Your point is because we know the outcome, they don't count.
Which is wrong, otherwise you wouldn't object to really not counting them.
Kamala’s lead keeps dwindling. JFC this is pitiful.
- Thread starter artradley
- Start date
Your point is because we know the outcome, they don't count.
Which is wrong, otherwise you wouldn't object to really not counting them.
So, just because America’s high inflation was slightly less than other countries means it’s ok? Kind of like the old saying…just because everyone else jumps off a bridge…we should too? 😜
First, there wouldn’t have been a need for a “recovery” if high inflation hadn’t occurred under the Biden/Harris administration. Secondly, I (nor you) know what Trump’s policy plans will do to inflation? At least we know what his policy plans are (assuming they would get passed by Congress), unlike for Kamala. We do know that Trump’s 1st term in office didn’t generate high inflation.
How about shutting the immigration “spicket” off for a period of time until those that have already come in can be vetted, allowed to assimilate, etc. 🤔
Guess I'll post this here in the doom thread as well:
It's amazing how willingly you prove your ignorance. Congratulations on being so transparent.
Harris is routinely hitting 50% whereas Trump has a hard ceiling of 48%. That's bad news for Diaper Boy
Rs wore post it notes on their ears for TrumpWell the dems are a bunch of lemmings.
What does this have to do with the Electoral College today providing them "minority rule"?
No; it did not.
If it had, US inflation would have been higher than the rest of the Western world.
Only, US inflation has tracked lower than most.
And they still haven't "taken over" Aurora,CO.
New report warns bloodthirsty Venezuelan gang's footprint will remain in US ‘for decades'
Tren de Aragua, a violent Venezuelan gang that has sparked national headlines, will likely remain in the U.S. for decades, according to a new report being released this week.www.foxnews.com
Well the dems are a bunch of lemmings.
Maga would lick Trump's butthole clean after his many daily uncontrolled bowel movements.
What does this have to do with the entire GOP now claiming "they" helped pass the law?
I continue to think Kamala wins.
I continue to think that even if she doesn't, Trump 2.0 will be the end of things for him.
But, for those who like to get worked up about him trying to become king for life, I think I've found an existing constitutional pathway (textual at least - I didn't look whether the statutes seek to curtail it) for him to invoke, short of amendment, to make you sleep a little more restlessly at night, or at least to give you some armamentarium to invoke against people like me who don't believe it's remotely likely. Interestingly, the 22d amendment, which provides the 2-term limit, prohibits a person from being "elected" to the office of president if they have served two terms (or one term plus two years of the term of someone else elected). So, assuming no other valid ballot eligibility restrictions, he runs as vice president to some patsy, the patsy gets elected, then the patsy resigns, leading to his "succession" to the office of president, then he probably names the patsy to be the vice president. Voila! It's sort of like the Putin-Medvedev tandemocracy. And almost weird in how the amendment's sloppy drafting is similar to what created the result of the election of 1796. Honestly, it's a wonder that Biden-Obama didn't think of this.
I continue to think that even if she doesn't, Trump 2.0 will be the end of things for him.
But, for those who like to get worked up about him trying to become king for life, I think I've found an existing constitutional pathway (textual at least - I didn't look whether the statutes seek to curtail it) for him to invoke, short of amendment, to make you sleep a little more restlessly at night, or at least to give you some armamentarium to invoke against people like me who don't believe it's remotely likely. Interestingly, the 22d amendment, which provides the 2-term limit, prohibits a person from being "elected" to the office of president if they have served two terms (or one term plus two years of the term of someone else elected). So, assuming no other valid ballot eligibility restrictions, he runs as vice president to some patsy, the patsy gets elected, then the patsy resigns, leading to his "succession" to the office of president, then he probably names the patsy to be the vice president. Voila! It's sort of like the Putin-Medvedev tandemocracy. And almost weird in how the amendment's sloppy drafting is similar to what created the result of the election of 1796. Honestly, it's a wonder that Biden-Obama didn't think of this.
Last edited:
You think Michael Flynn is going to rein Trump in?
Michael Flynn?!!! Sheesh Joe, you're digging perty deep into the old cast of characters there. For a whole bunch of reasons, including that even if he does get elected, we will once again not reelect him due to sheer exhaustion from him. As to "military coup" scenarios, you're probably well past sleeping restlessly at night already.
The EC doesn't provide minority rule. States elect the POTUS, not the popular vote. We live in the United States of America. You might want to take a refresher civics course.
Amazed that Scruffy hasn't swooped in yet to provide his oh so reliable and honest polling data to show you how wrong you are.
Guy has about 20 days left before he'll have to create a new username.
He's kicking his rhetoric into overdrive lately.
He's going to be insufferable these next few weeks, half tempted to take him off ignore just to hear his nuggets of wisdom. 😅
He's posting as @Here_4_a_Day when he isn't @RicoSuave102954Amazed that Scruffy hasn't swooped in yet to provide his oh so reliable and honest polling data to show you how wrong you are.
Guy has about 20 days left before he'll have to create a new username.
He's kicking his rhetoric into overdrive lately.
He's going to be insufferable these next few weeks, half tempted to take him off ignore just to hear his nuggets of wisdom. 😅
It was, for the same damn reason - they printed their currency to hand out. The policy caused the problem everywhere it was employed.
If the BoE and Fed both print money, both currencies will be inflated by the policy and prices will rise, but the Fed isn't responsible for the inflation experienced by the Pound.
We're the only nation on the planet that can export their inflation, because our currency is used for international trade, so we experience less inflation with this policy than a nation that didn't have the rest of the world using its currency would endure.
The root cause remains the same.
If all those usernames are handled by one person either they better be getting paid handsomely for their propaganda, or I never want to run into this person in real life because they're clinically insane. 😆
The latter is a given. They might be paid in day old food or beet root, whichever their Russian handlers prefer.If all those usernames are handled by one person either they better be getting paid handsomely for their propaganda, or I never want to run into this person in real life because they're clinically insane. 😆
It most certainly does and has for the past couple decades.
Yes.
All of the deficit spending contributes to our inflation under our fiat monetary system.
It's the policy, not the personalities.
