15 posts, defending your position, not to take a position.Am I predicting a Hawk win Saturday. No. I am not making a prediction.
Going way out on a limb there.
15 posts, defending your position, not to take a position.Am I predicting a Hawk win Saturday. No. I am not making a prediction.
One 8-5 season???? You do realize in Kirk’s 19 full seasons at Iowa, he has finished 8-5 or worse 13 times? Which is the majority of the time. And he hasn’t exactly dominated ISU.
Look....I get it. Some of you can’t fathom the fact that ISU could possibly have a better offense...or that they could ever beat the Hawks. Personally, I can’t either. But things don’t always turn out like we want. I based my opinion (yeah.....OPINION....which is every bit as valid as YOURS) based on last year, what each team has this year, trends, and what I’ve seen so far. That can change after Saturday. We’ll find out. But if you are wrong, I doubt you will admit it. I’m sure you will have a good excuse.
We're a 3.5 point favorite and home field gets you 3.Huh? We're a FG favorite, at home. What about that spread tells you Vegas thinks Iowa is better. It would be a pick-em (at best) on a neutral field considering we are getting 3-5 points for Kinnick.
ISU should be favored. I don’t understand this line. I suspect it will move their way as the week goes on.
We're a 3.5 point favorite and home field gets you 3.
oops responded to the wrong post meant to respond to the 'will the cyclone trolls be here sunday'
I won’t! As you said, if I don’t make a prediction, I can’t.Given these two statements, I’ll call you out if you try the old “I told you so” routine, should Iowa lose. I’m just saying, if you’re not making a prediction, then you can’t come back later...
I can’t say I disagree with anything in your post. However, I wouldn’t say ISU has players returning from suspension, since they in fact did not actually serve their suspension.Any impressions by folks (Iowa and ISU fans alike) about whether ISU's lack of playing a game 1 will impact the game this Saturday?
It's true that Iowa will not have current film on the Cyclones. Of course, upon rewatching the NIU game - Iowa didn't exactly show ISU anything (at least, not anything that they didn't want ISU to see).
However, one of the old adages is that a team often demonstrates some of the greatest improvement from game 1 to game 2. Thus, Iowa could benefit from that ... whereas, for ISU, not so much!
Both teams get players back from suspension ... but which team will that benefit more? Again, I'd figure that game 1 allowed the Hawks to potentially bring along their OL and DL depth a little more. ISU simply didn't see enough reps against SDSU to benefit one way or the other.
Of course, the benefit of not playing is also that you're not placed in a position to get injured either. Against NIU, we saw IKM go down to an ankle injury ... how bad it is in anybody's guess. Other than that ... it appeared that the Hawks were thankfully able to remain pretty healthy. ISU, obviously, will be entering the Iowa game at optimal health.
What say you?
I won’t! As you said, if I don’t make a prediction, I can’t.
I gave up predicting this game long ago. Too many instances of Iowa losing while clearly having the better team. Line play on both sides will be key.
Can't we all just get along?
I see this coming as well. I hope Iowa anticipates and responds by mixing in some fire zones on 1st or 2nd down instead of waiting for Iowa State to have success in the short passing game first. Don't allow ISU to develop a rhythm.I expect ISU to implement a high-percentage passing game against us mixed in with a good running game ... and, not unlike the Hawks, they'll try to go for some chunk plays against us too. Given the experience of our safeties ... as I mentioned before, I'm hoping/anticipating that it will be harder for them to be successful with their "chunk" plays.
I’ll just chime in here for a moment.I think they are the better team. They have weapons on offense and can score a lot of points. Their offense is 2x better than Iowa’s.
While I believe Iowa’s defense is better, we really don’t know how good the secondary is....or if the LB’s can cover the pass. We’ll find out Saturday.
Plus....it won’t matter how good the defense is if they are on the field all game because the offense can’t put drives together.
Our biggest concern is our O-line run blocking..is it improved after being horrible last year. Montgomery was given few holes to work with last fall.As for my own predictions about the game ... my guess is that Iowa does a better job of taking away the big-play against ISU. Thus, I expect ISU has fewer long TD passes (compared to last year).
Frankly, my bigger fear is Montgomery running wild against the Hawks. Our run D didn't exactly inspire a ton of confidence based on what we saw against NIU.
I expect ISU to implement a high-percentage passing game against us mixed in with a good running game ... and, not unlike the Hawks, they'll try to go for some chunk plays against us too. Given the experience of our safeties ... as I mentioned before, I'm hoping/anticipating that it will be harder for them to be successful with their "chunk" plays.
Who wins? I don't know ... a lot will depend on the Hawks continuing to improve from game 1 to game 2.
My money says with our two starting tackles back, we will be able to run enough to keep ISU honest, and get some balls to the TE's. Hopefully BF can get Easley and ISM, and god help us SOMEONE on the otherside going. Don't see this being another 44-41 type game, but are offense didn't do crap week one last season either, and look what happened IN AMES. I'll take the Hawks 28-21 in Kinnick.Obviously just a number.....but are you saying our passing game is better than theirs? Our WR’s are better? They don’t have an exceptional RB? Their QB is significantly inferior?
As for CJ saying I “bailed” on the team....just because I don’t pick them to win every game doesn’t mean I bailed on them. I choose to view things in a more realistic light. My season prediction was 7-5. I stand by that unless and until the team proves otherwise. The offense in the first half was pathetic....you telling me it wasn’t? The passing game was atrocious. Care to prove to me otherwise?
I do think Iowa has the superior defense. Again....that won’t mean much if they have to be on the field all game because the offense can’t move the ball.
Saturday we will find out what this team is made of. Right now I believe ISU is better.
Well you'll find out Saturday won't you? I can tell you one thing, our two tackles will be itching for some game action.I’ll just chime in here for a moment.
Don’t sleep on ISU’s defense, either. I don’t think folks understand truly how good ISU’s defense has become..this may have been the bigger story for us last season. Our D-line may be the best ever at ISU. It took 3 or 4 games last season until DC Heacock got the defense dialed in.
I wouldn’t be surprised if ISU’s defense is the biggest storyline from this Saturday’s game in Iowa City.
Honest question: how good is Iowa’s O-line this year compared to previous Hawk o-lines?
Considering our entire team played a grand total of 4 minutes and 5 seconds the other day, they’ll be itching for some game action as well.Well you'll find out Saturday won't you? I can tell you one thing, our two tackles will be itching for some game action.
No, I don’t. I believe Iowa has the better lines. My only concern would be how well our tackles handle the blitz that ISU will be throwing almost every play. Hopefully Stanley can make them pay early. That will force ISU to play “honest”, which should really open up the running game and play action pass. I would love to see plenty of 3 TE sets.Finally, an intelligent post by you. You are correct that line play will be key. Do you really believe isu’s O-line will dominate Iowa’s d-line and their d-line is better than our o-line?
No, I don’t. I believe Iowa has the better lines. My only concern would be how well our tackles handle the blitz that ISU will be throwing almost every play. Hopefully Stanley can make them pay early. That will force ISU to play “honest”, which should really open up the running game and play action pass. I would love to see plenty of 3 TE sets.
Thanks for the post. Yeah, it's telling us that the betting line is predicting it to be pretty even. People are uncertain about who will win (or what side things will fall relative to the line). This is reflective of the fact that both teams appear to be pretty good (at least, on paper) ... and that the fact that it's a rivalry game means that both team ought to be pretty juiced.Research shows home field can be worth 3-7 points pending where it is; most on here would argue that Kinnick is worth more than the average CFB stadium, no? On top of that Iowa State hasn't even played a warm up game yet.
https://sites.google.com/site/sport...tistics/home-field-advantage-college-football
Here is a B10 report that shows Kinnick is worth 6.5 points.
There is nothing about being a 3.5 fav at Kinnick that says we're a better team.
Iowa ought to own the advantage in the match-up on both lines. The big question will relate to whether Iowa can limit big plays ... and whether the Hawkeye blockers can protect Stanley. If the Iowa D can limit big plays and if the Hawkeye blockers can protect Stanley (even with blitzers coming) ... then Iowa most likely wins.There is the answer. THIS is why ISU is 2x better than the Hawks!!
