ADVERTISEMENT

Hunter Biden jury HAS reached a verdict

If Trump would have just STFU and laid relatively low for the last 3.5 years, the media MIGHT have reported more on Biden's pants pooping, memory failing, stuttering, muttering, lying etc just out of a lack of content.

We haven't even talked about Joe's pandering Juneteenth celebration at the WH where he looks completely lost, stumbled and mumbled through his speech and the MSM isn't going to bring it up because they can distract you with Convicted Felon Hunter Biden, Convicted Felon Donald Trump.
 
Sounds good, it exists, but can't disprove any of this:

As noted, she could not speak to the authenticity of any of the data on the device.

That information was obtained from online accounts/backups.
I do not see anyone arguing that Hunter was not a drug addict and had some serious problems.

But nothing on the laptop, or in the cloud data, points to any improprieties by POTUS, before or during his tenure in office.
 
It wasn't really a border bill it was a complete piece of crap joke

Odd, because core conservatives who are proponents of border security attested that it was the biggest border legislation to address the issues in several decades.

Included quite a bit of budget for increased manpower.

MAGAs and Trump pushed against it, because it removed a talking point for them. They are not interested in any solutions, simply perpetuating the problems for their own political talking points. It's why I no longer consider Republicans for any of my votes - they've demonstrated for me that they are not serious in solving anything.
 
This doesn’t affect me at all. Trump does not hurt my feelings or upset me due to him lying about f**king a porn star or having classified docs at Mar-a-Lago.

The kind of shit that catches my attention is people celebrating the life of a dude like George Floyd….

…People supporting the idea that White folks should inherently feel a sense of guilt for simply being White.

…People not taking a firm stand against transgender males competing with females…

…Not addressing the border so you can get more votes (from mainly illegals) and appease the groups screaming for equality and opportunity…

Those are a few notable topics/circumstances that have turned me against Joe.

You truly are brainwashed...Biden tried to address the border, but Trump nixed the idea. The rest is made up bullshit that idiots like you swallow like Trump's balls
 
Odd, because core conservatives who are proponents of border security attested that it was the biggest border legislation to address the issues in several decades.

Included quite a bit of budget for increased manpower.

MAGAs and Trump pushed against it, because it removed a talking point for them. They are not interested in any solutions, simply perpetuating the problems for their own political talking points. It's why I no longer consider Republicans for any of my votes - they've demonstrated for me that they are not serious in solving anything.
The leadership of the GOP knew a political scam when they saw one and that POS bill was going nowhere. Funny how 3 years after being in office Diapers Joe decided to tighten up the border a bit using exec orders.
 
As noted, she could not speak to the authenticity of any of the data on the device.

That information was obtained from online accounts/backups.
I do not see anyone arguing that Hunter was not a drug addict and had some serious problems.

But nothing on the laptop, or in the cloud data, points to any improprieties by POTUS, before or during his tenure in office.
You are so FOS. If you knew anything about the rules of evidence, you would have admitted you were wrong by now.
 
You are so FOS.
No; I'm reiterating to you what she testified to.

She performed NO forensic testing and was not qualified to address that point.
Go look that up, if you need a refresher.

You are continually befuddled by false right-wing talking points; perhaps change where you collect your news from.
 
Included quite a bit of budget for increased manpower.

Which is actually one of the major problems with that bill...

We do not need an increased budget and more manpower to handle an ever increasing volume of illegals. We need to reduce the volume of illegal border crossings and asylum applicants to a level that can be managed with the budget and the staffing that we have provided,.. When you have a leaky roof the solution is not to purchase more buckets and hire more bucket carriers,.. You fix the roof.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: HawkMD
The "leadership" of the GOP is fully under Trump's thumb.

Competent conservatives actually championed the bill that was laid out. Folks who had worked on border issues for years, and understood the problems.
The problem is Biden, he created the mess we are currently experiencing. ISIS terrorists are crossing on a daily basis. When the next terrorist attack happens, I hope Biden is held criminally liable.
 
You truly are brainwashed...Biden tried to address the border, but Trump nixed the idea. The rest is made up bullshit that idiots like you swallow like Trump's balls
Can you fill me in on this occurrence?

CNN: “Biden makes first visit to the Southern border as President, but does not appear to see or speak to any migrants.” - Jan of 2023

Lol. So…Joe pays no attention to the goddamn crisis for multiple years…Goes on a visit to an area not suffering from the actual crisis…then draws up a ‘border bill’ just months prior to election time???

People are seeing right through this stupid game.
 
Last edited:
Which is actually one of the major problems with that bill...

We do not need an increased budget and more manpower to handle an ever increasing volume of illegals. We need to reduce the volume of illegal border crossings and asylum applicants to a level that can be managed with the budget and the staffing that we have provided,.. When you have a leaky roof the solution is not to purchase more buckets and hire more bucket carriers,.. You fix the roof.
if you really think this (instead of just regurgitating what you've seen elsewhere) you're entirely misinformed

there are over 2 million asylum claims in process right now. the law says those claims need to be heard. the bill provided funding to hire more judges so that the huge backlog (that has existed for years and years) can be addressed.

right now there are 682 immigration judges. to process 2miilion+ claims. that's just under 3,000 per judge.

we need more judges. to claim otherwise - or to say funding for more judges is a reason to OPPOSE the bill - is just insane mental gymnastics
 
if you really think this (instead of just regurgitating what you've seen elsewhere) you're entirely misinformed

there are over 2 million asylum claims in process right now. the law says those claims need to be heard. the bill provided funding to hire more judges so that the huge backlog (that has existed for years and years) can be addressed.

right now there are 682 immigration judges. to process 2miilion+ claims. that's just under 3,000 per judge.

we need more judges.

Nope,.. we need less applicants.
 
if you really think this (instead of just regurgitating what you've seen elsewhere) you're entirely misinformed

there are over 2 million asylum claims in process right now. the law says those claims need to be heard. the bill provided funding to hire more judges so that the huge backlog (that has existed for years and years) can be addressed.

right now there are 682 immigration judges. to process 2miilion+ claims. that's just under 3,000 per judge.

we need more judges. to claim otherwise - or to say funding for more judges is a reason to OPPOSE the bill - is just insane mental gymnastics
We need more judges to let even MORE people in. No thanks.
 
right...those numbers don't exist

just ignore them and insist on the most simple, uncomplicated solution to a complicated problem

There are way more people wanting to come into this country than we can ever hire enough judges for,.. Think about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
There are way more people wanting to come into this country than we can ever hire enough judges for,.. Think about it.
that doesn't mean we don't have to deal with the claims that are already in the backlog

this is that legal immigration that people claim they support - you're supposed to at least pretend to support people with valid claims (as determined by the previously mentioned immigration judges) to be granted asylum...we need judges and an actually functional process to do that

also, the proposed bipartisan bill would have reformed the asylum process to make it tougher to apply and qualify for, and easier for people to be removed or deported...i'm sure this is now a reason the bill is bad too
 
that doesn't mean we don't have to deal with the claims that are already in the backlog

this is that legal immigration that people claim they support - you're supposed to at least pretend to support people with valid claims (as determined by the previously mentioned immigration judges) to be granted asylum...we need judges and an actually functional process to do that

also, the proposed bipartisan bill would have reformed the asylum process to make it tougher to apply and qualify for, and easier for people to be removed or deported...i'm sure this is now a reason the bill is bad too

He's full blown MAGA, they are completely brainwashed
 
Of course, but you have to start by stopping the flow,.. then you can begin to clean up the mess.
you understand that bills can do multiple things, right?

legislation is not just one sentence scribbled on a napkin.

you are setting all these things up as choices, when we don't acutally have to choose between more judges or a tougher asylum process or more border fencing or more detention beds or more funding for border agents...we can have all of them

in fact, if someone is serious about addressing a complicated, decades-long problem like our southern border, they know it's multi-faceted approaches that address root causes (like ambiguity or loopholes in the asylum process or severe lack of ability to process claims) that are needed

or we can just pretend that the simplest solution will do it, while ignoring the fact that the problem would have been long solved were that true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
We. Send. Them. Back.

Sorry not sorry you don’t like your life in El Salvador, Venezuela, or China…etc… maybe those countries should figure it the f**k out.
And we don't need you coming here voting for the same policies that got you to leave in the first place.
 
No; I'm reiterating to you what she testified to.

She performed NO forensic testing and was not qualified to address that point.
Go look that up, if you need a refresher.

You are continually befuddled by false right-wing talking points; perhaps change where you collect your news from.
If your absurd conjecture was close to being correct, the defense would have made numerous motions to have the laptop evidence excluded completely, as well as numerous objections to the laptop evidence presented at trial.

Keep doubling down. That's something you are the absolute master of. Maybe the best ever. Everyone knows it, and everyone is saying it. It's a tremendous, tremendous talent. Beautiful, really.
 
If your absurd conjecture was close to being correct, the defense would have made numerous motions to have the laptop evidence excluded completely, as well as numerous objections to the laptop evidence presented at trial.

Keep doubling down. That's something you are the absolute master of. Maybe the best ever. Everyone knows it, and everyone is saying it. It's a tremendous, tremendous talent. Beautiful, really.
You have to admire his persistence and consistency. When he's locked in on an issue. He will die on that hill everytime and accept no premise but his own, EVER.
 
you understand that bills can do multiple things, right?

legislation is not just one sentence scribbled on a napkin.

you are setting all these things up as choices, when we don't acutally have to choose between more judges or a tougher asylum process or more border fencing or more detention beds or more funding for border agents...we can have all of them

in fact, if someone is serious about addressing a complicated, decades-long problem like our southern border, they know it's multi-faceted approaches that address root causes (like ambiguity or loopholes in the asylum process or severe lack of ability to process claims) that are needed

or we can just pretend that the simplest solution will do it, while ignoring the fact that the problem would have been long solved were that true.
It’s amusing that people think the solution is as simple as waving a magic wand.

Some facts: we have laws on the books that require us to process immigrants who apply for asylum-specifically, there’s no cap on the number of people who can apply for asylum - just categories they can apply under. If you want to change that, you have to pass a law, can’t be done by executive order.

And for all the people who are applying, as mentioned there’s a massive backlog because there aren’t enough resources in place to process these applicants.

And then there’s all the other things that are part of the immigration issue.

Trump proved he’s not interested in a long-term solution; he just wants to campaign on it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT