ADVERTISEMENT

How will Lia Thomas do at Swimming Nationals?

NCAA Division I Championship Meet
2022 NCAA Division I Women's
Swimming & Diving Championships

Event 17 Women 100 Yard Freestyle
==================================================================
NCAA: N 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
Meet: M 45.56 3/17/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
American: A 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
US Open: O 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
Pool: P 46.70 3/19/2016 Olivia Smoliga, Georgia
Name Year School Seed Prelims
==================================================================
=== Preliminaries ===

1 Walsh, Gretchen FR Virginia 46.78
r:+0.74 22.23 46.78 (24.55)
2 Berkoff, Katharine JR NCSU 46.89
r:+0.68 22.82 46.89 (24.07)
3 Scott, Morgan SR Alabama 47.27
r:+0.65 22.70 47.27 (24.57)
4 Thomas, Lia 5Y Penn 47.37
r:+0.74 23.11 47.37 (24.26)
5 Albiero, Gabi SO Louisville 47.45
r:+0.60 22.77 47.45 (24.68)
6 Countie, Grace SR UNC 47.50
r:+0.71 22.68 47.50 (24.82)
7 Dupre, Cora JR Alabama 47.51
r:+0.59 22.72 47.51 (24.79)
8 Henig, Iszac JR Yale 47.55
r:+0.64 22.88 47.55 (24.67)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9 Ivey, Isabel SR California 47.61
r:+0.69 22.71 47.61 (24.90)
10 MacNeil, Maggie SR Michigan 47.77
r:+0.63 22.99 47.77 (24.78)
I like how you keep posting this as if you’re making some grand point. You’re not. As if Lia Thomas doesn’t have an advantage if she’s not setting records or taking first. The data that is more telling is what Faulty Gator keeps posting. Where she was ranked in the 500’s competing against men, and now she’s making race finals.
 
Lia has the advantage of having broader shoulders, larger lungs, and being taller from going through male puberty. There are definitely differences between transgender and cis gender females that could provide an advantage in athletics. The questions we need to answer are: how often do transgender females compete in athletics, is their inclusion a significant threat to cis gender females being able to compete now and in the future, and if transgender females are not allowed to compete with cis gender females how and where do we give them the opportunity to compete. The Olympics have rules allowing transgender athletes to compete so athletes like swimmers will have to compete with them at the highest level of their sport.
Whether they are Olympic or NCAA rules, this situation and others like it before are bringing the idea of fairness to light at the highest level. You fully stated that from a physiological standpoint this swimmer has an advantage over female chromosome athlete. Is it an advantage? Of course it is otherwise you would not be seeing results such as this swimmer or Olympic lifters, or sprinters, or even the farce that has been in the MMA ring. You are either for fairness in women's sports, or you are not. There is no in-between on this and just because the rules haven't changed yet and they will, does not mean that they were based on any fairness quotient as a whole to female athletes. It is very obvious the advantages and Incredibly selfish on the point of that athlete. Of course this is my opinion and you will not agree. Understandable
 
Last edited:
I like how you keep posting this as if you’re making some grand point. You’re not. As if Lia Thomas doesn’t have an advantage if she’s not setting records or taking first. The data that is more telling is what Faulty Gator keeps posting. Where she was ranked in the 500’s competing against men, and now she’s making race finals.
The title of the thread is "How will Lia Thomas do at Swimming Nationals?" My post is answering the question.
 
Whether they are Olympic or NCAA rules, this situation and others like it before are bringing the idea of fairness to light at the highest level. You fully stated that from a physiological standpoint this swimmer has an advantage over female chromosome athlete. Is it an advantage? Of course it is otherwise you would not be seeing results such as this swimmer or Olympic lifters, or sprinters, or even the farce that has been in the MMA ring. You are either for fairness in women's sports, or you are not. There is no in-between on this and just because the rules haven't changed yet and they will, does not mean that they were based on any fairness quotient as a whole to female athletes. It is very obvious the advantages and Incredibly selfish on the point of that athlete. Of course this is my opinion and you will not agree. Understandable
I agree that transgender females have some physical advantage, the amount of that advantage varies with whether they went through puberty as a male. In Lia's case she did. My question is how do we deal with transgender athletes? We have 3 choices and none is perfect.
  • Transgender athletes must compete with their birth gender. (This results in not honoring their identity and exposing them to potential bullying)
  • Transgender athletes compete with the gender they identify. (This results in questions of fairness for cis gender women)
  • Transgender athletes compete in their own league. (Since the number is so small it would be practically impossible to create transgender competition for all sports at all levels. It also would be expensive since it would be serving very few people)
The NCAA could change transgender rules in the future like you believe they will, but the Olympics are worldwide and the US is a member of the committee not the ruler. Maybe the whole world will take the stand that you believe is correct, but until then transgender athletes will be eligible to compete in Olympic competition under certain restrictions.

I am a woman and I played sports so I know how important they are to female athletes. Right now I think the best solution is to continue with the current NCAA rules since there are so few examples of transgender females excelling in college athletics. The NCAA rules have been in place since 2011 and trans haven't dominated women's athletics. There are no M to F transgender athletes in the WNBA or NWSL.
 
What actions has Lia taken that need to be justified? She identified as a woman and did began hormone treatment in 2019. Because of Covid this is the first year she has competed as a woman. That's 3 years of treatment compared to the 1 required by the NCAA. She is following all the NCAA rules. Her actions don't need justification. Your beef should be with the NCAA if you have a problem with Lia swimming, she is following the rules.
Just because something is legal doesn't make it ethical. She could have chosen to not compete with unfair advantages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasyHawk
NCAA Division I Championship Meet
2022 NCAA Division I Women's
Swimming & Diving Championships

Event 17 Women 100 Yard Freestyle
==================================================================
NCAA: N 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
Meet: M 45.56 3/17/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
American: A 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
US Open: O 45.56 3/18/2017 Simone Manuel, Stanford
Pool: P 46.70 3/19/2016 Olivia Smoliga, Georgia
Name Year School Seed Prelims
==================================================================
=== Preliminaries ===

1 Walsh, Gretchen FR Virginia 46.78
r:+0.74 22.23 46.78 (24.55)
2 Berkoff, Katharine JR NCSU 46.89
r:+0.68 22.82 46.89 (24.07)
3 Scott, Morgan SR Alabama 47.27
r:+0.65 22.70 47.27 (24.57)
4 Thomas, Lia 5Y Penn 47.37
r:+0.74 23.11 47.37 (24.26)
5 Albiero, Gabi SO Louisville 47.45
r:+0.60 22.77 47.45 (24.68)
6 Countie, Grace SR UNC 47.50
r:+0.71 22.68 47.50 (24.82)
7 Dupre, Cora JR Alabama 47.51
r:+0.59 22.72 47.51 (24.79)
8 Henig, Iszac JR Yale 47.55
r:+0.64 22.88 47.55 (24.67)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9 Ivey, Isabel SR California 47.61
r:+0.69 22.71 47.61 (24.90)
10 MacNeil, Maggie SR Michigan 47.77
r:+0.63 22.99 47.77 (24.78)
I know you think you are making some sort of point with these times but the majority of people don't care. If there really wasn't an advantage for Lia she wouldn't be at nationals at all. She would be ranked equivalently as when she was a man.

People are not going to tolerate this as is being demonstrated by states passing laws. The blue states are too cowardly to stand up for women on this issue so it will take a while but it is going to eventually happen there as well. With much gnashing of teeth I'm sure but not even the majority of liberals think this is ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk_82
I agree that transgender females have some physical advantage, the amount of that advantage varies with whether they went through puberty as a male. In Lia's case she did. My question is how do we deal with transgender athletes? We have 3 choices and none is perfect.
  • Transgender athletes must compete with their birth gender. (This results in not honoring their identity and exposing them to potential bullying)
  • Transgender athletes compete with the gender they identify. (This results in questions of fairness for cis gender women)
  • Transgender athletes compete in their own league. (Since the number is so small it would be practically impossible to create transgender competition for all sports at all levels. It also would be expensive since it would be serving very few people)
The NCAA could change transgender rules in the future like you believe they will, but the Olympics are worldwide and the US is a member of the committee not the ruler. Maybe the whole world will take the stand that you believe is correct, but until then transgender athletes will be eligible to compete in Olympic competition under certain restrictions.

I am a woman and I played sports so I know how important they are to female athletes. Right now I think the best solution is to continue with the current NCAA rules since there are so few examples of transgender females excelling in college athletics. The NCAA rules have been in place since 2011 and trans haven't dominated women's athletics. There are no M to F transgender athletes in the WNBA or NWSL.
Bullshit

The best course of action. Is for state legislatures to take over and act the adult. Just like Iowa has done
 
Bullshit

The best course of action. Is for state legislatures to take over and act the adult. Just like Iowa has done
I disagree. I would prefer the NCAA step up and do the right thing. I hate always running to the government on these issues.
 
I know you think you are making some sort of point with these times but the majority of people don't care. If there really wasn't an advantage for Lia she wouldn't be at nationals at all. She would be ranked equivalently as when she was a man.

People are not going to tolerate this as is being demonstrated by states passing laws. The blue states are too cowardly to stand up for women on this issue so it will take a while but it is going to eventually happen there as well. With much gnashing of teeth I'm sure but not even the majority of liberals think this is ok.
As I stated before the thread title asks the question, my post answers.
 
Last edited:
Hate to break it to you but the NCAA is spineless.
They have stated that they might punish states that make legislation by not allowing post season events to be hosted in those states. The pressure needs to be on the NCAA to change its policy. I just hating to see our legit athletes punished.
 
They have stated that they might punish states that make legislation by not allowing post season events to be hosted in those states. The pressure needs to be on the NCAA to change its policy. I just hating to see our legit athletes punished.
They may think about doing something maybe sometime if maybe they have to do something.



The NCAA is spineless.
 
Bullshit

The best course of action. Is for state legislatures to take over and act the adult. Just like Iowa has done
Let's say they do and make laws similar to Iowa's law. If those laws hold up in court, what happens when a swimmer, track athlete, etc. qualifies for the Olympics and is required to compete against transgender athletes?
 
Last edited:
Just because something is legal doesn't make it ethical. She could have chosen to not compete with unfair advantages.
I don't agree. Lia competed as a male while transitioning in 2019. She began treatment and exceeded the requirements of the NCAA for hormone treatment. We can think it is not fair that she can compete with women, but there is nothing unethical about her journey.
 
I agree that transgender females have some physical advantage, the amount of that advantage varies with whether they went through puberty as a male. In Lia's case she did. My question is how do we deal with transgender athletes? We have 3 choices and none is perfect.
  • Transgender athletes must compete with their birth gender. (This results in not honoring their identity and exposing them to potential bullying)
  • Transgender athletes compete with the gender they identify. (This results in questions of fairness for cis gender women)
  • Transgender athletes compete in their own league. (Since the number is so small it would be practically impossible to create transgender competition for all sports at all levels. It also would be expensive since it would be serving very few people)
The NCAA could change transgender rules in the future like you believe they will, but the Olympics are worldwide and the US is a member of the committee not the ruler. Maybe the whole world will take the stand that you believe is correct, but until then transgender athletes will be eligible to compete in Olympic competition under certain restrictions.

I am a woman and I played sports so I know how important they are to female athletes. Right now I think the best solution is to continue with the current NCAA rules since there are so few examples of transgender females excelling in college athletics. The NCAA rules have been in place since 2011 and trans haven't dominated women's athletics. There are no M to F transgender athletes in the WNBA or NWSL.
Your first point is canceled by the fact that the bullying is going on now. Did you see the reaction to Lia’s winning? Why isn’t that taken into account in the other direction?
 
Your first point is canceled by the fact that the bullying is going on now. Did you see the reaction to Lia’s winning? Why isn’t that taken into account in the other direction?
Transgender people will likely not be received well by the public for quite some time or never. I don't expect crowds to react well whether it's a transgender female competing against females or a transgender woman competing against males. I just think physical bullying is more likely in a men's locker room than a women's locker room. Don't get me wrong women can be bullies especially with words, but men are more likely to do so physically.
 
I agree that transgender females have some physical advantage, the amount of that advantage varies with whether they went through puberty as a male. In Lia's case she did. My question is how do we deal with transgender athletes? We have 3 choices and none is perfect.
  • Transgender athletes must compete with their birth gender. (This results in not honoring their identity and exposing them to potential bullying)
  • Transgender athletes compete with the gender they identify. (This results in questions of fairness for cis gender women)
  • Transgender athletes compete in their own league. (Since the number is so small it would be practically impossible to create transgender competition for all sports at all levels. It also would be expensive since it would be serving very few people)
The NCAA could change transgender rules in the future like you believe they will, but the Olympics are worldwide and the US is a member of the committee not the ruler. Maybe the whole world will take the stand that you believe is correct, but until then transgender athletes will be eligible to compete in Olympic competition under certain restrictions.

