ADVERTISEMENT

Los Angeles On Fire

Stay Mad GIF


Well, when somebody posts something regarding a personal loss you can see I go with the sad emoji, showing empathy. You are so phucked in the head, every single post is a political attack. You sic phuck. You seem a bit angry and obsessed…
It's amazing how much hate you guys hold. It's pretty scary actually.
 
No it doesn't, but this shouldn't be the time. But keep defending your side, outside of attacking Trump it's all you all know how to do.
So why is that area running short of water in the distribution system?
 
Of course she didn't say that's her priority, you retard.

115 out of the 3300 firefighters are women. .035 percent

And of course your retarded news source tries to spin that as the cause of the fire situation in LA. lol
Massive cope. Liberal policies are obviously to blame for yet another catastrophic failure. Good thing they tried to protect that delta smelt population though i guess..
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
Massive cope. Liberal policies are obviously to blame for yet another catastrophic failure. Good thing they tried to protect that delta smelt population though i guess..
Lol, I smell the strategy of avoidance. I'll take your response as tacit agreement with what I posted. Although cowardly, I'm glad you could come around.

The smelt thing was over water for crops in central Cali. Northern Cali has more water but doesn't like to share it because they need it too.

The root of the problem is that a few hundred years ago LA was settled in a goddamn desert that was seeing an unusually plentiful bout of precipitation. Add on climate change and now you have a desert with significant fire threats.

Their infrastructure hasn't caught up to the increased likelihood of fires. I don't know what exactly the fix is. I don't think simply robbing peter to pay paul is a good long term strategy.

You'd have to look at the feasibility of more water storage locally -- which will probably happen now that LA was actually hit by a fire -- through a dam perhaps. You have desalinization, but I'm not sure how far along they are on that.

It's probably like Texas with the power-grid failure during that cold snap a few years back. California finally had a large fire in LA itself.
 
Last edited:
Five people are confirmed dead. That’s pretty good for the scale of these fires and the number of people who refused to evacuate.

I’m curious what mitigation you’d recommend.

I’m sure the death toll will rise but only five so far is remarkable
 
  • Like
Reactions: billanole
Lol, I smell the strategy of avoidance. I'll take your response as tacit agreement with what I posted. Although cowardly, I'm glad you could come around.

The smelt thing was over water for crops in central Cali. Northern Cali has more water but doesn't like to share it because they need it too.

The root of the problem is that a few hundred years ago LA was settled in a goddamn desert that was seeing an unusually plentiful bout of precipitation. Add on climate change and now you have a desert with significant fire threats.

Their infrastructure hasn't caught up to the increased likelihood of fires.
Translation = He won't remotely consider liberal policies and Newsom's lawsuits to stop water coming in from Northern Cali to be sent to Southern Cali have anything to do with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
Translation = He won't remotely consider liberal policies and Newsom's lawsuits to stop water coming in from Northern Cali to be sent to Southern Cali have anything to do with it.
What policies are we talking about? It's probably moreso lack of planning and action than extant policy . LA was hit by an unprecedented fire and didn't have the ability meet the water demand.

You'd A) have to get Northern Cali to share their water, and B) have infrastructure to deliver it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and Kelsers
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT