ADVERTISEMENT

HCQ? You read it here first

William Bonney

HR Heisman
Mar 24, 2017
7,186
3,165
113

The Spectator Australia

In the wee small hours before the dawn of the Independence Day holiday weekend, presumably when it hoped no one was watching, CNN quietly did its biggest backflip of the pandemic, tweeting: ‘A surprising new study found that the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) helped Covid-19 patients better survive in hospital.’

Surprising? Not to readers of The Spectator Australia where Rebecca Weisser first reported success of HCQ and Azithromycin (AZM), the dynamic drug duo, on 28 March. The study, published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, reported that HCQ combined with Azithromycin reduced the risk of dying by a stunning 71 per cent compared with no treatment at all and could have ‘an important role to play in reducing Covid-19 mortality.’

What was surprising was that CNN finally felt compelled to report the good news. Ever since President Trump first dubbed the drug combo a ‘GAME CHANGER!’ and ‘a gift from God,’ he has been derided and the drug demonised. This time, there was no mention of Trump, much less an apology.

Over the past few months, in nine of her regular columns, Ms Weisser has followed the fortunes of HCQ + AZM as a cure for the coronavirus.

It reads like a modern-day morality tale, in which two poor but honest, generic drugs, so highly regarded that they feature on the World Health Organisation’s model list of essential medicines, are bravely championed or vexatiously villainised by a Chaucerian cast of heroes and villains.

Red Ted (Tedros) Adhanom, the mad Marxist running the WHO, didn’t even want to test HCQ as a cure for Covid, despite concrete evidence that it was effective against the new virus. When Professor Didier Raoult, a Gallic wizard with an uncanny resemblance to Getafix in the Asterix and Obelix books, unlocked the magical potency of HCQ by combining it with AZM, it should have been, as he said, fin de partie, game over.

But the enemies of HCQ were just warming up.

Lancetgate revealed that a company called Surgisphere had manufactured fake data to claim, wrongly as it turned out, that the combination of HCQ and AZM was in fact a killer. The results were published in the once highly-respected British medical journal, the Lancet, but it was the peer review conducted on Twitter that uncovered the fraud and forced a retraction. Britons were subjected to an even worse fate; a massive dose of HCQ which was described by a leading French authority on infectious diseases as ‘super toxic.’

This black comedy would be amusing if it weren’t for the fact that on 21 March, when Trump first promoted HCQ + AZM, there had only been 376 deaths in the US and as of 5 July there have been 132,601. Almost all of those deaths, arguably, were avoidable. Treated early, even centenarians in nursing homes with several co-morbidities have survived. A safe vaccine would be nice but is not essential. We can live with a treatable virus — work, study, travel, go to concerts, sports arenas, houses of worship — and get on with our lives.

Trump has been spectacularly vindicated yet that is unlikely to put an end to the shenanigans of Big Pharma, Big Media and Big Partisans who have no interest in letting him get back to making America great again

LINK
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
A family friend just took it. She’s probably close to 70 and good health. Doc told her it would cut down the length of her symptoms. She said 3 days later she was fine. Now I don’t know if it was the HCQ or just her good health. Either way, she’s not dead and feels great
 
Take all the HCQ you want. No one is stopping you. I'm just saying I will not be taking it.
I would seriously hope you would consider it if you were actually in the situation to need help, considering those that it has helped.
 
I would seriously hope you would consider it if you were actually in the situation to need help, considering those that it has helped.
There are multiple studies and overall survival rates are less after taking it. Sure some have good results but in the aggregate, the results say you are better without it.

The only reason why we keep hearing about it is because Trump made such a stink about it. His followers are trying to save Trumps face by shoehorning in the positives.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: B1G
A family friend just took it. She’s probably close to 70 and good health. Doc told her it would cut down the length of her symptoms. She said 3 days later she was fine. Now I don’t know if it was the HCQ or just her good health. Either way, she’s not dead and feels great

CSB for sure.
 
This black comedy would be amusing if it weren’t for the fact that on 21 March, when Trump first promoted HCQ + AZM, there had only been 376 deaths in the US and as of 5 July there have been 132,601. Almost all of those deaths, arguably, were avoidable.

So, yet another miracle cure that people around the world aren’t taking because they want to allow the liberals in America to stick it to Trump? If only some doctor would tell the family members of the 130,000 American dead.

However, I will not take it in lieu my regimen of essential oils and crystals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ping72
There are multiple studies and overall survival rates are less after taking it. Sure some have good results but in the aggregate, the results say you are better without it.

The only reason why we keep hearing about it is because Trump made such a stink about it. His followers are trying to save Trumps face by shoehorning in the positives.
Those studies are flawed because people who were given the drug were often given it as a last resort and were already very sick. So you need to quit spouting old data. Google it.
 

The Spectator Australia

In the wee small hours before the dawn of the Independence Day holiday weekend, presumably when it hoped no one was watching, CNN quietly did its biggest backflip of the pandemic, tweeting: ‘A surprising new study found that the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) helped Covid-19 patients better survive in hospital.’

Surprising? Not to readers of The Spectator Australia where Rebecca Weisser first reported success of HCQ and Azithromycin (AZM), the dynamic drug duo, on 28 March. The study, published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, reported that HCQ combined with Azithromycin reduced the risk of dying by a stunning 71 per cent compared with no treatment at all and could have ‘an important role to play in reducing Covid-19 mortality.’

What was surprising was that CNN finally felt compelled to report the good news. Ever since President Trump first dubbed the drug combo a ‘GAME CHANGER!’ and ‘a gift from God,’ he has been derided and the drug demonised. This time, there was no mention of Trump, much less an apology.

Over the past few months, in nine of her regular columns, Ms Weisser has followed the fortunes of HCQ + AZM as a cure for the coronavirus.

It reads like a modern-day morality tale, in which two poor but honest, generic drugs, so highly regarded that they feature on the World Health Organisation’s model list of essential medicines, are bravely championed or vexatiously villainised by a Chaucerian cast of heroes and villains.

Red Ted (Tedros) Adhanom, the mad Marxist running the WHO, didn’t even want to test HCQ as a cure for Covid, despite concrete evidence that it was effective against the new virus. When Professor Didier Raoult, a Gallic wizard with an uncanny resemblance to Getafix in the Asterix and Obelix books, unlocked the magical potency of HCQ by combining it with AZM, it should have been, as he said, fin de partie, game over.

But the enemies of HCQ were just warming up.

Lancetgate revealed that a company called Surgisphere had manufactured fake data to claim, wrongly as it turned out, that the combination of HCQ and AZM was in fact a killer. The results were published in the once highly-respected British medical journal, the Lancet, but it was the peer review conducted on Twitter that uncovered the fraud and forced a retraction. Britons were subjected to an even worse fate; a massive dose of HCQ which was described by a leading French authority on infectious diseases as ‘super toxic.’

This black comedy would be amusing if it weren’t for the fact that on 21 March, when Trump first promoted HCQ + AZM, there had only been 376 deaths in the US and as of 5 July there have been 132,601. Almost all of those deaths, arguably, were avoidable. Treated early, even centenarians in nursing homes with several co-morbidities have survived. A safe vaccine would be nice but is not essential. We can live with a treatable virus — work, study, travel, go to concerts, sports arenas, houses of worship — and get on with our lives.

Trump has been spectacularly vindicated yet that is unlikely to put an end to the shenanigans of Big Pharma, Big Media and Big Partisans who have no interest in letting him get back to making America great again

LINK
At this point there is little doubt HCQ (and Zn) is extremely effective. Some people just don't want to admit it.
 
Yur, dumb. Are you afraid to take it? Weird.

It’s saved my wife’s 98 y/o grandfather’s life after he was left to die and his family insisted that they at least try it.
Definitely not scared, there’s better treatments out there. If your taking HCQ it’s only because Trump praised it so much. There are better drugs, google it.
 
No. It works, with minimal side effects when taken in the correct dosage.
But is it the best? The end all be all? Remdesivir results are much more promising. Why would any one choose HCQ (which has mixed results at best) when there are better options?
 
But is it the best? The end all be all? Remdesivir results are much more promising. Why would any one choose HCQ (which has mixed results at best) when there are better options?
The study that said it was worse used like 4 times the recommended dosage. How does that even happen? Outrageous.
 
This is like those annoying drug ads on TV. Just send the studies to the doctors and let them decide with their patients what to take. This isn’t something non-medical people should even debate. No one would even have an opinion on this if Trump hadn’t politicized this virus for personal gain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJ13579
This is like those annoying drug ads on TV. Just send the studies to the doctors and let them decide with their patients what to take. This isn’t something non-medical people should even debate. No one would even have an opinion on this if Trump hadn’t politicized this virus for personal gain.
Uumm...the Dr prescribed it but administrators overruled him.
 
It works, with minimal side effects when taken in the correct dosage.

It's effective when taken with Zinc or AZM early after the infection. It's not effective after cytokine storm. It's not a cure. The combination is supposed to inhibit replication of the virus in the respiratory tract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coloradonoles
Uumm...the Dr prescribed it but administrators overruled him.
Anyone who has ever filled a prescription knows that’s BS. There is no mechanism for hospital administrators to overrule a prescription. You take the paper from your doctor to your pharmacy and it’s filled. The pharmacist doesn’t call the hospital administration to make sure they are OK with it. You got conned again.
 
Anyone who has ever filled a prescription knows that’s BS. There is no mechanism for hospital administrators to overrule a prescription. You take the paper from your doctor to your pharmacy and it’s filled. The pharmacist doesn’t call the hospital administration to make sure they are OK with it. You got conned again.

The example provided would be inpatient pharmacy. Of course, we have no way to prove any of the tweet is real, but every right wing conspiracy theorist is going nuts in the comments.
 
Helps keep the virus out of the lungs...but Trump touted it so libs don’t care.
 
Who’s dumber? People that will take an ineffective drug because Trump said to? Or people that refuse to take an effective drug because Trump said to?
 
Who’s dumber? People that will take an ineffective drug because Trump said to? Or people that refuse to take an effective drug because Trump said to?
I’d say ingesting Drano or fish tank cleaner is dumber, but libs will blame Trump for their stupidity, and refuse a safe and effective vaccine.
 
I’d say ingesting Drano or fish tank cleaner is dumber, but libs will blame Trump for their stupidity, and refuse a safe and effective vaccine.

There’s no doubt the fish tank people are the dumbest but no one actually told them to ingest that. They’re just that effing stupid.
 
At this point there is little doubt HCQ (and Zn) is extremely effective. Some people just don't want to admit it.

96251301_10217190209254926_7283404217706872832_n.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT