everything you said but officials work on the premise of advantage versus disadvantage unless an unsportsman like act is going to happen or is happening .Actually, the rule is that you can't intentionally attempt to displace a defender that has established a legal guarding position.
It doesn't matter if Kriener got knocked on his ass, or just laughed at Oturu and asked him if his mother hit harder (which is pretty much what actually happened in the game
Now, this is one of those calls that the refs will let the players go unless there is a clear advantage gained. If Kriener set himself up to get knocked over, it would've been an obvious offensive foul call. But Kriener chose to show up the supposed future NBA draft pick.
Just because the refs let certain things go, doesn't mean it's not illegal according to the rule.
Officials are there to "interpret" the rules of the game and enforce them.
Hope that helps...................
Okay.............so what was it that you had an issue with, again?you are correct in everything you said (I know I am.....That's why I said it.
i dont believe I had an issue with anything . just glad i am able to help you out with your understanding of the rule book . please dont " interpret " my post the wrong way . lol
Lol nah, you haven't told me anything I didn't already know.
Lol nah, you haven't told me anything I didn't already know.
I'm glad I could help show you where you were wrong though.
Btw, have you ever officiated before?
almost 30 years , 3 state tourneys . btw you showed me nothing but your lack of offciating common sense .Lol nah, you haven't told me anything I didn't already know.
I'm glad I could help show you where you were wrong though.
Btw, have you ever officiated before?
Lol and now the truth comes out. Classic official having officials back. Spent last March madness with a D1 ref and he was an insufferable SOB.. no accountability from that group that “can do no wrong”
never said they are always right , never . i see plenty of calls i dont agree with . kriener has gotten called for alot of hooks lately . i dont think they are hooks at all . i think all he his doing is pivoting his shoulders around the defensive guys body . i dont think bacari fouled that guy the other night on the 3pt attempt . there are many more and yes most of the time i will have the officials back because most of you know very little about the rules .
Lulz, looks like I struck a nerve.
Lulz, looks like I struck a nerve.
First, I was right, and now I lack common sense. There's that inconsistency I was talking about. 30 years worth of it, apparently........
Got eem.
good , you finally understand .Lulz, looks like I struck a nerve.
First, I was right, and now I lack common sense. There's that inconsistency I was talking about. 30 years worth of it, apparently........
Got eem.
That you're employing the condescendingly vague a**hole routine that I see most former officials on Rivals go to because of how jaded they are by fans complaining? Yeah, I could see that after your first couple of posts in this thread......
condescending asshole routine coming from you , classic .That you're employing the condescendingly vague a**hole routine that I see most former officials on Rivals go to because of how jaded they are by fans complaining? Yeah, I could see that after your first couple of posts in this thread......
Too bad for you I know how to play that role as well.
You're gonna have to go with a more direct approach if you wanna get anywhere in here.
Lol posts are just you stalling because you can't come up with anything better to respond with. Has nothing to do with you rubbing the idea that you know something the fans don't in their faces, and I know this because you actually don't know.
So yeah.....I've understood this entire time.
You revealing that you're a jaded, bitter ref just helps clear up why you're responding to others the way you are.
That's really all I wanted to know.....
Thanks for playing.
the first 10 were not on the varsity level . i had to travel at least an hour and a half on most night to get to a varsity game . had to decide if the sacrifice to my family 3 nights a week was worth it .
yes you can Mr emoji man . lolI mean I said I can play that role as well......