ISU's offense is 2X better? Really? And you evaluated this by ISU's no game this past weekend? Did you not see the tOSU game last year? NIU was supposed to have a good D, and Iowa ran down there throat the second half. It all depends on which Iowa offense shows up Saturday. Besides, you have to remember most of ISU's stats last season were against Big 12 defenses, which mean for the most part they were playing against no defense. Hawks show up saturday, Hawks win.I think they are the better team. They have weapons on offense and can score a lot of points. Their offense is 2x better than Iowa’s.
While I believe Iowa’s defense is better, we really don’t know how good the secondary is....or if the LB’s can cover the pass. We’ll find out Saturday.
Plus....it won’t matter how good the defense is if they are on the field all game because the offense can’t put drives together.
the d line is about the last thing anyone should be worried aboutWith all the talk of missing the starting OTs, I’m surprised that nothing’s been said of missing Lattimore, the starting DT. He’s the only other 300lb body (than M Nelson) in that DT rotation. That might make a difference in up the middle runs, about the only place the D was semi-questionable vs NI. If that gets firmed up, everything else on that D just gets more formidable.
i think it comes down to making good passes and CATCHING those passesThis game is going to come down to line play. Iowa state will come out early and get an early lead but Iowa will wear them down. Iowa will also struggle early due to the coaches insistence to playing three young linebackers instead of getting stone or Brent’s into a nickel package. Our ol an dL are better than anything they will see the rest of the year. Iowa state will need big plays and defensive breakdowns like last year to have a chance
ISU completed every pass and scored on every possession in its opener.ISU's offense is 2X better? Really? And you evaluated this by ISU's no game this past weekend? Did you not see the tOSU game last year? NIU was supposed to have a good D, and Iowa ran down there throat the second half. It all depends on which Iowa offense shows up Saturday. Besides, you have to remember most of ISU's stats last season were against Big 12 defenses, which mean for the most part they were playing against no defense. Hawks show up saturday, Hawks win.
fifyISU completed every pass and scored on every possession in its opener, a game that does not exist.
No offense to my fellow Iowa fans ... but we really don't have an idea of what our O is capable of yet. We got a sampling that our running game potentially has some teeth. A lot of folks questioned that because out of fear concerning perceived weaknesses on the OL (even along the interior of the OL).
Ghost.....I always enjoy your views and perspectives and most of the time are spot on. However, we put up 30 points in one half in the first game of the season. Without 2 starting OL tackles. I believe we do have some sort of an idea what we have offensively. Don't get me wrong this won't happen every game but our offense the 2nd half looked great. Plus, I might add that the 2 long runs in the first half were called back that could have made the game at halftime17-0. I'm hoping our O will finally help our D. Thoughts?
the d line is about the last thing anyone should be worried about
i think it comes down to making good passes and CATCHING those passes
if we can't move the ball by air, we might be screwed
if we can, should be an easy W
I certainly can't argue with that. LOLISU completed every pass and scored on every possession in its opener.
Finally, an intelligent post by you. You are correct that line play will be key. Do you really believe isu’s O-line will dominate Iowa’s d-line and their d-line is better than our o-line?
Bottom line is.....I hate ISU and I hate this game. I wish we would drop them from the schedule.
Vegas sets lines based on where they expect money to go. Hard to believe, I know.Vegas disagrees with your "expert" analysis. Hard to believe, I know.
Where would you like me to start? Their offense is 2x as good for starters. They have a raw offensive line with less talented personnel to work with; their weak armed quarterback offers no deep threat to our defensive backs and on defense they may be starting a true freshman at middle linebacker; and we enjoy a significant home field advantage to boot.What did I say that is wrong?Troll
bingo this game is terrible little bro wants out and hopes he never talks to big brother ever again. we need to renew series with debbie. ames vs lincoln two land grant universities and call it the midwest rustle. the medical tech law college is better served finding a more prestigious university to play in non con. we will take sisters of the poor or debbie or illinois. we dont care bout strength of schedule in ames. good luck iowa city tech and hope for NO injuries. keep it clean out there and god bless.
Very easy money