Their QB put his name in the portal but agreed to still play (mutual decision with KW) both starting WR did not play and both starting safeties did not play as well along with 2 of the starting oline who declared for the draft and were out. Probably personal interpretation of what counts as valuable to how you play in a game.
Honest Question: What's the Point of Bringing Back All our Studs on Defense?
- Thread starter IowasLaw
- Start date
Don’t you ever tire of saying the same thing over and over again
Yeah. It's a shitty program. Iowa and its fans need to stop using them as a reason to fear change. Especially when it comes to the albatross that Iowa's offense has become. 90+% of the fanbase want Kirk to stick around and hire a capable OC. The ones that don't understand that are beyond help and have shown themselves to be Brian/Kirk fans as opposed to Iowa fans. Hopefully they move over to the North Liberty High School site along with Brian and we won't have to talk about him anymore.
Suspect you mean Whittingham? Kyle Whittingham has been Utah's HC for 18 years, runs his program very similar to Kirk in many ways.
Disgusting take. KF and everyone else in that building disagrees.
Right now, the only thing that matters is the bowl game
Oh I still watch of course.
Just as a fan, in this particular circumstance, I’m more interested about the new OC and any potential changes to the offense.
We should just quit football basically is what you are saying.
I was referring more to the take that iowaslaw was taking.
I will watch every game and root for them. It would perhaps be more accurate to state that in this particular instance I’m more interested in the OC search than the bowl game because of the bigger potential impact.
I'm with you on this, I am just more concerned about the OC as well
I will root for a win on Jan 1st but I am more interested in seeing if a Howard, Buie, or god forbid Lainez gets some reps.
I'm pretty sure he's referring to who the OC and transfers might be next season. He was responding to Mr Law.
Anybody not named Brian Ferentz and to a lesser extent, not on the current staff, gives me hope.
Are you crazy man!!! Who needs all of these defensive stars coming back??
To win games. 3 words to answer an essay that is a joke
Absolutely not. The players who give Iowa the best chance to win will be on the field
I thought Big West was the worst division in history? Surely an 8 win PAC 12 team would easily dispose of pesky little NW, regardless. NW dominated the shit out of Utah. Dumb ****s like you go out of your way to make excuses for other teams while ignoring the fact that Iowa was hurt by key injuries as badly as any team in the country. We played NW without our starting QB, numerous O-lineman, 2 All American caliber Tight Ends and one of the most talented, electric Db in the country. We still beat them.
This is an asinine post. So absurd it's not even worth reading, which I didn't.
We live, love, breathe, eat, and sleep with our defense. Iowa goes as its defense goes whether anyone agrees with it or not. It's the only thing keeping us in a reasonable stratosphere within the upper echelons of college football.
So why wouldn't we want our best players to stay for as long as possible? We want to be competitive don't we? Without our Defense, Iowa would be extremely lucky to break .500 over the last three years.
We live, love, breathe, eat, and sleep with our defense. Iowa goes as its defense goes whether anyone agrees with it or not. It's the only thing keeping us in a reasonable stratosphere within the upper echelons of college football.
So why wouldn't we want our best players to stay for as long as possible? We want to be competitive don't we? Without our Defense, Iowa would be extremely lucky to break .500 over the last three years.
This “Iowa Law” guy really a lawyer? If so, he should stick to the law and give up on analyzing football.
Wait. If you didn't read it, then how could you classify it as asinine, or anything for that matter...? 🤔
We play a weak non conf next year. We pick up Washington at home and they are turning over 50 players. We pick up UCLA and they have not been that great. Yes we pick up OSU but no PSU and no Michigan. We get Wisky at home.
All told our schedule might be similar to this year and if a loaded D comes back and our new OC gives us a unit that produces positive results this could be real fun.
This years bowl game means absolutely nothing especially if Deacon Hill starts and plays the whole game at QB. I’d be more interested if he started at RG. The new OC , KF’s philosophy on the offense going forward and recruiting on the offensive side of the ball especially QB is what is important.
Listen you worthless cumdumpster I never said anyone should of, why or could of beat anyone nor saying anything about injuries opt outs as to why someone wins. If you could actually read everything and not let your small pea brained mind automatically jump to conclusions and a safe space I was pointing out Utah had more out than cm realized hence the last sentence I wrote about its up to the individual on what they think counts. Not once did I SAY THAT WAS THE REASON NW WON.
Last edited:
Troy and ISU are not weak non conference opponents.
So your agenda for the program is more important than what the team is actually going through right now. Gotcha
Wasn't too hard to determine based on the headline. I also know IowaLaws previous history of writing essays that could be summed up into one paragraph.
Our offense will be better next year.
said the same people on this board for the last 5 years....
Attrition is attrition and there will always be kids that move along for whatever reason. We know for sure that JH and NJ will come back, but will CDJ, SC, or even QS? JH may take a stab at the NFL. I'm probably missing a couple of other guys on D that will come back, possibly the DT from IWCC?
Iowa is losing some players on O, probably more after the bowl game. As the roster stands isn't Iowa over the limit by 6 or 7 even with portal kids?
