The debate for Starocci over Parris is laughable. As happy as I was for Brands AAing, the fact that he took 5th, while Schultz took 7th should show how wide the gap in talent between the two weights actually was. Mind you FALLS are supposed to be the top criteria and that wasn’t even close…
Parris 33-0 w/ 11 FALLS, 3 TF’s and 7 MDs. The TF over Cass being the one match that should easily have won him the Hodge.
Starocci. 24-0 w/ 4 FALLS, 3 TF’s and 9 MDs. Pinning Labriola in the Finals is really the ONLY solid argument to put him in true contention.
Parris 33-0 w/ 11 FALLS, 3 TF’s and 7 MDs. The TF over Cass being the one match that should easily have won him the Hodge.
Starocci. 24-0 w/ 4 FALLS, 3 TF’s and 9 MDs. Pinning Labriola in the Finals is really the ONLY solid argument to put him in true contention.