Seriously? So you only see what you want when you watch the protests? I'm fine with the peaceful protests, but if you really think thats all the BLM is good with then your either blind or naive. In many cities American cities many of these protests turned at night into violence against police, looting, burning of homes and businesses, and many of those business owners were people of color and other innocent folks who had nothing to do with why they were protesting. I would call them uninvolved third parties. Not only has the BLM with their huge national stage right now, done ABSOLUTELY nothing to state opposition to these terrible acts being brought on innocents, they are all about creating further chaos amongst the masses. The BLM is fine with getting closer to their goals regardless of who gets trampled in the process.I don't think you can agree to disagree about fundamental human rights. I think of BLM as addressing police interactions even though I understand there are other issues they address. I watch the protests and see anger and frustration and agree that the protesters are justified to feel that way. I think anyone causing damage should be charged and prosecuted even if I understand their anger. I think the officers that murdered Breonna Taylor should be charged. I believe the manner in which Trump is using federal officers against protesters should concern every American that believes in the Constitution. I believe BLM's decision to address some issues and not others is entirely up to them and all the what about X, Y, Z is just an attempt to undermine and diminish their message. I find the lengths to which some people will go to deny racial disparities to be disgusting and inexcusable.
I'm not sure what you mean by violence against uninvolved third parties so I can't answer that question without more information from you.
Frankly, I find the lengths that some people are willing to go to defend this type of anarchy both disgusting and inexcusable.....