Not a fan of the choice. Harris had Minnesota wrapped up and I don't find Tim Walz to be all that compelling.
Should have gone with Kelly or Shaprio IMO.
Should have gone with Kelly or Shaprio IMO.
I liked them all. I'm fine with the choice.Not a fan of the choice. Harris had Minnesota wrapped up and I don't find Tim Walz to be all that compelling.
Should have gone with Kelly or Shaprio IMO.
I am very happy it's Walz. Walz is incredibly likable and has a way of boiling things down in a very relatable way. Harris did very well hereNot a fan of the choice. Harris had Minnesota wrapped up and I don't find Tim Walz to be all that compelling.
Should have gone with Kelly or Shaprio IMO.
Hmmm...IMO she didn’t help herself with this pick.It's official it's Walz.
Walz didn’t shoot enough protestors for your tastes? Harris was in the Senate at the time, by the way.Walz is a bad pick IMO. Needed a more moderate candidate to balance out the ticket, and Republicans are going to crush Harris and Walz for their response to the George Floyd riots.
When he stands next to J.D. Vance does he seem more likely to be able to be president? That is the question that matters, and Vance is just plain weird.Hmmm...IMO she didn’t help herself with this pick.
You wouldn’t have been “impressed” by anyoneThey must have actually been nervous about losing Minnesota given this pick.
I'm not impressed. Walz, like Kamala, is very very far left. He encouraged the BLM riots (that Kamala then fundraised for the same violent criminals to be bailed out of jail) and is woke on pretty much every issue down to putting tampons in the boys bathrooms in government schools.
Furthest left ticket in US history far and away.
This is 100% why he was chosen. He’s definitely going to play up the folksy Midwestern dad persona.Read the guy’s bio on Wikipedia. He’s an outstanding pick. Someone that can be an effective messenger and maybe gain back some rural areas because he knows how to talk to them.
Read the guy’s bio on Wikipedia. He’s an outstanding pick. Someone that can be an effective messenger and maybe gain back some rural areas because he knows how to talk to them.
If you're rooting for Trump, Walz is a great choice.
Based on his electoral history that seems to not be the case.
![]()
2010 MN Gov (Mark Dayton)
![]()
2014 MN Gov (Mark Dayton)
![]()
2018 (Tim Waltz)
![]()
2022 (Tim Waltz)
He's losing more and more rural areas in MN, not gaining them.
He's more likeable than she is. She needs someone who inspires confidence, but isn't more likeable than her.
Nah Shapiro was the much easier target for Trump.
Walz energizes the base more and has less baggage policy wise.
Shapiro would have been a far better pick despite him settling sexual harassment claims with tax payer money. Walz is one of the worst governors in the country lolYou wouldn’t have been “impressed” by anyone
Derp.Walz didn’t shoot enough protestors for your tastes? Harris was in the Senate at the time, by the way.
If she would have picked Jeffrey Dahmer you would've said you liked the pick and Harris did very well.😄😆I am very happy it's Walz. Walz is incredibly likable and has a way of boiling things down in a very relatable way. Harris did very well here
That’s true nationwide. I didn’t say win rural areas outright. The key for Dems is to not get destroyed in rural areas and only lose like 60-40 instead of 80-20.Based on his electoral history that seems to not be the case.
![]()
2010 MN Gov (Mark Dayton)
![]()
2014 MN Gov (Mark Dayton)
![]()
2018 (Tim Waltz)
![]()
2022 (Tim Waltz)
He's losing more and more rural areas in MN, not gaining them.
Walz has been working at making a blue state red.
Individually, Walz is a good pick. He's a moderate with a good background.
In this election though, I don't know what he brings aside from being a better speaker than Harris. Minnesota hasn't gone Repub since Nixon in 1972. And only 3 times in the past 90 years. It was the only state that didn't vote for Reagan in 1984. Hillary was kind of close to losing the state, but worrying about Minnesota isn't nearly as important as trying to win other truly purple states like PA or GA.
I’m guessing that last paragraph has more to do with the candidates Republicans are running these days than anything else.That isn't the case either. In terms of percentages he blew away the competition in 2 straight elections. He won by 11 in 2018 and 8 points in 2022 which is far better than the previous 2 term Dem governor who won by 6 in 2014 and less than a half a percent in 2010.
However Walz is just running up the votes in the urban areas more than previous governors. Look at the urban counties they get a darker blue with Walz.
I am very happy it's Walz. Walz is incredibly likable and has a way of boiling things down in a very relatable way. Harris did very well here
I think that is the big story here. Shapiro was the safe moderate pick and Walz is about as left as it gets on most policy issues. Appease the radicals in the party I guess.I guess the "genocide Josh" folks hold a lot of sway.
DUI in 95? He's definitely got at least one posters support on here with that fact alone
That’s true nationwide. I didn’t say win rural areas outright. The key for Dems is to not get destroyed in rural areas and only lose like 60-40 instead of 80-20.