ADVERTISEMENT

Lib Host Jon Stewart Overvalued His Home By 829% After Saying Trump Civil Case Is 'Not Victimless'

RicoSuave102954

HR All-American
Jul 17, 2023
3,255
2,542
113
Montezuma, Iowa
Virulently anti-Trump comedian and TV host Jon Stewart is facing a backlash after being accused of perpetrating the same behavior that he has criticized former President Donald Trump of committing.

Stewart is facing criticism after attacking Trump over claims that he overvalued some of his properties, a claim lodged against him during the former president’s New York civil case.

The former president has blasted the $454 million appeal bond and his legal team has questioned the ruling and said it is untoward for a "victimless crime."

But Stewart has scoffed at that defense.

Stewart's "The Daily Show" had run a clip of "Shark Tank" star Kevin O’Leary attacking the ruling on CNN and saying that the whole court case is a danger for the entire real estate industry, the New York Post reported.

In the clip, CNN’s Laura Coates replied to O'Leary by pointing out that Trump was accused of falsifying business records in the second degree, along with insurance fraud and making false financial statements, all in connection with an attempt to inflate his assets.

But O'Leary explained that "[e]verything that you just listed off is done by every real estate developer everywhere on Earth in every city. This has never been prosecuted."

After the clip ended, Stweart jumped in to quip, "How is he not this mad about overvaluations in the real world?

"Because they are not victimless crimes," Stewart added.

Stewart continued his attack, saying that, "money isn’t infinite. A loan that goes to the liar doesn’t go to someone who’s giving a more honest evaluation. So the system becomes incentivized for corruption."

He went on to claim that if someone pays lower taxes based on lower property values, then that is fraud.

"The attorney general of New York knew that Trump’s property values were inflated because when it came time to pay taxes, Trump undervalued the very same properties," Stewart exclaimed. "It was all part of a very specific real estate practice known as lying."

Stewart's righteous indignation, though, soon came under fire when social media users began to notice a small flaw in Stewart's pious stance against Trump and his "fraud."

The Post reported that Stewart's 2014 sale of his Tribeca duplex was not all as above-board as the TV host may have contended.

Stewart sold his 6,280-square-foot apartment to financier Parag Pande for $17.5 million. But at the time, the asking price of the property was not made public.

However, according to 2013-2014 assessor's report, the property was only assessed at a market value of only $1.882 million. And the assessor's value came in even lower at $847,174.

The overvaluation added up to a whopping 829 percent, according to the Post.

With all that, it was noted that Stewart paid far less in taxes on a property assessed at a mere $847,174, than he would on a property "worth" $17.5 million.

But even more to the point, Pande resold the property for only around $13 million in 2021, a 26 percent loss.

Stewart's financial windfall caused many to wonder if the TV star committed the same "fraud" that he claimed that Trump committed.


Did @jonstewart commit fraud when he sold his penthouse for $17.5M?

NY listed its market value at $1.8M an AV at around 800k

Who did he He defraud??

I am SHOCKED

SHOCKED pic.twitter.com/9okis96VQP

— Tim Pool (@Timcast) March 26, 2024

The Post added that the tax bill for Stewart's penthouse was assessed in the same way that Trump's was, the same formula that New York Attorney General Letitia James used to claim Trump committed fraud.

"Stewart’s reps did not respond to The Post’s request for comment," the outlet reported.

 
Virulently anti-Trump comedian and TV host Jon Stewart is facing a backlash after being accused of perpetrating the same behavior that he has criticized former President Donald Trump of committing.

Stewart is facing criticism after attacking Trump over claims that he overvalued some of his properties, a claim lodged against him during the former president’s New York civil case.

The former president has blasted the $454 million appeal bond and his legal team has questioned the ruling and said it is untoward for a "victimless crime."

But Stewart has scoffed at that defense.

Stewart's "The Daily Show" had run a clip of "Shark Tank" star Kevin O’Leary attacking the ruling on CNN and saying that the whole court case is a danger for the entire real estate industry, the New York Post reported.

In the clip, CNN’s Laura Coates replied to O'Leary by pointing out that Trump was accused of falsifying business records in the second degree, along with insurance fraud and making false financial statements, all in connection with an attempt to inflate his assets.

But O'Leary explained that "[e]verything that you just listed off is done by every real estate developer everywhere on Earth in every city. This has never been prosecuted."

After the clip ended, Stweart jumped in to quip, "How is he not this mad about overvaluations in the real world?

"Because they are not victimless crimes," Stewart added.

Stewart continued his attack, saying that, "money isn’t infinite. A loan that goes to the liar doesn’t go to someone who’s giving a more honest evaluation. So the system becomes incentivized for corruption."

He went on to claim that if someone pays lower taxes based on lower property values, then that is fraud.

"The attorney general of New York knew that Trump’s property values were inflated because when it came time to pay taxes, Trump undervalued the very same properties," Stewart exclaimed. "It was all part of a very specific real estate practice known as lying."

Stewart's righteous indignation, though, soon came under fire when social media users began to notice a small flaw in Stewart's pious stance against Trump and his "fraud."

The Post reported that Stewart's 2014 sale of his Tribeca duplex was not all as above-board as the TV host may have contended.

Stewart sold his 6,280-square-foot apartment to financier Parag Pande for $17.5 million. But at the time, the asking price of the property was not made public.

However, according to 2013-2014 assessor's report, the property was only assessed at a market value of only $1.882 million. And the assessor's value came in even lower at $847,174.

The overvaluation added up to a whopping 829 percent, according to the Post.

With all that, it was noted that Stewart paid far less in taxes on a property assessed at a mere $847,174, than he would on a property "worth" $17.5 million.

But even more to the point, Pande resold the property for only around $13 million in 2021, a 26 percent loss.

Stewart's financial windfall caused many to wonder if the TV star committed the same "fraud" that he claimed that Trump committed.


Did @jonstewart commit fraud when he sold his penthouse for $17.5M?

NY listed its market value at $1.8M an AV at around 800k

Who did he He defraud??

I am SHOCKED

SHOCKED pic.twitter.com/9okis96VQP

— Tim Pool (@Timcast) March 26, 2024

The Post added that the tax bill for Stewart's penthouse was assessed in the same way that Trump's was, the same formula that New York Attorney General Letitia James used to claim Trump committed fraud.

"Stewart’s reps did not respond to The Post’s request for comment," the outlet reported.

The Western Journal 🤣. Throw in Tim Pool 🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and ericram
Stewart isn't smart enough to figure out that when you fu-- with DJT you better be snow white yourself.

I can't wait until the national news picks up on this one.

Watch the swarmy rat Steward squirm.
Wow! Stewart performed his own property tax assessment and then inflated it to get more favorable terms on a loan???

No. And No.

Try again Uncle Rico.
 
Virulently anti-Trump comedian and TV host Jon Stewart is facing a backlash after being accused of perpetrating the same behavior that he has criticized former President Donald Trump of committing.

Stewart is facing criticism after attacking Trump over claims that he overvalued some of his properties, a claim lodged against him during the former president’s New York civil case.

The former president has blasted the $454 million appeal bond and his legal team has questioned the ruling and said it is untoward for a "victimless crime."

But Stewart has scoffed at that defense.

Stewart's "The Daily Show" had run a clip of "Shark Tank" star Kevin O’Leary attacking the ruling on CNN and saying that the whole court case is a danger for the entire real estate industry, the New York Post reported.

In the clip, CNN’s Laura Coates replied to O'Leary by pointing out that Trump was accused of falsifying business records in the second degree, along with insurance fraud and making false financial statements, all in connection with an attempt to inflate his assets.

But O'Leary explained that "[e]verything that you just listed off is done by every real estate developer everywhere on Earth in every city. This has never been prosecuted."

After the clip ended, Stweart jumped in to quip, "How is he not this mad about overvaluations in the real world?

"Because they are not victimless crimes," Stewart added.

Stewart continued his attack, saying that, "money isn’t infinite. A loan that goes to the liar doesn’t go to someone who’s giving a more honest evaluation. So the system becomes incentivized for corruption."

He went on to claim that if someone pays lower taxes based on lower property values, then that is fraud.

"The attorney general of New York knew that Trump’s property values were inflated because when it came time to pay taxes, Trump undervalued the very same properties," Stewart exclaimed. "It was all part of a very specific real estate practice known as lying."

Stewart's righteous indignation, though, soon came under fire when social media users began to notice a small flaw in Stewart's pious stance against Trump and his "fraud."

The Post reported that Stewart's 2014 sale of his Tribeca duplex was not all as above-board as the TV host may have contended.

Stewart sold his 6,280-square-foot apartment to financier Parag Pande for $17.5 million. But at the time, the asking price of the property was not made public.

However, according to 2013-2014 assessor's report, the property was only assessed at a market value of only $1.882 million. And the assessor's value came in even lower at $847,174.

The overvaluation added up to a whopping 829 percent, according to the Post.

With all that, it was noted that Stewart paid far less in taxes on a property assessed at a mere $847,174, than he would on a property "worth" $17.5 million.

But even more to the point, Pande resold the property for only around $13 million in 2021, a 26 percent loss.

Stewart's financial windfall caused many to wonder if the TV star committed the same "fraud" that he claimed that Trump committed.


Did @jonstewart commit fraud when he sold his penthouse for $17.5M?

NY listed its market value at $1.8M an AV at around 800k

Who did he He defraud??

I am SHOCKED

SHOCKED pic.twitter.com/9okis96VQP

— Tim Pool (@Timcast) March 26, 2024

The Post added that the tax bill for Stewart's penthouse was assessed in the same way that Trump's was, the same formula that New York Attorney General Letitia James used to claim Trump committed fraud.

"Stewart’s reps did not respond to The Post’s request for comment," the outlet reported.

“Money isn’t infinite…”

Has anyone informed the Fed of this earth shattering revelation?
 
Increases in assessments on primary residences are capped in New York. His assessed value was in accordance with the law.

If you’d like to change the system, Saul Levmore has some really interesting ideas about better ways to get taxable values.

I am sure there is way more too this than the article would make me believe, but based off n that article, John Stewart is 100% hypocritical here.

He went on to claim that if someone pays lower taxes based on lower property values, then that is fraud.

Every Day Immune Support - New & Improved Immune+ Formula
Ad
www.emergenc.com/Enhanced_Immune/Support
th



"The attorney general of New York knew that Trump’s property values were inflated because when it came time to pay taxes, Trump undervalued the very same properties," Stewart exclaimed. "It was all part of a very specific real estate practice known as lying."
 
Yes but doesn’t “the bank” have an (ethical) obligation to protect its depositors money ?
That's between the bank and the fdic. If Joel tried to secure a heloc your home would be reappraised.

Borrowers over value their home to get more money out everyday. The responsibility is on the bank to get the correct numbers.
 
I am so confused:

1). Assessed value does not tell a seller what price to sell a property at
2) A seller can set the sale price at whatever they want to. If someone overpays, good for the seller.

WTF is Stewart accused of doing wrong here?
 
In not going to defend Jon Stewart, but ...

The government decides how to assess real estate. That's really the end of the story.

There is no evidence of hypocrisy or lying in that article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawk771 and Ree4
I am so confused:

1). Assessed value does not tell a seller what price to sell a property at
2) A seller can set the sale price at whatever they want to. If someone overpays, good for the seller.

WTF is Stewart accused of doing wrong here?

Absolutely nothing,.. same as Trump, absolutely nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
That's between the bank and the fdic. If Joel tried to secure a heloc your home would be reappraised.

Borrowers over value their home to get more money out everyday. The responsibility is on the bank to get the correct numbers.
And their failure to do so was certainly a major reason why home mortgage industry tanked back in 2007-8…OVERSIGHT and REGULATION of the banking industry is a necessary evil because, as we all know (but not admit)many folks will cheat and steal when money is involved…..and this certainly includes those in the financial and real estate industries.
 
I am so confused:

1). Assessed value does not tell a seller what price to sell a property at
2) A seller can set the sale price at whatever they want to. If someone overpays, good for the seller.

WTF is Stewart accused of doing wrong here?
You are starting to pick your way through the bullshit.

A seller can always say the value if their home is one thing, they are not a licensed appraiser, and even if they are, they can't appraise their own home. The bank sends a representative to make that determination and thus the bank sets the agreed upon terms of the loan. Now add in the fact the loan originally in question was paid back and you start to realize this case wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else. I had borrowers over value thier some hundreds of times during my mortgage days.


Take off the "Donald is the devil" glasses foe 2 seconds and you can easily see this wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else and if anything it's the bank that needs to be corrected on the pending practices.
 
And their failure to do so was certainly a major reason why home mortgage industry tanked back in 2007-8…OVERSIGHT and REGULATION of the banking industry is a necessary evil because, as we all know (but not admit)many folks will cheat and steal when money is involved…..and this certainly includes those in the financial and real estate industries.
Sounds like the FDIC has an issue with the banks again, the borrower is not an appraiser, they put down what they feel the home is worth or hope to get out of the property. The responsibility is on the bank.
 
That doesn’t make it right or even legal.
There are checks and balances. Joe schmo is a terrible estimator of current market conditions and always thinks that 2k deck they built added 2k value to their home( ect) the bank is the authority on the value of the item they want to lend against.
 
You are starting to pick your way through the bullshit.

A seller can always say the value if their home is one thing, they are not a licensed appraiser, and even if they are, they can't appraise their own home. The bank sends a representative to make that determination and thus the bank sets the agreed upon terms of the loan. Now add in the fact the loan originally in question was paid back and you start to realize this case wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else. I had borrowers over value thier some hundreds of times during my mortgage days.


Take off the "Donald is the devil" glasses foe 2 seconds and you can easily see this wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else and if anything it's the bank that needs to be corrected on the pending practices.
However…..it has been shown that Trump actively participated in intentionally misrepresenting his property he wanted the bank to mortgage. And that woul;d be the sin here.
 
However…..it has been shown that Trump actively participated in intentionally misrepresenting his property he wanted the bank to mortgage. And that woul;d be the sin here.
Apparently you know more than I do about how he represented it, of course it's still the banks job to do due diligence, example someone claiming a bedroom that isn't actually a bedroom foe us common folk.


What did he misrepresent?
 
Apparently you know more than I do about how he represented it, of course it's still the banks job to do due diligence, example someone claiming a bedroom that isn't actually a bedroom foe us common folk.


What did he misrepresent?
That was the whole purpose of the trial, whiskey. The State of New York maintained that Trump was actively involved in misrepresenting the values of his properties to the bank to negotiate a lower interest rate….and THAT is fraud which is against the law. It was not a “his wors against his word” situation. It was fraud.
 
That was the whole purpose of the trial, whiskey. The State of New York maintained that Trump was actively involved in misrepresenting the values of his properties to the bank to negotiate a lower interest rate….and THAT is fraud which is against the law. It was not a “his wors against his word” situation. It was fraud.
Again, it's on the bank to do due diligence.


People claim extra beds, extra space, upgrades, all the time, the borrower is never pursued, the onus is on the bank, I'd the bank said it was worth 400b, the borrower can borrow against that, and again, the loan was paid back.


This wouldn't have happened to a normal borrower. This was 100% politically motivated.
 
Again, it's on the bank to do due diligence.


People claim extra beds, extra space, upgrades, all the time, the borrower is never pursued, the onus is on the bank, I'd the bank said it was worth 400b, the borrower can borrow against that, and again, the loan was paid back.


This wouldn't have happened to a normal borrower. This was 100% politically motivated.
Yes, to a point…..but the applicant is REQUIRED to be honest in his/her information that serves as the basis for the bank’s decision. Come on, whiskey……shit we all have been thru this crap before……TRUMP lied internationally…at least is was shown in Court he did.
Banks are crooked as hell……one reason I’m a Jacksonian Democrat…..but I have been smart enough to understand this most of my adult life. When money is involved, all bets are off…..people cheat, steal and kill when money is involved. Anyone not understanding this is a fool. Money can never be order-regulated because of this fact. Christ even talks about this often.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
You are starting to pick your way through the bullshit.

A seller can always say the value if their home is one thing, they are not a licensed appraiser, and even if they are, they can't appraise their own home. The bank sends a representative to make that determination and thus the bank sets the agreed upon terms of the loan. Now add in the fact the loan originally in question was paid back and you start to realize this case wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else. I had borrowers over value thier some hundreds of times during my mortgage days.


Take off the "Donald is the devil" glasses foe 2 seconds and you can easily see this wouldn't have been pursued against anyone else and if anything it's the bank that needs to be corrected on the pending practices.
Well, but there is a difference between a seller setting a way too high price and hoping someone will pay it, and a person claiming a value of a property that they know beyond a reasonable doubt is unrealistic to use to help get a loan.

The first is “buyer beware”. The second is an act of dishonesty. The seller is not stating the value of the property, just what they will sell it for.
 
There are checks and balances. Joe schmo is a terrible estimator of current market conditions and always thinks that 2k deck they built added 2k value to their home( ect) the bank is the authority on the value of the item they want to lend against.
Then why have Joe even put a value?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT