Kirk was on 670 The Score here in Chicago today
- Thread starter LaQuintaHawkeye
- Start date
It starts to mess with average number of games played. It's easier just to say he is a 7-5 regular season coach. I dont give these numbers to hate on KF the data is the data. Roger just has a hard on for saying he isnt a 7-5 coach.
Actually it seems like you have a point to push and would rather use data that supports your position.
Then why wouldnt I include the bowls?
He is 7-8 in the bowls of I really wanted to slam on that I would use the numbers.
The numbers are a little skewed with the first two garbage seasons where everyone will admit the talent was rather lacking.
Since then Ferentz is 139-78 .6405 winning percentage. Averages out to 8.17 and 4.588
So if you want to bash Ferentz go ahead and include those first two seasons where he pretty much had no control on who was on that existing roster.
Lets be honest, Hayden definitely stayed a couple of years too long.
The numbers are still the numbers. You cannot remove data and claim the numbers are valid. They paint the entire picture.
Because you want to claim we only play 12 games a year......so your 7-5 makes sense.
If he was good enough in bowls that the win percentage was .615 overall I would gladly include them but in order to do that the hawks would have alot more bowl wins which would increase the reputation of the program which is exactly what we are talking about. He doesnt have the wins. Adding the bowls only hurts him.
Alright, let’s keep it up. He has averaged 8 wins over the past 19 seasons. He has averaged 5 losses over that same time. Please do not do the math WDDT. You struggle mightily. 8-5 looks good to me.
You are missing my point. I am starting at a point in time where his roster had many of his players and his system in place. Since you have this odd hard on for Ferentz, lets actually bash him on things he had control of.
Stick to posting retweets, you're less of an ass that way.
If you include the bowls his overall record is 150 and 105. Or .588. Assuming in a bowl year there are now 13 games. .588 of 13 is 7.65.
7.65 does not mean he averages 8 wins. It means he averages 7 wins and is more likely to win 8 than he is 6 but his number is still 7 until it is 8.
7.65 does not mean he averages 8 wins. It means he averages 7 wins and is more likely to win 8 than he is 6 but his number is still 7 until it is 8.
That's closer to eight than 7. In what world is that not closer to 8 than 7?
A
anon_8rcdnbko1jbe0
Guest
Hey I just popped in to see what was going on and could care less about the argument. But the line "doesn't round to piss" cracks me up! That's all I got - enjoy your Tuesday fellas!
Yes it s closer but close here shows you that if he doesnt win 7 he is much more likely to win 8 than 6 but his average is still 7.
He is closer to 8 than 6 with those numbers but his number is still 7 so he is "closer" to 7.
Sorry for being such a dunce. I am out too. Please leave all your posts up?
If his win total was closer to 8 than it is 7 he would have an above .615 (13 game) win percentage. You dont get to round in statistics.
Quit picking one part and making it all about that. All the resources rolled up is the point. Contract length is a big advantage as he can tell recruits he’ll be here forever and show a strong financial commitment to coach and staff
He annually schedules four wins in non con and then hides in the lowly b10 west
Number of times we have played 13 regular season games in the last 19 years =1. Giving him a 8-5 average is blatantly false.
as is saying iowa played 13 regular season games. The B1G Championship isn’t a regular season game. Only teams that travel to Hawaii and Hawaii are allowed to play 13 regular season games.
Keep it up. For those who can add, subtract, multiply and divide it’s 8-5. For those who cannot add 3, single digit numbers, 7-5 will work. Please stick to retweeting.
Ok your turn. Show me how you get to 8 wins without rounding.
As I said earlier half a win doesnt mean piss. You have 7 until you have 8.
As I said earlier half a win doesnt mean piss. You have 7 until you have 8.
You are funny. I am not going to try and explain it again. I am talking to less than a brick wall. But keep trying!
The next time you try to explain it will be your first, You can't do it. Your ability to avoid a direct question is worse than cytwins. Hey bud, you keep telling people KF is a 8-5 coach. .596 really makes ya happy. Those of us smart enough to realize we only play 13 games in bowl years and even then he averages 7 wins will know your not very smart.
A
anon_8rcdnbko1jbe0
Guest
I know you're on a roll but you made the classic mistake when you're trying to question a posters smarts. You're able to edit that if you're so inclined.
Last time Einstein. He has won 143 games in 19 years. Do the math. He has averaged 7.53 wins a year. That rounds to 8 per year no matter what math test you are taking. We have some real dandies on this forum and you take the cake. Hate Ferentz all you want, but go buy a calculator and have your daughter show you how to calculate an average.
Rounds.... you cannot do it without the word "rounds". You are skewing the data. Try again.
Edit: rounds "goes up to" "gets moved to" all the same.
If a coach averages 7.5 wins and 5 losses for every 12 games he coaches. After 12 games, how many has he actually won?
Edit: rounds "goes up to" "gets moved to" all the same.
If a coach averages 7.5 wins and 5 losses for every 12 games he coaches. After 12 games, how many has he actually won?
Last edited:
Just drop it please? You win. I do not want to explain it further. Please?
Similar threads