I am a woman and I played sports so I know how important they are to female athletes. Right now I think the best solution is to continue with the current NCAA rules since there are so few examples of transgender females excelling in college athletics. The NCAA rules have been in place since 2011 and trans haven't dominated women's athletics. There are no M to F transgender athletes in the WNBA or NWSL.
The 3rd choice of developing a Trans only competition is by far the fairest way possible. It doesnt matter if there is a large or small pool of athletes.

When the person made a decision to Identify as in this case a female. (Scientifically they can never change genders). They are asking the female athletic community to accept years of training, muscle memory, competition as a naturally stronger and faster person. This by definition is not a fair thing to ask. This is also inherently selfish as competing is not a necessity when someone decides to identify as another sex. The Male to Female person does not NEED to participate. They choose to do so knowingly that they are stronger and faster. A selfish choice. That athlete should compete against like athletes. And if none - then they set the standard for those to come.
 
The 3rd choice of developing a Trans only competition is by far the fairest way possible. It doesnt matter if there is a large or small pool of athletes.

When the person made a decision to Identify as in this case a female. (Scientifically they can never change genders). They are asking the female athletic community to accept years of training, muscle memory, competition as a naturally stronger and faster person. This by definition is not a fair thing to ask. This is also inherently selfish as competing is not a necessity when someone decides to identify as another sex. The Male to Female person does not NEED to participate. They choose to do so knowingly that they are stronger and faster. A selfish choice. That athlete should compete against like athletes. And if none - then they set the standard for those to come.
The 3rd choice is the "fairest", but also the least likely to happen. There are too many factors making this unreasonable, numbers, costs, competition, etc.

I imagine in the US the decision will likely be decided by the courts especially since the proposed legislation in Iowa and other states really only applies for male to female transgender athletes. There will be court cases filed for discrimination. The current make up of the Supreme Court will probably side with individual states being able to require athletes to compete with their birth gender, but who knows they suprise us sometimes.

I have a question about Iowa's law, what happens when an Iowa college or university competes against a school from a state that allows transgender females to complete with women and the competition is held in Iowa?
 
The 3rd choice is the "fairest", but also the least likely to happen. There are too many factors making this unreasonable, numbers, costs, competition, etc.

I imagine in the US the decision will likely be decided by the courts especially since the proposed legislation in Iowa and other states really only applies for male to female transgender athletes. There will be court cases filed for discrimination. The current make up of the Supreme Court will probably side with individual states being able to require athletes to compete with their birth gender, but who knows they suprise us sometimes.

I have a question about Iowa's law, what happens when an Iowa college or university competes against a school from a state that allows transgender females to complete with women and the competition is held in Iowa?
They will lose. Biology is funny that way now matter what your feelings might be.

By the way if you are right and biology is ruled not to matter Title 9 is dead. The lawsuits will be men suing to be free if the restraints of Title 9. Why should male football players fund anything female if your argument is correct?
 
They will lose. Biology is funny that way now matter what your feelings might be.

By the way if you are right and biology is ruled not to matter Title 9 is dead. The lawsuits will be men suing to be free if the restraints of Title 9. Why should male football players fund anything female if your argument is correct?
That's not what I said they would rule, in fact I said the opposite. As far as girls sports ending because of transgender females that's not happening. As long as there are requirements for hormone therapy before males can compete with females it will remain rare. Do you seriously think there will be so many boys that are willing to undergo transition treatment for 1+ years just so they can compete against women that women's sports will no longer exist?
 

I see a lot of people saying the same thing this guy does. Basically we need to take a wait and see approach. Let’s gather more data. Trying to strike a balance of when it’s appropriate or not to begin competing based of scientific data of HRT, etc. That’s a real bummer for women that get beat by trans folk while we’re “gathering data.” How about we let them compete but they don’t officially place (or more appropriately don’t take the place of someone born a woman) until we’ve got the data and completed the studies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tfxchawk
I see a lot of people saying the same thing this guy does. Basically we need to take a wait and see approach. Let’s gather more data. Trying to strike a balance of when it’s appropriate or not to begin competing based of scientific data of HRT, etc. That’s a real bummer for women that get beat by trans folk while we’re “gathering data.” How about we let them compete but they don’t officially place (or more appropriately don’t take the place of someone born a woman) until we’ve got the data and completed the studies?
Did you read the ESPN article? It has some information about the changes in NCAA policy.
 
I’ve lost track of everyone’s links and articles on many HROT topics, this one included…which one are you referring to?
The one in the tweet I posted.

Here's the direct link.

 
The one in the tweet I posted.

Here's the direct link.


Ah, I thought here was a different one specifically taking about what I proposed.

This article references the inconsistency between the USA Swimming rules and current NCAA rules. What I understand is USA swimming rules are more restrictive. Do we know that’s the standard to equal footing? Does the science / data back it so we can put a fork in it and call it good? If so, everyone should adopt that standard (e.g. amateur, USA swimming, IOC, etc.). If not and we still need to to more analysis, I’m still for letting them compete but not take potential spots from women born as women.
 
Last edited:
Ah, I thought here was a different one specifically taking about what I proposed.

This article references the inconsistency between the USA Swimming rules and current NCAA rules. What I understand is USA swimming rules are more restrictive. Do we know that’s the standard to equal footing? Does the science / data back it so we can put a fork in it and call it good? If so, everyone should adopt that standard (e.g. amateur, USA swimming, IOC, etc.). If not and we still need to to more analysis, I’m still for letting them compete but not take potential spots from women born as women.
The way I understood the article is from now on the NCAA will defer to the National swimming rules which require 36 months of hormone treatment with their testosterone levels under 5 nanomoles per liter. They also have to go before an independent panel and prove they do not have a competitive advantage over their cisgender peers. Doesn't sound like something a person would do on a whim. The time commitment will in my opinion make the possibility of another transgender woman competing at the college level almost nil.
 
I agree that transgender females have some physical advantage, the amount of that advantage varies with whether they went through puberty as a male. In Lia's case she did. My question is how do we deal with transgender athletes? We have 3 choices and none is perfect.
  • Transgender athletes must compete with their birth gender. (This results in not honoring their identity and exposing them to potential bullying)
  • Transgender athletes compete with the gender they identify. (This results in questions of fairness for cis gender women)
  • Transgender athletes compete in their own league. (Since the number is so small it would be practically impossible to create transgender competition for all sports at all levels. It also would be expensive since it would be serving very few people)
The NCAA could change transgender rules in the future like you believe they will, but the Olympics are worldwide and the US is a member of the committee not the ruler. Maybe the whole world will take the stand that you believe is correct, but until then transgender athletes will be eligible to compete in Olympic competition under certain restrictions.

I am a woman and I played sports so I know how important they are to female athletes. Right now I think the best solution is to continue with the current NCAA rules since there are so few examples of transgender females excelling in college athletics. The NCAA rules have been in place since 2011 and trans haven't dominated women's athletics. There are no M to F transgender athletes in the WNBA or NWSL.
My opinion is if someone decides to change genders they need to understand they may have to give some things up….
 
Transgender people will likely not be received well by the public for quite some time or never. I don't expect crowds to react well whether it's a transgender female competing against females or a transgender woman competing against males. I just think physical bullying is more likely in a men's locker room than a women's locker room. Don't get me wrong women can be bullies especially with words, but men are more likely to do so physically.
This was the argument given by people who didn’t want grown men sharing bathrooms with little girls and the left went nuts. It cost North Carolina billions of dollars.
 
This was the argument given by people who didn’t want grown men sharing bathrooms with little girls and the left went nuts. It cost North Carolina billions of dollars.
Soooo ****ed up story about this.

I went up to MN this weekend to the inlaws and picked up a bunch of baby stuff they have been saving for us. My BIL coaches his daughters hockey team and they were recently at a tournament in Northern MN where a man dressed as a woman tried to kid nap the 11 year old goalie out of a ladies restroom at a gas station next to the hockey rink. Luckily she screamed, was heard, and the dad ****ing chased thr dude in a truck while calling the cops. I'm pretty easy going about people doing what makes them happy, but as a person who is about to have a daughter that ****ed me up.
 
Soooo ****ed up story about this.

I went up to MN this weekend to the inlaws and picked up a bunch of baby stuff they have been saving for us. My BIL coaches his daughters hockey team and they were recently at a tournament in Northern MN where a man dressed as a woman tried to kid nap the 11 year old goalie out of a ladies restroom at a gas station next to the hockey rink. Luckily she screamed, was heard, and the dad ****ing chased thr dude in a truck while calling the cops. I'm pretty easy going about people doing what makes them happy, but as a person who is about to have a daughter that ****ed me up.
Little girl was an obvious transphobe.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT