It's a Friday night and Iowa isn't playing, says more about you than this board.In 37 minutes, 3 people have clicked on the thread titled, "line play".
Says it all about this board.
No interest in what actually matters
Nope. Many other threads got views during that time periodIt's a Friday night and Iowa isn't playing, says more about you than this board.
I’ve said our line sucks, bailed out by KJ2Nope. Many other threads got views during that time period
Lost that when they fired the best strength coach around.I would love to have a physical line like Notre Dame
Lol.I’ve said our line sucks, bailed out by KJ2
Split time/hurt last year, freshman rushing record in 22. Lol at you.Lol.
So why couldn't he get any yards the previous two seasons?
He beat Illinois, he was hurt a few games too, and of course… BFLol.
So why couldn't he get any yards the previous two seasons?
He’s a dumasSplit time/hurt last year, freshman rushing record in 22. Lol at you.
Well the award nominators are dumbasses too because they put Iowa's O-line up for Joe Moore award.He’s a dumas
Too lazy to do it, but I wonder if win percentage with vs without Doyle is very differentLost that when they fired the best strength coach around.
Do you also see the hits in the backfield? Michigan State, UCLA, Nebraska stopping the run. Granted, Dunker didn’t play against Nebraska.Well the award nominators are dumbasses too because they put Iowa's O-line up for Joe Moore award.
If you can't see holes opened for the guy this season compared to the previous two seasons I don't know what to tell you
I can promise you it’s not.Too lazy to do it, but I wonder if win percentage with vs without Doyle is very different
Yeah I was thinking it would not. There are many ways to gain advantage and win games in a football program. Ferentz is remarkably consistent with different combos of players and coachesI can promise you it’s not.
Doyle was there from 2011-2014 when Iowa went 26-25. OL play has not been dominant or good since the 2000s.
Yes, the OL has been trash since Doyle left, but correlation doesn’t mean causation. The truth is Iowa has put out a bunch of guys (like Plumb) who have no business being on a P5 roster let alone starting. I would also add OL really began regressing after Brian Ferentz stopped being the OL coach. When you factor in how much stronger and faster the defense has been since Doyle left, I don’t think there’s any real cause and effect here as it relates to Doyle.
Yes, Doyle was good. That doesn’t mean S&C completely went to shit after he left. The truth is there have been too many awful weak links on the OL forced into the starting lineup while being taught by a coach (Barnett) whom I am still perplexed by in terms of why he still has a job at the University of Iowa.
That’s bs, our line was above average. If you look at every big run play by Kaleb it starts with a good hole to get him to the second level. The games we struggled running the ball were due to our inability to pass well enough to make teams stop putting 8-9 guys in the box.I’ve said our line sucks, bailed out by KJ2
Yes, I did. And they have nothing to do with the comparison of rush lanes between this season and the previous two.Do you also see the hits in the backfield? Michigan State, UCLA, Nebraska stopping the run. Granted, Dunker didn’t play against Nebraska.
I watched the games and watched DeJong wiff…. Not just pass blocking, but run blocking as well. We had some great moments up front, especially the left side of the line, but too much inconsistency, especially sans Dunker. I said the line was average at run blocking, bad at pass blocking. I also understand the QB ( Cade) can make them look bad.Yes, I did. And they have nothing to do with the comparison of rush lanes between this season and the previous two.
If anything, those games make my point. Kaleb couldn't do crap without rushing lanes.
This is what we've been talking about, is it not? You said the O-line sucked and was bailed out by K2.
Although both compliment each other, lines make backs far more than backs make lines. An O-line can grind consistent yardage with a bad back. Backs cannot grind consistent yardage with bad O-lines.
It's simple numbers and simply it's football. Nothing other than fundamental. And knowledge common to everyone who knows a thing about football.
It's truly incomprehensible to me the amount of people that come onto this board on a daily basis and have virtually no understanding of the game of football. There are literally people who seem to hate the Hawks, do not watch the games, and are on here posting every day. That is something I will never be able to fathom.
To an extent, I can understand the limited knowledge of the game. It is a very complicated game. It is a game that most people never played. And it's hard to see exactly what's happening in the interior of the line from the standard horizontal angle put on tv.
But anybody can see how much the line of scrimmage moves. And anybody can choose to listen to what every football expert has been telling us for 150 years. I mean, watch any post-game interview or any studio segment for two minutes and you're going to hear an expert tell you that the game is won up-front.
It's the essence of football. It's very, very, simple. And it is what allows the layers of complexity in the game to unfold. But all of the complexities are completely secondary.
If you guys ever in your life have the interest to spend two seconds trying to learn football, then remember what I now tell you. FOOTBALL IS WON UP-FRONT.
I'm not trying to be a know it all. Because again, anyone who understands football understands this simple fundamental truth. I'm honestly only trying to help.
Let this truth sink in. Doesn't it feel great to now understand football in this way? Almost like the vault at Fort Knox has been opened before your eyes.
It should be mentioned though, that in addition to the improvement of the O-line this season, Kaleb was also a much improved back
The only post of yours I responded to was post #8 in this thread.I watched the games and watched DeJong wiff…. Not just pass blocking, but run blocking as well. We had some great moments up front, especially the left side of the line, but too much inconsistency, especially sans Dunker. I said the line was average at run blocking, bad at pass blocking. I also understand the QB ( Cade) can make them look bad.
I was wrong to say that. They were average run blockers. Left side better than rightThe only post of yours I responded to was post #8 in this thread.
In that post you claimed that the O-line sucked and was bailed out by K2
This is not at all a good characterization of what happened.I can promise you it’s not.
Doyle was there from 2011-2014 when Iowa went 26-25. OL play has not been dominant or good since the 2000s.
Yes, the OL has been trash since Doyle left, but correlation doesn’t mean causation. The truth is Iowa has put out a bunch of guys (like Plumb) who have no business being on a P5 roster let alone starting. I would also add OL really began regressing after Brian Ferentz stopped being the OL coach. When you factor in how much stronger and faster the defense has been since Doyle left, I don’t think there’s any real cause and effect here as it relates to Doyle.
Yes, Doyle was good. That doesn’t mean S&C completely went to shit after he left. The truth is there have been too many awful weak links on the OL forced into the starting lineup while being taught by a coach (Barnett) whom I am still perplexed by in terms of why he still has a job at the University of Iowa.
Man, you have a lot of time on your hands.This is not at all a good characterization of what happened.
This stuff has been laid out specifically in conversation with you on this board before. I find it hard to believe you never read those posts.
The winning percentage isn't much different without Doyle. But the offensive production is.
The offense was never broken until the O-line was broken. The O-line broke due to a confluence of factors that started during the COVID shutdown.
During that time, Doyle was canned, and young lineman that ended up being forced into duty far too early were missing developmental workouts because of the shutdown.
You are right that in '22 Iowa had O-lineman on the field that had no business playing. But it wasn't because they were all bums. It was because they were underdeveloped.
Iowa was forced to play underdeveloped lineman because of significant attrition to the group at that time. Injuries, early departure for the NFL, retirement from the game, a recruit flipping, transfers (I know at least one guy left because Doyle was gone). All contributed to decimating the O-line that was projected to play at the time.
So again, Iowa was left with a bunch of guys who weren't ready to play. It wasn't just inexperienced players and inexperience as a group. The main hurdle was that these kids weren't yet physically strong enough to get the job done. That isn't a hurdle that gets cleared over night.
You have to realize that Iowa had always employed a strategy of recruiting undersized O-lineman with good feet, with the plan of building them up through a difference-making S&C coach (Doyle). This should all be starting to make a lot of sense to those trying to figure out what happened.
To say the defense has been faster and stronger since Doyle left is simply not true. It should also be noted that Doyle worked exclusively with the O-line in addition to the S&C program that he ran for the whole team.
FYI, the Iowa O-line is no longer "trash". Being that you've admitted to not watching most of the season, it's not surprising that you didn't know that. Here are a couple hints to catch you up. Iowa led the league in rushing and the O-line a semi-finalist for the Joe Moore award.
People on this board have no idea whether Barnett is any good or not. I can tell you that people who are in the know speak very highly of him. And I can also tell you that there isn't an O-line coach alive that can increase the physical strength of his players overnight
I can promise you it’s not.
Doyle was there from 2011-2014 when Iowa went 26-25. OL play has not been dominant or good since the 2000s.
Yes, the OL has been trash since Doyle left, but correlation doesn’t mean causation. The truth is Iowa has put out a bunch of guys (like Plumb) who have no business being on a P5 roster let alone starting. I would also add OL really began regressing after Brian Ferentz stopped being the OL coach. When you factor in how much stronger and faster the defense has been since Doyle left, I don’t think there’s any real cause and effect here as it relates to Doyle.
Yes, Doyle was good. That doesn’t mean S&C completely went to shit after he left. The truth is there have been too many awful weak links on the OL forced into the starting lineup while being taught by a coach (Barnett) whom I am still perplexed by in terms of why he still has a job at the University of Iowa.
Facts.I can promise you it’s not.
Doyle was there from 2011-2014 when Iowa went 26-25. OL play has not been dominant or good since the 2000s.
Yes, the OL has been trash since Doyle left, but correlation doesn’t mean causation. The truth is Iowa has put out a bunch of guys (like Plumb) who have no business being on a P5 roster let alone starting. I would also add OL really began regressing after Brian Ferentz stopped being the OL coach. When you factor in how much stronger and faster the defense has been since Doyle left, I don’t think there’s any real cause and effect here as it relates to Doyle.
Yes, Doyle was good. That doesn’t mean S&C completely went to shit after he left. The truth is there have been too many awful weak links on the OL forced into the starting lineup while being taught by a coach (Barnett) whom I am still perplexed by in terms of why he still has a job at the University of Iowa.
Fair question.Why not start recruiting HS Oxen?
Find HS players that live in the weight room.
Recruit them.
Find ones that can bench press the Titanic and squat the Himalayas.
Find ones that are ALREADY people movers so they can focus on technique at the next level.
I believe this is pretty damn accurate.I agree Doyle was a not the factor.
I would disagree that OL getting worse was caused by BF no longer being OL coach.
The Iowa Offensive line regressed when they replace two NFL level Tackles in Alaric Jackson and Tristin Wirfs with Plumb and a couple other converted guards/young guys. The problems was recruiting-- Brian and Kirk recruited a bunch of projects/lessor athletes and too many guards and not Elite tackle athletes. Alabama flipped two of the best coming out of Iowa, and legacy Alt went to Notre Dame and the secondary OT targets Iowa got were busts. Brian signed off on every OL recruit that led to the bare cupboard, so I don't see how he get's labeled an OL guru when he recruited Plumb and thought Colby/Elsbury could play OT. It's hard to find anything that Brian Ferentz was good at on Offense coaching because in the end he was responsible for the worst offense in P5 football over a two year periiod.
As to Doyle, The story I've read over the years is that when Kirk left the NFL and ended up at Iowa, he brought in an NFL type strength program with Chris Doyle as strength coach. That was revolutionary in year 2000, but well copied by 2010. The Rhabo incident and then Doyle's loose lips sealed his fate, but I don't think Chris Doyle was a difference maker after Rhabo.
This year's OL was much improved. A lot of that is guys getting older/more experienced/stronger an then having an elite RB and also
have an OC that knows what he's doing.
I believe this is pretty damn accurate.
Kirk’s early vision of building a program was top notch. His assistants almost all went on to bigger jobs. They could recruit. Doyle brought in a SC program that’s now been copied by everyone.
Go watch those games from 2000-2005, and it’s a completely different athlete and program. We’ve had a few blips since then, but there was speed EVERYWHERE. And the guys were freaking mean.
What’s changed is Kirk didn’t change. He’s only gotten more stubborn and set in his ways.
Again, there’s been a few moments of bright light success. Overall all tho over the last decade Iowa has been a “hard nose blue collar” program which is a nice way of saying average
Facts.
As for the OL, it’s less about SC and more about talent. Iowa hasn’t brought any in
The significant attrition to the O-line was just referenced in my above post.I agree Doyle was a not the factor.
I would disagree that OL getting worse was caused by BF no longer being OL coach.
The Iowa Offensive line regressed when they replace two NFL level Tackles in Alaric Jackson and Tristin Wirfs with Plumb and a couple other converted guards/young guys. The problems was recruiting-- Brian and Kirk recruited a bunch of projects/lessor athletes and too many guards and not Elite tackle athletes. Alabama flipped two of the best coming out of Iowa, and legacy Alt went to Notre Dame and the secondary OT targets Iowa got were busts. Brian signed off on every OL recruit that led to the bare cupboard, so I don't see how he get's labeled an OL guru when he recruited Plumb and thought Colby/Elsbury could play OT. It's hard to find anything that Brian Ferentz was good at on Offense coaching because in the end he was responsible for the worst offense in P5 football over a two year periiod.
As to Doyle, The story I've read over the years is that when Kirk left the NFL and ended up at Iowa, he brought in an NFL type strength program with Chris Doyle as strength coach. That was revolutionary in year 2000, but well copied by 2010. The Rhabo incident and then Doyle's loose lips sealed his fate, but I don't think Chris Doyle was a difference maker after Rhabo.
This year's OL was much improved. A lot of that is guys getting older/more experienced/stronger an then having an elite RB and also
have an OC that knows what he's doing.