Several reasons. Mainly that Methodists are more concerned with the spirit of the biblical lessons and hence more open and forgiving to non-believers. Baptists are more legalistic and precisely literal in their approach and hence more closed and judgmental.
Did you point out a score? Because I've been asking for just that and reading along and I didn't see one. Link it again for me please.
In your opinion. That whole summation is opinion. It's a generalization. You're not as Liberal as I thought.
Go back and read my previous posts. It was all covered before your first reply to me.
I don't think you know what liberal or opinion means. You are forever in need of a dictionary in every conversation we have.
That's because even THOSE are subject to individual interpretation. You've been playing your game too long. Playing games can be fun, so I get the attraction.
No it wasn't. You're still running with ice cream. Give me the law they passed. Give me the court case they won. Then show how supporting libertarians would have gotten me victories across the nation faster than supporting liberals. You have a practicality problem. Following your path doesn't lead to the reality I want. Following my path empirically does.
You can't point out reality to the delusional my friend. I'm sure you're a fine person, but your politics and love for the corrupted system are delusional. Libertarians understand the world is harsh, cruel and unfair. They see the reality of it all. Hence, why they laugh at the control freak natures of the left and the right. It's really egotistical and entirely to close to religious fanaticism. Which both sides decry depending on which religion you are speaking of.
Indeed, he's a control freak by nature, so therefore everyone thinks like him and if they do not, they are strange. When he says liberal, is he speaking todays liberal, yesterday liberal, hardcore liberal, relaxed liberal, liberal socialist, libertarian leaning liberal, NeoLiberal, etc?
I didn't get ice cream, Kiting left me on the field pointing to the score board. Your reading comprehension is poor too.
Okay, it's cute how you're sorta fixated on trying to place this football game metaphor on this subject. But, I'm sort of wondering if you're aware that a football game and social behavior dictated through government are NOT the same thing. If it helps you relate to it, fine... I guess. But, trying to equivocate everything into some kind of football metaphor is making me question your rationality. I don't need it simplified like that. I hope you don't approach your views through this filter all the time.
Of course we do. You're convinced you're superior to others. It's not flattering, so you refuse to admit it. Whereas I embrace it. It helps me transcend it.
He should be happy that Libertarian principles have helped to ease the angst between us and Iran. Despite him claiming it's a 'liberal' victory, it is Libertarian principles shining in this moment.
You're arguing against me, yet you would likely agree with the end game on most issues that we speak of. So yes, it is a problem for you at the moment. At least it appears to be.
Nope, having a good time isn't a problem for me at all. People who think like you do will either stay home or waste a vote on Gary Johnson. You wont count. So there is nothing to lose by pointing out you don't count. It's all upside. You either prove me right or you start counting which proves me right too. Ridiculing third parties is all upside.
Your love for being a simple and unquestioning cog in the systematic machine of elitism just doesn't interest me. I like to run at my own pace and enjoy all others being able to do the same.
Well, the labels are misleading anyway. Liberals, libertarians, liberators, liberty, is all semantics.
I really don't even like to use the label Libertarian to be honest. It just seems to be too confusing to some for me not to at least give them a category whether real or not.
How would you know? It's all just semantics to you after all. Up is down, left is right, it must take you all day to order breakfast.
I doubt it, Libertarians don't feel the need to stick with just one side of the menu, because they like the freedom to pick any item despite where it resides on the menu. They think for themselves and therefore they know what they want without being told.
I know. This is the problem with your type. You always think you're a special little snowflake who need not follow the rules. It give you a cute boy like charm. Probably helps get you laid. I get why you work the angle.
Great, then it's very liberal to deride someone's choice for who they believe is the candidate for an elected office and voting for them is a waste... if it's not one of the two major parties. Thanks for teaching me Liberalism.
Nein, our 'types', you're becoming a politcist as we type, think that everyone is a special little snowflake. What's the point of joining into groups at the most animalistic and instinctual levels of thinking? Answer that question and you'll evolve with a thought.
