Meh, I don't get worked up like some of you do with Mulkey.
We know you don’t. Of course you don’t.
Meh, I don't get worked up like some of you do with Mulkey.
Not sure she believes it could bring her down, she may be really sensitive about getting attention in the media, particularly negative.There are a lot of assumptions being made by KIm's faction.
I do wonder if this is a profile piece or an expose?
My guess and it's only a guess, is that his is a profile story. Such a story two years in the making by an institution like WAPO, would be a piece that paints a complicated picture. There would be flattering and unflattering topics. She is a successful coach with flaws that make her polarizing.
A Bobby Knight kind of character that people would want to know more about. There are a lot of players that would have taken a bullet for for coach Knight. That may come out as well.
The fact that she seems to believe this story could bring her down is interesting.
Mulky's obvious point was that this isn't all Baylor is about, that she'd feel safe sending her daughters there, and that it was a problem but not representative of the school itself.The knockout comment was in reference to anyone saying Baylor wasn’t a good institution. Sorry but a good institution doesn’t allow or overlook something like this, And then think any criticism towards it is allowed to be met with violence. The lady has several screws lose. And seems dismissive of the victims. Everyone needs to move on. This isn’t as if it happened a decade ago. The investigation wasn’t even concluded yet.
It’s a common sense issue to run with if the other party is wishy washy or pro trans guys in sports. Not many issues in either parties platform has the kind of common sense and support that keeping women’s sports just for women does.Again, I have posted this many times, your party continues to make this a national issue and projects this view on Democrats—likely as an excuse to vote for Trump as you have stated.
Sorry, perhaps not wanting to have excesses of spotlight should be a good deterrent of doing the wrong thing. She‘d have a point if a significant amount of time had passed. But it hadn’t. When institutions reputations are placed above the individual. They have earned every bit of bad press they get. Joe Pa and Sandusky helped improve the lives of thousands of young men. But similar to Baylor that good doesn’t outweigh when they have fallen horribly short of their supposed values.Mulky's obvious point was that this isn't all Baylor is about, that she'd feel safe sending her daughters there, and that it was a problem but not representative of the school itself.
The media has a feeding frenzy on stories like these and gets carried away. It's the excess that's the issue, not the condemnation of the problem.
Again, your platitude has nothing to do with my post. It’s a local issue. Your party is making it a national issue—because you like to pick and choose what are local issues. National legislation is nonsensical.It’s a common sense issue to run with if the other party is wishy washy or pro trans guys in sports. Not many issues in either parties platform has the kind of common sense and support that keeping women’s sports just for women does.
Because they want to win, I’m voting for RFK Jr. anyway. I don’t think civil rights is a local issue, and this is an infringement. If the democrats want to fight against it as party, which it seems they do, it becomes a millstone around the neck of Democrats. Much like abortion for republicansAgain, your platitude has nothing to do with my post. It’s a local issue. Your party is making it a national issue—because you like to pick and choose what are local issues. National legislation is nonsensical.
I get why this is a national issue. It’s easy. Doesn’t take a lot of brain power or empathy.
That’s nonsensical. You have done 0 research on RFK, Jr. or what he stands for or his positionsBecause they want to win, I’m voting for RFK Jr. anyway. I don’t think civil rights is a local issue, and this is an infringement.
So you are throwing away your vote. Got it.Because they want to win, I’m voting for RFK Jr. anyway. I don’t think civil rights is a local issue, and this is an infringement. If the democrats want to fight against it as party, which it seems they do, it becomes a millstone around the neck of Democrats. Much like abortion for republicans
It would end up like a concert in Russia once the alcohol started to flow.There wouldn't be a single punch thrown. And that's a good thing.
Again, your platitude has nothing to do with my post. It’s a local issue. Your party is making it a national issue—because you like to pick and choose what are local issues. National legislation is nonsensical.
I get why this is a national issue. It’s easy. Doesn’t take a lot of brain power or empathy.
As you said- and it makes sense to me- it’s a local issue that the sports governing body could address as it comes up- which seems pretty rare.Again, your platitude has nothing to do with my post. It’s a local issue. Your party is making it a national issue—because you like to pick and choose what are local issues. National legislation is nonsensical.
I get why this is a national issue. It’s easy. Doesn’t take a lot of brain power or empathy.
I didn’t compete in a natural show. I used Test, because I was on TRT anyway. Many if not the majority of contestants in my show used both Test at a higher level, and used compounds i am not willing to use, Tren, Deca, and Winny. I won’t compete in a natural show because it’s cheating.That’s nonsensical. You have done 0 research on RFK, Jr. or what he stands for or his positions
Here…you have stated here that you have competed in body building and you have also stated you have taken steroids and muscle enhancing. You have competed against contestants that are natural. You don’t seem to have a problem with that contest. But you transpose that issue on a local issue involving trans-athletes. Are you steadfast because of the unfair advantage or because it involves transpeople. Because a it appears you don’t mind the chemical advantage.
What is RFK platform on Wall Street regulation?I didn’t compete in a natural show. I used Test, because I was on TRT anyway. Many if not the majority of contestants in my show used both Test at a higher level, and used compounds i am not willing to use, Tren, Deca, and Winny. I won’t compete in a natural show because it’s cheating.
I think RFK is great on Wall Street regulation, environmental regulations, and is moderate on social issues. Consider it a vote against the 2 party system.
What is RFK platform on Wall Street regulation?
have you read that.Election 2024: Latest news, presidential polls, results | USA TODAY
Full coverage, news, analysis and results of the 2024 Presidential Election, as well as races for the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.www.usatoday.com
Scroll down
Why, it’s an embarrassment that the Rs and Dems are presenting us these two candidatesI like @ClarindaA's , but I have to admit I'm embarrassed for him to say he is voting for RFK jr.
Yes, again, in think he’s odd but bright. He won’t win, but in this election, no one doeshave you read that.
But if you are in favor of those policies, ie raising minimum wage, etc. why would you think Biden was not moving your favored agenda forward. He’s addressing student loans and predatory schools, has proposed raising minimum wage numerous times, proposed raising the tax rate and corporate tax rateYes, again, in think he’s odd but bright. He won’t win, but in this election, no one does
Why, it’s an embarrassment that the Rs and Dems are presenting us these two candidates
Border, immigration, healthcareBut if you are in favor of those policies, ie raising minimum wage, etc. why would you think Biden was not moving your favored agenda forward. He’s addressing student loans and predatory schools, has proposed raising minimum wage numerous times, proposed raising the tax rate and corporate tax rate
Interesting…you have expressed on these boards a nativist anti- immigration position whiled Kennedy wants to expand immigration. His health care platform is limited to anti-vax. Thought you claimed to be in favor of vax.Border, immigration, healt
No, just incompetent. They were pretty awful across the board in the first half. What they were, was that they were intimidated by her.She should have been tossed. The officiating crew was on the take.
To be fair - I think she's alot like alot of male athletes where I think you think she's great if she's on your team, and you hate her if she's not.Reese has been dramatic all game, cherry picking, and when MTSU center fouled out on a drama Reese call....she did her waive "bye bye" again.
Also don't understand how anyone finds her attractive.
No, just incompetent. They were pretty awful across the board in the first half. What they were, was that they were intimidated by her.
To be fair - I think she's alot like alot of male athletes where I think you think she's great if she's on your team, and you hate her if she's not.
There's a weird sports double standard going on in women's hoops in general where if Curry, Lebron or whoever does it, people shrug it off...but if a woman does it, it's just awful.
Case in point - remember the OSU postgame - when a charging fan knocked Clark to the ground? people legit claimed she was "selling it" for some reason. Filipkowski for Duke gets knocked down and tweaks his ankle, and everyone blamed the fan.
I think some of that double standard extends to MulkyNo, just incompetent. They were pretty awful across the board in the first half. What they were, was that they were intimidated by her.
To be fair - I think she's alot like alot of male athletes where I think you think she's great if she's on your team, and you hate her if she's not.
There's a weird sports double standard going on in women's hoops in general where if Curry, Lebron or whoever does it, people shrug it off...but if a woman does it, it's just awful.
Case in point - remember the OSU postgame - when a charging fan knocked Clark to the ground? people legit claimed she was "selling it" for some reason. Filipkowski for Duke gets knocked down and tweaks his ankle, and everyone blamed the fan.
I am in favor, but not of mandated covid vaccine, he isn’t going to charge policy anyway, no power to.Interesting…you have expressed on these boards a nativist anti- immigration position whiled Kennedy wants to expand immigration. His health care platform is limited to anti-vax. Thought you claimed to be in favor of vax.
Probably, how she dresses.You ever go to Iowa games. Orther
Stands on the court and screams at refs.
Defended Art Briles and said people critical of him should be “punched in the face”.
Is homophobic and told players at Baylor not to come out. Tried to get a ESPN reporter fired for talking about it.
Turned her back on Brittney Grier when she was held in Russia.
Didn’t want COVID testing during the 2021 Final Four.
Throws players under the bus and never takes accountability for anything.
What do you like about her?
That alone should tell you all you need to know.As someone who doesn't follow basketball, and not all that familiar with Mulkey, it's really telling that it's Northern on one side and others I recognize on the other.
Of course he would and he can change vaccine policy. Nevertheless, his stated policy is to ban all vaccines- he believed vaccines cause autism and other developmental issues. If you are are against that, and his economic policies mirror Biden — why are you going to write in RFKI am in favor, but not of mandated covid vaccine, he isn’t going to charge policy anyway, no power to.
I consider myself a conservative, not a GOP. I agree with this entire post. I don't want any Federal laws allowing it or banning it. Let each state make that decision for themselves.I think that most people believe that trans athletes participating in sports is not a national issue, but a large faction of the GOP want it to be. It’s a local issue and should be decided locally.
To an extent sure. There's alot about her that reminds me of Knight to be honest - both have/had a history of controversial comments/behavior, but got away with alot of it due to on-court success. It eventually caught up with Knight, and imo it will eventually catch up with her as well.I think some of that double standard extends to Mulky
He wants to first stop illegal immigration. Again it’s a vote against the two party system even though you can view it as a throw away vote. If Trump wasn’t a criminal and treasonous cocksucking liar, I would vote for himOf course he would and he can change vaccine policy. Nevertheless, his stated policy is to ban all vaccines- he believed vaccines cause autism and other developmental issues. If you are are against that, and his economic policies mirror Biden — why are you going to write in RFK
Psycho"Reporters who give a megaphone to a one-sided embellished version of things aren’t trying to tell the truth. They’re trying to sell newspapers and feed the click machine. This is exactly why people don’t trust journalists and the media anymore. It’s these kinds of sleazy tactics and hatchet jobs that people are just tired of. I’m fed up."
LSU coach Kim Mulkey threatens to sue The Washington Post over rumored hit piece: 'I'm fed up'
LSU women’s basketball coach Kim Mulkey spoke at length on Saturday about media reports that The Washington Post is planning to run a "hit piece" on her.www.foxnews.com
A true MAGA believer and pos...You ever go to Iowa games. Orther
Stands on the court and screams at refs.
Defended Art Briles and said people critical of him should be “punched in the face”.
Is homophobic and told players at Baylor not to come out. Tried to get a ESPN reporter fired for talking about it.
Turned her back on Brittney Grier when she was held in Russia.
Didn’t want COVID testing during the 2021 Final Four.
Throws players under the bus and never takes accountability for anything.
What do you like about her?