8 one year and 7 the other. Or 9 and 6, 10 and 5 etc. But obviously you both know one of you is talking about 12 games with no rounding and the other is talking about averages over his career where they’ve played anywhere from 11-14 games in a year. Neither of you will win an argument until you agree on which set of data you are using.
Sorry. I think you are an effin douche bag. But I am sure you’ve been called worse. Ferentz has averaged 13 games a year and with an average record of 8-5.
Not a good question. Different sport. Baseball has always rounded to thousandths. Do you understand the difference between whole numbers and decimals?
Right on dbag. Let’s say Ferentz coaches for 23 years and he averages just under 13 games a year. Still with me dbag? We calculate the average wins and losses per year. He has 7.98 wins over year and 4.95 losses per year. You are telling me that you would say that his average yearly record is 7-4? Think before you open your mouth. If you say 7-4 accurately depicts his average yearly record, then I truly feel sorry for you.
This whole thing got started with me defending Ferentz and the program when the haters keep putting 7-5 next to his name and next to Iowa. I think that it is just as easy or even more accurate to use 8-5 as the yearly average numbers. Problem is, I am talking to a couple 5 year olds who do not understand how numbers work. Sorry douche bag. I really am!
Answer the question. Does 7.98 round up to 8? But 7.53 doesn’t? Come on dbag! You can do it!
Holy shit. You are still in 4th grade. What I used was a hypothetical situation to make a point. Can you answer the question now dbag? Take your time.
If you you can show me how 7.53 is closer to 7 than it is to 8, then you are right.
Very serious Eddy! You’ll understand someday! Btw I’m not even forty yet, and still in very good shape! I can’t keep track though, you do like Ferentz? You seem to be contradicting yourself!
Then 7-5 should not be used either when talking about Iowa’s average record under Ferentz. I am not opening any of your links. I used to work as a data analyst and I know how rounding numbers can skew data. We honestly learn that in middle school.
In my last position we had to be accurate to 6 decimal places. Our system rounded to 6 places. Data analysts round numbers all day long. What about an irrational number that keeps going? You cannot be serious about this?
My god you are clueless. Stick to stalking teenagers over on twitter.
I worked a recent 6 year stint with Reuters as a Senior Data Analyst. Be careful who you call a liar little man.
