U sound like Debby fans with all this “what have we done in the past” be careful bro
Jirehl Brock names top 7
- Thread starter Blair Sanderson
- Start date
U sound like Debby fans with all this “what have we done in the past” be careful bro
How many BCS bowls has Your turd team even been too? Iowa has won a BCS Bowl and been there more than once . seriously do You have a 3rd nipple, hair growing from the middle of Your forehead , have an excessive drooling problem because that's the impression You are giving me .
I am not the one beating my chest about conference championships. Let's be clear, Iowa has no outright conf championships and had they played Ohio St in 2002, they wouldn't have any under KF. It seems to me that was the year that Wallace won in Iowa City.
Seneca Wallace won in Iowa City, and Ohio State won the National Championship. It is an excellent bet that Ohio State beats the Hawkeyes wherever the game is played.
No, no it’s not. Iowa was playing as well as anyone up to the bowl game. Osu is lucky they didn’t have to play Iowa that year as it earned them a mnc. You have no f****** clue who would have won that game.
This guy seriously was made to wear a helmet growing up , its like arguing with someone from the hills of West Virginia .
I came here to see discussion of Brock's preferences, and all I see is a bunch of people pissing on each other's faces.
Well actually you are wrong because because every school in the big 10 recognizes the championship. Arguement is so tired. Nice try in trying to change the arguement. Again I repeat Kirk Ferentz has accomplished more at Iowa in 19 years than Iowa state has in 100+ years including Matt saint Campbell who is 0-2 vs Iowa. It’s so laughable you take kirks 19 or Hayden’s 20 years and both better than isu’s History by far.
Numb nuts read the post I was responding to and context makes sense. Go back to your your own board to continue your Frost worshipping.
Just because the B1G was behind the time doesn’t mean we cannot tell it like it is, a shared title is just that, shared. Sure recognize it, but if you’re going to try and claim it’s as cool as a title won outright, give me a break. The last outright title Iowa won was in 1985.
But it’s ok that Nebraska recognizes shared titles? Because they do. Explain that one to us einstein? Or even more sad your new coach claims a national title from last year.
Last edited:
Rings hollow because Ohio State was clearly the better team. The unbalance schedule worked out extremely well for the Hawkeye that year.
Wrong. Iowa would have beaten osu that year. But, nonetheless, ferentz has not one, but 2 big ten crowns. How many does isu have? Lol.
Again ignore and change the topic. Big 10 and every school recognizes both teams as big 10 champs. Just like big 12 had TCU and Baylor few years ago. I know you guys are bitter since you haven’t sniffed one in over a 100 years but end of the day iowa gets the title. Sorry bud facts are facts.
Iowa couldn't beat ISU at Kinnick that year so they certainly weren't beating OSU
Not bitter at all....I recognize that Iowa was gifted a share of the title that year. Weak schedules can pay dividends as the hawks know on a regular basis.
Weak schedule? Iowa played every one but Osu and and a bad Illinois team that year. Again end of the day all the big 10 schools and national analyst & media recognize the big 10 title. Sorry too bad skippy. If you aren’t bitter why are you trying so hard to discredit Iowa fans of it? Speaking of weak schedules love how isu claims a big 12 division title when they went 4-4 and even lost to the other team they tied with. That doesn’t make your argument hypocritical at all. Yeah isu in big 12 north knows all about weak schedules....
But when you visit kinnick look to south end zone can see the 2002 champion banner that the big 10 OFFICIALLY acknowledges next fall.
Last edited:
I'm happy for you that you know the feelings of EVERYONE, on who is and who is not the champion. Just for the record, Iowa is acknowledged as being a conference champ in 2002, so I don't really care what you or anyone else thinks. Enlighten us with your vast knowledge though. If you lose your bowl game, are you no longer the conference champ?
Really? Did you have some $$$ on the Buckeyes last year as well? Still smarting over that one are you??????
Oh I remember that game as well. Iowa has a 21 point lead at the half, and KF makes probably the biggest mistake of his career by sticking with a banged up Brad Banks instead of just letting Chandler come in for mop up duty in the second half. Banks couldn't even hold on to the ball, and gave up three short field turnovers to ISU. If KF just runs the ball in the second half, Iowa ends the year at 12-0, ranked number one or two and is playing for the national title, instead of playing USC, who was the hottest team in football at the time. I guess with revisionist history you can come up with whatever scenario you want, can't you....
He is a chump...and will be gone from there within two seasons. Players win and he has a collection of left over southern talent.
You got it! The best part was Podolak claiming at halftime that he was heading down for the victory party! I am sure that he had another bender that night, but not as celebratory as he imagined!
Do you remember the OSU/Purdue game in 2002? It took a miracle for OSU to pull that game out. Purdue was worse than ISU that year. Iowa would have matched up fine with OSU in 2002 and it has nothing to do with ISU.
Just saying to claim Iowa wasn't or didn't deserve to be conf champ that year is ridiculous......
Isn't it good to have a team where you debate whether a conference title was outright or shared? Sure beats having to go on another teams site to provide your opinion because the team you support can't have that discussion for over a century.
I agree that Iowa probably beats OSU that year. That said, Iowa was also very fortunate to beat Purdue that year too. They were a testament to the importance of special teams. Boilers were very good both offensively and defensively, but absolute trash on special teams.
ISU started 6-1 With a loss to FSU in KC. We had the leading Heisman contender for the 1st half of the season. OSU won the National title that year. Teams rarely go through a complete season without close games that are won/lost on a couple of critical plays late in the game.
If OSU didn't go on to win a National Title that year, I would say you had a leg to stand on.
Haven't read anything beyond this point, but I'm sure you got crushed. You can't run around flippantly dismissing wrestling and then turn around and brag about Athletic Cup standings. Keep your ranking in that if it helps you sleep at night. Not a huge fan of Barta, but he brings in the $$$. We'll keep our hundreds of millions of dollars in upgrades, you can keep your top notch women's cross country (or whatever else you're good at), deal?
Since it's obvious you are just here to argue, I'll argue that USC at that point in the season was a better team them OSU or Miami....
Talkaboutwhogivesadangolephuckmang, 2002 who the phuck cares? That isn't what this thread is about.
TY and GFYs.
TY and GFYs.
Similar threads
