I’m not sure it is, just Northerncan someone clue me in to why the maga right is defending kim mullkey before the article even comes out?
I’m not sure it is, just Northerncan someone clue me in to why the maga right is defending kim mullkey before the article even comes out?
I’m not sure it is, just Northern
You really are a pile of shit.She beat Iowa. That's all it takes for the simple people of HROT.
The fact the she’s a gutter rat, shouldn’t be up for political debate.i saw clay travis tweeting he was on her side. something is off about this whole thing
Don't you have 114,000 posts?I assume he started it because the internet is where he is important. The internet is where people pay attention to him. I assume it’s because he doesn’t have family or friends, and it gets dull in that 2 bedroom efficiency apartment while waiting for his next shift as a security guard.
Clay Travis. Loli saw clay travis tweeting he was on her side. something is off about this whole thing
It was a fine day.Hey @Bank of Hawk and @Whiskeydeltadeltatango and I played golf together as total strangers last summer.
Whiskey and I could not have more different political opinions on here but a good time was had by all. Politics online is largely not representative of much in real life.
How do you know that? You come off as a complete idiot on here.Well I'm smarter than you are, so of course I'll understand. :-D
That seems to be the rumor but you would think if she was there it would have came out by now. I guess we will see.We will finally get the answers to where Kim Mulkey was on January 6 2021.
She reminds me of a deplorable. She's complete trash of a human.The one thing I'll say about this, sounds like Trump.
That seems to be the rumor but you would think if she was there it would have came out by now. I guess we will see.
No, some MAGA are facist. All MAGA are dumbshits.You're the one who said that only MAGA is fascists, no?
I assume he started it because the internet is where he is important. The internet is where people pay attention to him. I assume it’s because he doesn’t have family or friends, and it gets dull in that 2 bedroom efficiency apartment while waiting for his next shift as a security guard.
Don't you have 114,000 posts?
Not all conservatives are MAGA though too, nor are they all Republican….they are orphansNo, some MAGA are facist. All MAGA are dumbshits.
No. It was way before that.I think I was radicalized the moment the MAGAt scumbags tried their coup Dumb’tat. We needed more to take the Ashli Babbitt dirt nap that day.
No, he is not.You are known as an extreme poster on this board.
Never confuse a conservative with a republican.Not all conservatives are MAGA though too, nor are they all Republican….they are orphans
No, he is not.
No! What's wrong with you?
I made a joke about how Liberty University burning down with Falwell and his people in it would be a good thing for America. The premise of which has been proven right many times over.
That doesn't cover for your violent fascist tendencies.
It was Liberty University, a Falwell MAGA Madrasa. And one could only wish you’d be there at the time.
Northern is Mulkey. It all makes sense now.Yes, outside of Iowa she is universally, famously beloved. You’re such an idiot.
can someone clue me in to why the maga right is defending kim mullkey before the article even comes out?
Northern is Mulkey. It all makes sense now.
This doesn’t excuse Mulkey thoughMulkey is trash for many of the reasons you listed, but I’m not sure I would include Brittney Griner on the list.
Griner disregarded State Department warnings about traveling to Russia and went there as they were in the final stages of mobilizing to invade Ukraine. And she took cannabis oil with her, which she knew was illegal there.
By getting herself arrested she cost the United States its best bargaining chip for prisoner swaps when Biden decided to trade a dangerous arms dealer to get her back while leaving a former US Marine in a Russian prison.
Well if you bought me dinner, maybe.If we all met in person you would all find me to be decidedly charming.
I’m guessing you meant “pro-trans” in sports (but for the record, I’m also pro-proteins as well). Actually, I’m not. I just think that this is an issue better left to the regulating bodies to deal with. You see, I have ACTUAL libertarian beliefs, unlike these shithead ultra-MAGAs that cosplay as “Libertarian”.Proteins in women’s sports, but that’s about the only area ib think you are extreme. Can’t remember you being off the charts on anything else
Agree to disagree on the trans stuff, I just want the ad hominem attacks to stop and actually debate issues on merit.I’m guessing you meant “pro-trans” in sports (but for the record, I’m also pro-proteins as well). Actually, I’m not. I just think that this is an issue better left to the regulating bodies to deal with. You see, I have ACTUAL libertarian beliefs, unlike these shithead ultra-MAGAs that cosplay as “Libertarian”.
I’m blunt and harsh in my rhetoric, and that gets misconstrued as coming from extremist positions, but the Republican Party has gone so far right off the deep end that center-left looks extreme to them.
There are a lot of assumptions being made by KIm's faction.I read (and this may be somewhere in the posts) the WaPo had been working on the story for 2 years and Mulkey declined to be interviewed for the entire time. Then when WaPo notified her they were printing, she did this response.
I think that most people believe that trans athletes participating in sports is not a national issue, but a large faction of the GOP want it to be. It’s a local issue and should be decided locally.Agree to disagree on the trans stuff, I just want the ad hominem attacks to stop and actually debate issues on merit.
I think the consensus is they shouldn’t. Dems will lose voters by pushing back against that narrative, just like Rs will lose b voters over abortion rights.I think that most people believe that trans athletes participating in sports is not a national issue, but a large faction of the GOP want it to be. It’s a local issue and should be decided locally.
I think that most people believe that trans athletes participating in sports is not a national issue, but a large faction of the GOP want it to be. It’s a local issue and should be decided locally.
No, I don’t think it should be. Nor do a I accept your premise that trans athletes marginalize women. If the local jurisdiction finds the competition unfair and institutes the ban, so be it. If the opposite if found, so be it. Not every social issue that the right likes to promote in its quest for power is a national issue.Defeating attempts to marginalize women should absolutely be a national effort.
Again, I have posted this many times, your party continues to make this a national issue and projects this view on Democrats—likely as an excuse to vote for Trump as you have stated.I think the consensus is they shouldn’t. Dems will lose voters by pushing back against that narrative, just like Rs will lose b voters over abortion rights.
The knockout comment was in reference to anyone saying Baylor wasn’t a good institution. Sorry but a good institution doesn’t allow or overlook something like this, And then think any criticism towards it is allowed to be met with violence. The lady has several screws lose. And seems dismissive of the victims. Everyone needs to move on. This isn’t as if it happened a decade ago. The investigation wasn’t even concluded yet.Isn't homophobic and knew Griner was gay when she was recruiting her over 10 years ago:
Griner: Mulkey said keep quiet on sexuality
Former Baylor women's basketball star Brittney Griner says that Kim Mulkey, her college head coach, told players not to be open publically about their sexuality because it would hurt recruiting and look bad for the program.www.espn.com
Defender Baylor as a good institution during the investigation -- her daughter graduated there and she won 500 games -- but the knockout comment wasn't in reference to Briles.
Mulkey comments insensitive to alleged victims
The problem with women's basketball coach Kim Mulkey telling us to "move on" from the story of sexual assault at Baylor is that she overlooks the alleged victims, who are unable to do just that.www.espn.com
They think it’s about Greiner. And if it wasn’t for her. The Post would have never done a story. Of course if it wasn’t for Greiner she would have a couple less Ships as well. Got a feeling it’s mostly to do with how she overlooks certain behaviors in her programs. Be it at Baylor or LSU.Because she’s one of theirs and the facts no longer matter to them?
How about raping them and saying everyone needs to move on. That marginalizing enough for you.Defeating attempts to marginalize women should absolutely be a national effort.
Baylor ignored mThe knockout comment was in reference to anyone saying Baylor wasn’t a good institution. Sorry but a good institution doesn’t allow or overlook something like this, And then think any criticism towards it is allowed to be met with violence. The lady has several screws lose. And seems dismissive of the victims. Everyone needs to move on. This isn’t as if it happened a decade ago. The investigation wasn’t even concluded yet.
They think it’s about Greiner. And if it wasn’t for her. The Post would have never done a story. Of course if it wasn’t for Greiner she would have a couple less Ships as well. Got a feeling it’s mostly to do with how she overlooks certain behaviors in her programs. Be it at Baylor or LSU.