ADVERTISEMENT

How Does Iowa become a Michigan, Ohio St, Alabama?

Different conferences but Nebraska basically filled in the great plaines/western midwest power void that was created when Evy moved to be the AD and Minnesota decided to stop caring about football.

I mentioned Howard Jones earlier. Iowa was a juggernaut under him for a portion of the same time that Notre Dame was a juggernaut under Rockne. The Irish were able to replace their coach with a decent one pretty quickly after Rockne died. Iowa wasn’t able to find another great one for about three decades. Imagine what happens if those situations swapped. Or imagine if Jones stayed until 1940 when he coached his last season for USC.

Iowa went from worst to a number one ranking in the span of 6 years with Fry. Compare Urban Meyer with John Cooper.
Coaches matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternal Return
The only way to get to that level is by winning like Iowa did between 2002 and 2004 almost every year for a couple decades. By then, the tradition would be established and then it would just depend on getting and keeping the right coaches. It's not going to happen until a miracle coach comes along. Then again, look at ISU this year. Hell, if they can beat two teams ranked in the top 5 after never having done that in their history, I say anything's possible. What's sad is that if Campbell stays for a long time, Iowa will wind up being the "other" school in the state.

In an alternate universe, Ferentz took the Cleveland Browns coaching job after winning the Orange Bowl after the 2009-2010 season and Urban Meyer thought it might be fun to see if he could take a program with Iowa's history to a national championship.
 
I wonder if the NCAA would ever consider another scholarship reduction in the future. Cut the scholarship count down to 75 and require that they be 4 year guarantees. That suddenly puts a bit of a crimp on Bama, OSU, etc. from stockpiling talent down to their third and fourth strings and keeps schools like Bama from “cutting” players that were overrated in recruiting. Although the reduced scholarship count could have an undesired affect of hurting developmental programs like ours.
 
Maybe convince a few million more young people to move to Iowa so we are not at such a recruiting disadvantage? Convince recruits global warming is real and Iowa’s climate will be like Alabama’s when they are here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Underscore2
It IS much harder to do at Iowa, but not impossible. But I believe a bit of luck would need to come our way as far as timing.

That luck is for Nebraska, Wisconsin...generally speaking, no other upper midwest programs being good to great at the same time Iowa has a great coach that can corral ALL the good players in our region.

Back when Nebraska made their name (say late 60's to roughly when Fry arrived), name me the other programs in our geographical area that were also great consistently. The answer is nobody. They had a good 15 year head start on everybody in the region and were able to expand their footprint nationally to when Iowa did start having success, it didn't really affect them for roughly 20 years. Then Barry arrived in Madison...hell, Snyder at K-State too...the rest is history.

Remember when Nebraska "built their empire"? Look at the other programs and show me the great program Nebraska had to go up against regionally.

Minnesota? Nope
Wisconsin? Nope
Iowa and Iowa State? Nope
Missouri? Nope
Illinois and NW? Nope
Kansas and K-State? Nope

They were the only one...

Ya, Nebraska had to go up against perennial power Oklahoma annually in the Big 8, Big 12. Both teams won multiple national championships.

Nebraska won 5 national championships in the 70s and 90s and generally finished 1st or 2nd in their conference/division in the 1960s through 2016..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nebraska_Cornhuskers_football_seasons
 
It’s really easy.

Step 1. Invent time machine
Step 2. Keep time machine a secret so that no other school can use it.
Step 3. Go back in time and convince Howard Jones to stay at Iowa for the next few decades and not go to a no football tradition school like USC.
Step 4. Go back in time and convince Evy that being an AD isn’t any fun and that he should continue being a football coach for the next couple of decades.
Step 5. Profit.

Others since I’m a BBall fan too...
Step 6. Go back in time and stop the car accident that took Bucky O’Connor’s life.
Step 7. Go back in time and produce proof that Connie Hawkins was innocent and let him play 3 years for our basketball team. While you’re at it stop the 4 starters from being declared ineligible during the season that year.

Realistically, it will never happen for us. The only slight possibility is if ISU disbanded and merged with us and Kinnick is expanded to 100k seats.

Honestly with the way big time college athletics has been going over the past couple of decades, we’re more likely to fall back to an average or worse program than we are to ascend to blue blood status. Our fan base will not allow cheating and we won’t drop to lower academic standards like SEC schools.
You make some good points on keeping those great coaches longer. What Jones and Evy did in their runs . . .

If you're bringing up car accidents and the basketball team, there's at least one more you should prevent while you're at it.

F#ck it. I don't want to be a bama, OSU or Mich.

I happen to like our brand.

I'd rather be the big 10 bully than the debutante of the East with the best team money can buy.

OP.....are you an Iowa native?
I'd love to get back to being the Big Ten's bully. Hasn't been the case for a while now.
 
Create bogus classes (but make sure any student can take them) in order to recruit talented but academically challenged athletes.

Oh wait....that only works for North Carolina basketball. Never mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Underscore2
Create bogus classes (but make sure any student can take them) in order to recruit talented but academically challenged athletes.

Oh wait....that only works for North Carolina basketball. Never mind.

Incorrect.


It works for other NC sports too, not just the basketball team.
 
I figure the only way for Iowa to reach this level is to get an elite coach that is somehow tied to Iowa and he wants to be here...i.e. he used to play/coach at Iowa, or is originally from Iowa and he luvs his hawks. I luv my hawks but that ship has sailed as I tapped out after freshman football. Will one of you start spending 24 hours a day learning how to coach/recruit kids and work your way up through the ranks to coach our hawks to a national championship(s)? TIA.
Yes, I love meatloaf! My favorite is grandma's cause she uses some onion n celeary. You?
 
I laugh at the folks that just say "we need to have a winning attitude." Good lord, look at facts.

Population of states

Ohio - 11.6M
Michigan - 9.9M
Pennsylvania - 12.8M
Iowa - 3.1M

And if you further break down the demographics of high school age persons and African-American populations, the numbers are even more against Iowa. Not only does the state of Iowa have a much lower population than those other states, the percent of high school age kids, and African-Americans as the percentage of the population is also lower than those states. Yes, Iowa is adjacent to Illinois and its 12.8M population. But Illinois is also close enough to other big powers that everyone feels like Illinois is their territory.

Iowa has massive disadvantages to overcome with the elite programs in the country. It's not complaining or whining, it's just reality. The most-important factors for most recruits are proximity to home, opportunity to play and winning. The order may be different for some guys, but those are the biggest factors. The state of Ohio produces so much talent every year that the Buckeyes can go without offering a Leshun Daniels or a Sean Welch. If those guys played in Iowa as high schoolers, they would have been among the top 1-2 players in the state of Iowa.

Could Iowa do better in recruiting? Of course. But KF has built a program that allows Iowa -- when its best players are upperclassmen and injuries/schedule are favorable -- to compete with the big boys. By building the program with an emphasis on winning in the trenches, it allows Iowa to compete with elite teams and turn games into a fistfight. Is the formula perfect? No. Do I wish Iowa recruited just a bit better skill position talent to better compete? Of course. It is disappointing to see the success Wisconsin has had this decade compared to Iowa with a similar formula but better skill talent. But even Wisconsin has 5.7M population with a single P5 school in the state, compared to Iowa's 3.1M in a state shared with another P5 school.

Suggesting that the only thing holding back Iowa from being better is trying harder or just wanting to is silly. Nebraska has been demanding that "we are better than this" for nearly 2 decades now, and they are running into the same demographic realities as the rest of the teams in low-population states. The country's demographics are changing, and not to the benefit of schools in the Midwest. It's why Delaney looked to expand to areas like New Jersey and would probably take Texas if given the chance. The B1G needs to expand the footprint for long-term viability, unless the population patterns move away from the south and west to the north. But that isn't likely to happen.

You make a lot of great points but first and foremost, I really think it starts with the school's high school recruiting base. Using OSU as an example, the school has a huge advantage over many other schools as they can pretty much field an excellent team with just Ohio HS talent. More than population, I really believe the quality of HS football being played in the state takes center stage first and foremost. Schools that have to travel hundreds of miles out of necessity to pull in recruits are at a HUGE disadvantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B1G
Minnesota used to be there (multiple national championships) and they are still trying to figure out how to make themselves great again.
 
This is why. Of the Top 331 recruits for 2017, Ohio had 16, Alabama 15, Michigan 10 - Iowa 2 (the States, not the schools). And that's just "blue chip" recruits. If you list the kids just below blue chip status (whatever that is), the disparity gets worse.


https://www.sbnation.com/college-fo...rankings-state-stars-florida-texas-california

Stop bringing facts to the argument. It's much more fun to just claim that if we had a coach who just cared more or paid more attention to recruiting Iowa would win 10+ games every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
You make a lot of great points but first and foremost, I really think it starts with the school's high school recruiting base. Using OSU as an example, the school has a huge advantage over many other schools as they can pretty much field an excellent team with just Ohio HS talent. More than population, I really believe the quality of HS football being played in the state takes center stage first and foremost. Schools that have to travel hundreds of miles out of necessity to pull in recruits are at a HUGE disadvantage.

Totally agree. The baseline for Ohio State is anywhere from really good (when they have a coach like Earle Bruce or John Cooper) to legitimate content for national title every year (with a coach like Tressel or Meyer). The combination of talent close by and support from alumni/administration makes the Bucks really, really good. I do think Urban is a very good coach, but Buckeyes start the at-bat already having hit a triple.
 
To answer the OP's question- to become an Alabama or Ohio State you need to hire the best recruiter/head coach who is committed to staying at the program and winning a NC. Both Saban and Meyer could win a NC at Iowa because they recruit nationally and players come (wherever they are) to play for them because recruits believe they WILL WIN a NC and get them into the league as a high draft pick.

To become a Michigan, the Hawkeyes would have to deteriorate significantly from their current state- I would wager that the Hawkeyes have a significantly better program (based on wins and losses) than Michigan over the past 10 years.

Looked it up myself- your already better than Michigan- don't get caught up in Michigan's success from the 1800's- they've been irrelevant for decades.


Past 10 years
Michigan 72-50
Iowa 79-46, plus you've been to 3 more bowl games than Michigan in that span
Ohio State 107-20
 
Last edited:
To answer the OP's question- to become an Alabama or Ohio State you need to hire the best recruiter/head coach who is committed to staying at the program and winning a NC. Both Saban and Meyer could win a NC at Iowa because they recruit nationally and players come (wherever they are) to play for them because recruits believe they WILL WIN a NC and get them into the league as a high draft pick.

I would tend to disagree, Saban was nothing special at MSU, he became St. NICK when he resided in recruiting hot beds like LSU and Alabama.
 
Pay the players...institute a Draft for the top 250 or 500 players based on last years final standings.
 
Last edited:
Pay the players...institute a Draft for the top 250 or 500 players based on last years final standings.
Paying players would be the death knell for Iowa football. Do you really think the University would give the ok to do this? The Liberal Arts folks would have a conniption.
 
Simple - we don't.

Michigan - Nope, never. They have the largest alumni base in the world and from that comes boosters and donors we can only dream of. Isn't Mary Sue still there?

Ohio State - Nope. Too much tradition to overcome and cannot happen when we have the Clones in our backyard. O$U gets the support of the entire State of Ohio. United they Stand. Divided Iowa Falls. Not to mention they would step on their grandmother's back to win another Nat'l Championship. Is that who we want to be? That being said, Jim Tressel was a good guy who tried to do it right.

Alabama - They pretty much are the Mafia of College Football. Their system works and they have exactly the right people at the top with a Booster system that gives them the lifeblood they need and help them remain "Untouchable."

So where does that leave Iowa? I say we have a good leader who does things the right way and we as Iowan's should be proud. Do we want to win more? Of course we do but I would venture the majority of Iowan's who pay taxes would say let's win but do it the right way.

The benchmark we should probably set is Wisconsin. Basically, keep the morals/ethics of a Ferentz led program with the power run game and consistent 10-win seasons they enjoy.

I find it odd to say that we can't be Michigan but could be Wisconsin. Wisconsin has been a much better program than Michigan from 1997 on, that's not a small sample size anymore, two decades. Iowa had several chances to become an upper echelon B10 team like Wisconsin in the past 10+ years but has repeatedly blown those chances as we have a complacent head coach who has been too lazy to make the moves needed to make that leap.
 
Paying players would be the death knell for Iowa football. Do you really think the University would give the ok to do this? The Liberal Arts folks would have a conniption.
Oh, its coming, pay to play will be here in some shape or form, financed by the NCAA and Conference TV and merchandising revenue. Its only a matter of time before the lawyers take it here.

Just say'n...lots of rumblings the last few years about how the NCAA makes so much money on the backs of these elite players, interferes with their right to earn a living, share in the money.

Pay to Play and NCAA draft or something like it will be the only way there will be parity and fairness in recruiting. The Big Money will insist on it. Otherwise, it will always be the same local southern schools, blue blood northern schools, high population states, getting the cream of the crop.

Things could get better or easier for Iowa if Berry retried and Wisky keeps losing their defensive coaches and they make sh!tty hires to replace them (self destructed like Debby did). While we are at it, lets make sure Campbell moves outside the Big Ten or maybe Rutgers. Flake will likely self destruct as well but the sooner the better. Oh, and the stars align, prayers are answered...and then, every 2 to 4 years, Iowa would have a shot at a Regular Top 8 Play Off, even better if expanded to top 16. Then recruits might regularly see Iowa among the elite teams.

It will never be, as some here suggest, some new "elite level" coach who is a super charismatic recruiter. I am certain about that. Hayden was pretty darn close to that, and he couldn't get ranked in the top 10 as often as Kirk has.
 
Last edited:
Nebraska won titles with 2 different coaches. Neither of whom demanded a contract giving them a 2.25 million bonus for winning 7 games. Attitude and expectations of self do matter. You're a fool to believe otherwise.
That was 30 years ago. Also, I'm unaware of any coach getting a 2.25 million bonus for winning 7 games in one year. I also don't know of any coaches who "demanded" such a thing. Good try on the troll though.
 
I think it has to do with tradition, but also fan base. I mean you look at OSU & Michigan and there is some of the most passionate fans in the country. I mean they draw something like 40-50k for a spring game. Iowa has good fans, but if they start to lose, the fans don't show up. I mean I went to an Iowa vs Michigan in Ann Arbor and that place was packed. It always is. Went to Iowa vs PSU this year and there were a lot of empty seats for a "primetime" game. That's not good support for the program.

Bama, OSU, and MICH are recruiting on a different level than anyone else right now. They are getting the cream of the crop and it will go in cycles. I think coaching has to do with some of that, but lets face it we live in a society where student athletes will always choose the "easy" way out. I mean you could go to Bama and win a NC or come to Iowa and maybe contend for BTC by your junior or senior year. Its just the way the program is. AJE are few and far between anymore. Those type of players will go where they think they win a NC.

Iowa is a development program who every so often will have a 10-2 or 11-1 type of year. Sadly those years are usually 4-5 years apart. They are always going to be between 9-3 or 6-6. I guess I look at is, we could be a development program and average 6-8 wins a year or do we want to be a "flash in the pan" type of team. Where we win 10-11 games for a string of 2-3 seasons and then don't make a bowl game for a while.

I think the program is just fine at Iowa. Yea we are not OSU, Bama, or MiCH but it makes it sweeter beating them with less talent. We also graduate more of our players and our program is "clean" compared to the others. I guess we are doing it right at Iowa and I am okay with that. I think KF will get us back to the BTC within the next 2-3years.
 
Older guys may remember just how bad Kansas State was before Bill Snyder arrived.It was the worst program in the country.It took him awhile but he finally had that team on the cusp of the National Title.Players in the program and fan support changed with him.His out of conference schedule was a complete joke but he was getting them to taste victory before he could teach them how to build on it.Probably one of the best rebuild jobs I ever saw
 
It all comes down to the commitment of your boosters to infuse $$$$. It takes great fan support, big time environment, and exposure. Until you recruit the best you'll always be at the almost great, kind of good program. Recruit ....recruit....recruit. Enough of this poor old Iowa stuff. Act like you belong there with Ohio State and aim to not just win but destroy! If you don't well hey you still got the Chicken Nuggets Bowl.

Stagnation is a terrible thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott559
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT