Aww, and here I thought you said you were going to be nice. Well, at least you have Blazin on your side. He's the Baghdad Bob of the "defend GWB till I die" crowd.
Really, dipshit? How so?
Aww, and here I thought you said you were going to be nice. Well, at least you have Blazin on your side. He's the Baghdad Bob of the "defend GWB till I die" crowd.
Anything you may have said with compassion just got torn down with your finale'. Good for you. I hope it was worth it. You could have saved all that typing and just wrote what I quoted above. That's your focus, obviously.
Where did I ever say, or even remotely imply, that African-descent people DON'T have the right to contempt for the way they were treated? It was a disgrace, by our standards today, that they were ever put in chains to begin with!That's how treason and civil war was handled 150 years ago and that's what they got into knowingly. It is not like it was standard operating procedure when you won a civil war to be really really nice to the losers. That almost never happened historically and our civil war is about the one and only instance where it did happen.
But I would like your take on the issue of contempt here because African Americans have a clear right to feel contempt for everything that the South did to them from 40 years ago to before the founding of the country. But that's not the contempt you talk about. You talk about contempt for losing a war that they started 150 years ago and getting a few cities and homes burned down 150 years ago.
No one around today was alive then and none of their parents where either. But there are plenty of Blacks who where there to watch friends and relatives be hung and killed and then in the face of mountains of evidence have all white juries pronounce not guilty with 15 min of deliberations which probably involved 5 min of actual deliberations and 10 minutes of bathroom break time.
You do know the South fired first right? You're understanding of history is a little off.A fellow Southerner who has swallowed the hate and propaganda of the invaders from the north. The Civil War(a more appropriate name would be The South's War for Independence)was fought for a lot of other reasons. Don't try to make it all about slavery. The South should have been allowed to go its own way peacefully which is what it tried to do.
Where did I ever say, or even remotely imply, that African-descent people DON'T have the right to contempt for the way they were treated? It was a disgrace, by our standards today, that they were ever put in chains to begin with!
"Getting a few cities and homes burned down..."??? I'm sorry, dude. I have no more to discuss with you. That shows just how little you really know about what was really experienced here. I'm not encouraging people to memorialize the destruction, but I do understand WHY THEY DO IT! I'm not enabling them, but I UNDERSTAND IT! The same way I understand why blacks are threatened by it. You have to display empathy everywhere, not just where you think it belongs.
Good job! By that endorsement, you actually display a sentiment of fondness for the destruction of your ancestor's home.
Maybe so! It's a work-in-progress. I'll try harder.Not sure how you get that. Judge much?
But I again fail to understand why I should feel empathy for people who's ancestors from 150 years ago where harmed.
Just getting their house burned down is at worse extremely merciful justice. They where still alive, they where still free. Heck they even got their voting rights back.
Yeah... being demoralized and dehumanized is no big deal. That's exactly what happened to blacks. That's why they still feel contempt. War is never an answer. War is humanity losing it's civility in every possible way... and then watching them justify it for the rest of history.
As I said earlier, I'm done with you. Good luck.
Southern whites as a group do not understand what being dehumanized is. They never did.
Trying to care, really trying...I just don't.But don't worry, it's not racist. They're just celebrating their heritage. Specifically that period of time in which they seceded from the Union because they were concerned the federal government was going to take away their right to own slaves.
YES! They DO! That's evident in their behavior ever since! It wouldn't have been my choice of behavior, but they do understand being dehumanized and demoralized.
I mentioned to a friend that it seems like everyone expects all southerners living NOW to feel shame in the same way, they assume, all Germans should have felt immediately after World War II, in order for everything to be in balance. Maybe that will finally come to pass. I don't know. The Nazis were not the South in 1861 and vice versa.
Sure the KKK used the American Flag, but that use didn't turn the American Flag into a symbol of racism. The use of the American Flag in so many other situations overwhelmed the relatively small use by the KKK. Now to contrast that with the Confederate Flag. The Confederate flag isn't flown by the military in every battle. It isn't flown at every parade. And it doesn't sit behind every President in the Oval Office. The Confederate Flag was mostly flown by Southerners and was adopted by racists as a rallying point, which is why it is mostly seen in a racist light.
Why not simply select another symbol that doesn't have such negative connotations and use that as a rallying point for pride? Seems a whole lot easier to me.
Well, that may be the case for some, but not necessarily all. Their choices may be for a different purpose than what you think they are. I don't cling to a war as representing me. I don't believe the South was fighting for a just cause. But, I am from the South. Many of my ancestors fought in it, some died in it. My great-great grandmother was raped by a Yankee patrol, much like the scene from Cold Mountain, only no one was there to kill the Yankees. I don't hate people from the North at all.I don't hate groups of people in general, ever! I never knew my great-great grandparents. I never suffered directly from the horrors of that war, but I know they all did. I know African-descent people were dehumanized even worse for centuries. I don't glorify that in any way, shape, or form. I think it's insane that it was ever allowed or started at all.The only people who need to feel shame are the ones who are still clinging to a long ago lost war in defense of slavery as their "heritage". Unfortunately, they are exactly the same people who feel neither shame for their choices not empathy for those who truly suffered.
My bad. I thought you were the guy whose job it was to sell the war while you were in Iraq. One of the "you don't support the troops if you don't support the mission" guys. Then, when stateside, was doing the job for free.Really, dipshit? How so?
Not having the state issue them does not mean that people want everything to be plain and boring.
It's pretty funny to see conservatives for this. They hate government until it's supporting their ideology, then the State should definitely be allowed to promote their views.
Well, that may be the case for some, but not necessarily all. Their choices may be for a different purpose than what you think they are. I don't cling to a war as representing me. I don't believe the South was fighting for a just cause. But, I am from the South. Many of my ancestors fought in it, some died in it. My great-great grandmother was raped by a Yankee patrol, much like the scene from Cold Mountain, only no one was there to kill the Yankees. I don't hate people from the North at all.I don't hate groups of people in general, ever! I never knew my great-great grandparents. I never suffered directly from the horrors of that war, but I know they all did. I know African-descent people were dehumanized even worse for centuries. I don't glorify that in any way, shape, or form. I think it's insane that it was ever allowed or started at all.
I still think the Rebel flag looks cool. I think the Jolly Roger looks cool. The Union Jack looks cool. I don't see "Liberty and Freedom" by looking at the Stars and Stripes. I just see a cool-looking flag. I even find the German and Japanese flags of WWII cool-looking. I don't really associate crimes or behaviors with symbols. I never have. The flags of France, Italy, Russia (now) are boring as hell. I thought the USSR flag was cool-looking. It doesn't mean I wanna live there or endorse what their government does. I rarely endorse what the US Government does. I don't believe that flying the Rebel Flag, or displaying it, automatically means you want black people back on plantations anymore than flying the US Flag means you want all people to be treated fairly and all should receive Constitutional rights.
Jameis Christ, you are an ignorant fool.So because you don't want to [publicly] acknowledge the symbolism inherent in the flag you don't think anyone else should? You are likely correct in your assertion that not all flyers of the flag are racists - but it's also likely that most are. So it's on them if they choose to display symbols that would identify them in that way. Why you believe the onus is on the observer to make that distinction is a mystery.
And please don't trot out that tired canard about not judging others...EVERYBODY does it. You've demonstrated that yourself in this very thread.
We don't expect today's southerners to feel shame for what happened long before they were born. We just don't understand why they want to glorify symbols of that era. And we don't want government entities participating in the glorification of those symbols.I mentioned to a friend that it seems like everyone expects all southerners living NOW to feel shame in the same way, they assume, all Germans should have felt immediately after World War II, in order for everything to be in balance. Maybe that will finally come to pass. I don't know. The Nazis were not the South in 1861 and vice versa.
All countries and governments have their fair share of indignities to humanity. Not all of them "win" wars. That's one of the biggest impediments to human society- Might Makes Right.
Jameis Christ, you are an ignorant fool.
Most people DO NOT consider the flag racist.
So because you don't want to [publicly] acknowledge the symbolism inherent in the flag you don't think anyone else should?
Most people DO NOT consider the flag racist.
No, I never said or implied that at all. If you see it, have whatever reaction you want to have, or feel like having. It doesn't mean your reaction is accurate to the person displaying it, if that's how you come across it somewhere.
Whether or not people judge isn't the point. The point is NOT to judge!
I have never, ever once said they wouldn't have to deal with the circumstances. They do, and will... always.The idea that someone can do or say anything they wish and NOT suffer consequences is idiotic.
I have never, ever once said they wouldn't have to deal with the circumstances. They do, and will... always.
Again, the point isn't whether or not we judge, the point is not to judge. More specifically, I'd say condemnation. Is that better? Labeling a person a racist because they use a symbol that has been used by racists. Now, get the last word so you can feel like you won. I realize it's of utmost importance for you to be right and "win."
Double check your facts before making a fool of youself.Not only do most people consider the flag racist, most people consider anybody (read, YOU) racist for displaying same.
Blather endlessly about your lack of racism and rationale for displaying the flag all you want, your actions speak louder than your words.
Your actions, at a minimum, enable racism and encourage racists.
Even if that number is correct, do you think maybe it's not appropriate for state governments to be issuing commemorative license plates that one out of every three people consider highly offensive?Only 33 percent of people consider the flag a racist symbol.
Why do you care if it's not your state? You aren't required to own one WITH the flag. It's an option. Option is a key word here. Optional is not mandatory. Look at the bright side; Virginia has ceased to allow even SCV members to have their plate. The SCV is a historical society. Of course, they memorialize what most here regard as treason, but, that's because you're in Iowa.Even if that number is correct, do you think maybe it's not appropriate for state governments to be issuing commemorative license plates that one out of every three people consider highly offensive?
Really? Your question is why a citizen of this nation should care that a government within our borders is officially endorsing bigotry, rebellion and the dissolution of civil rights that took numerous years, lives and fortunes to secure? How about you sit tonight and ponder that question for a little bit.Why do you care if it's not your state? You aren't required to own one WITH the flag. It's an option. Option is a key word here. Optional is not mandatory. Look at the bright side; Virginia has ceased to allow even SCV members to have their plate. The SCV is a historical society. Of course, they memorialize what most here regard as treason, but, that's because you're in Iowa.
I wouldn't ever want my license plate to bear that flag, but the option doesn't "enable racism" to me. People are racists with or without symbols. People are prejudiced with or without them. Just like your graphic depiction earlier of a hillbilly with a mullet and one tooth, or whatever... that reveals a prejudice. They're sub-human to you, right? Why do you care if the state they live in allows it? They don't care if your state doesn't allow it. I would be willing to bet that in Georgia, it's more like one out of every 303 are bothered by it, or even 3,003.
No matter what some of y'all think. The flag does have meaning to many of us Southerners that we find important and has nothing to do with racism. I try to educate people on that and have in the past. I'm not gonna change everyone's mind, particularly not those who insist on remaining ignorant, but I can live with that. That's their problem, not mine.
Um, no... no, that's not "my question." That's your version of what you think my question should be so you can respond with that bowl of Yankee Doodle Soup. In other words, it's a bunch of hyperbole you made up.Really? Your question is why a citizen of this nation should care that a government within our borders is officially endorsing bigotry, rebellion and the dissolution of civil rights that took numerous years, lives and fortunes to secure? How about you sit tonight and ponder that question for a little bit.
You need to think on this some more and find a more suitable meme. You'll know when i serve up drama.Um, no... no, that's not "my question." That's your version of what you think my question should be so you can respond with that bowl of Yankee Doodle Soup.
![]()
In a thread about a symbol and people's prejudices, tries to insult me by calling me gay.Backs into parking spaces.
Backs into big ol' Yankee dick.
Blames everyone else for not getting what he's layin' down.
Um, no... no, that's not "my question." That's your version of what you think my question should be so you can respond with that bowl of Yankee Doodle Soup. In other words, it's a bunch of hyperbole you made up.
You don't "fully support their right to do so." You fully support the opportunity to judge them. You revel in the chance to appear superior to others. At least be honest.
Judging is no better than putting people in chains against their will. Judging puts the chains on them.
No matter what some of y'all think. The flag does have meaning to many of us Southerners that we find important and has nothing to do with racism. I try to educate people on that and have in the past. I'm not gonna change everyone's mind, particularly not those who insist on remaining ignorant, but I can live with that. That's their problem, not mine.