ADVERTISEMENT

Majority say they're open to re-electing Trump

BrunoMars420

HB Legend
Feb 14, 2016
14,490
17,479
113
“A majority of registered voters in a new poll say they would consider voting President Trump into a second term.

Fifty-four percent in the Hill-HarrisX survey released Monday said they would think about voting for Trump, though 46 percent of registered voters said they would not even consider casting a ballot for the president.

The polling was conducted before a summary of special counsel Robert Mueller's conclusions were released. That summary reported that Mueller did not find evidence of collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, a huge win for the president.

People who said they backed Trump in 2016 are likely to back him again.

Ninety-five percent of respondents who said they had picked Trump in his first run for office said they would vote for him again in 2020.

The vast majority of respondents who cast ballots for Trump's former Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, said they would not vote to re-elect him, though a somewhat sizable minority is at least open to the idea.


Seventy-six percent of former Clinton voters said they would "never" vote for Trump but 24 percent said they would at least consider it.

Among people who did not vote in 2016, 65 percent said they would never vote for Trump while 35 percent said they could do so.

The economy was the most popular reason for those willing to vote for Trump. Twenty-two percent of those saying they could vote for Trump cited the economy as their primary reason.

"Clearly the economy is always the issue in every presidential election," Republican pollster Ed Goeas said on Hill.TV's "What America's Thinking" on Monday. "Because that's what it always is. Jobs, the economy, taxes. Basically, do people feel their lives are doing better economically than when that president went in?"

A March 18 CNN-SSRS poll found that 71 percent of Americans believe the country's economy is in good shape. The country's economic state of affairs is the central factor for many election prediction models. Based on current conditions and the fact that presidents usually get re-elected, Trump ought to be a lock in 2020 according to these predictions.

But Trump's highly volatile presidency and his propensity to say things that are unpopular with a majority of Americans could break from the pattern.

"What you really have here is a tossup here, you have basically a statistical tie between the people - the Never Trumpers I'll call them - and the people who say 'yeah, I could find a reason to entertain,'" Mallory Newall, research director at Ipsos Public Affairs, told "What America's Thinking" host Jamal Simmons.

"The economy and employment and jobs is really the only issue right now where the president is still receiving positive marks," she added.

Twenty percent of respondents willing to vote Trump in 2020 said they believed that the current crop of Democratic presidential candidates were too liberal for them. The majority of this group were Republicans, however. Ten percent of Trump-considering respondents said that none of the Democratic candidates were exciting to them.

The president's hard-line immigration positions were cited by 18 percent of respondents open to voting for Trump as their primary reason for thinking about casting a ballot for him.

The latest Hill-HarrisX survey was conducted March 23 and 24 among a statistically representative sample of 1,000 registered voters. It has a sampling margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.

-Matthew Sheffield”

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-ame...f-americans-say-theyre-open-to-the-idea-of-re
 
Never underestimate the stupidity of the American electorate.

This is before the findings of Mueller came out as well.

24% of people that voted for Hilary states that they are open to the idea of voting for Trump.

The Democrats really have to impress in these debates
 
  • Like
Reactions: biggreydogs
I have decided I don't give a s---t now.

I'm upper middle class and white, so Trump is going to be fine for me and my family. If everyone else is cool with rampant corruption and having an amoral, proudly ignorant piece of self-absorbed crap as the figurehead of America, so be it. Maybe it's the leader we deserve.
 
I have decided I don't give a s---t now.

I'm upper middle class and white, so Trump is going to be fine for me and my family. If everyone else is cool with rampant corruption and having an amoral, proudly ignorant piece of self-absorbed crap as the figurehead of America, so be it. Maybe it's the leader we deserve.

If your family includes children, they will suffer from Trump's irresponsible and immoral climate policies bigly!
 
If your family includes children, they will suffer from Trump's irresponsible and immoral climate policies bigly!
Not my problem - I'll be dead.

Hopefully our family will be on the right side of the income disparity ledger and we can rocket off this craphole and leave it to the poors and brown people. That IS the long-range GOP plan, right?
 
I have decided I don't give a s---t now.

I'm upper middle class and white, so Trump is going to be fine for me and my family. If everyone else is cool with rampant corruption and having an amoral, proudly ignorant piece of self-absorbed crap as the figurehead of America, so be it. Maybe it's the leader we deserve.

If the alternative is in favor of more Congressionally unauthorized ‘regime change’ adventures, it’ll be as easy as last time.
 
Any bets on how long cigarette man will be butt hurt over the 2016 election?

anyone who cares at all about the future of our nation and that of the world at large will forever be appalled at the number of treasonous Americans who voted for and support an unqualified and unfit charlatan to be President of the United States. History will not judge them well.
 
anyone who cares at all about the future of our nation and that of the world at large will forever be appalled at the number of treasonous Americans who voted for and support an unqualified and unfit charlatan to be President of the United States. History will no judge them well.

But hey, they owned some libs and got some billionaires some needed tax relief.
 
I predict the democratic nominee will get more votes again. I predict both nominees will get more votes that in 2016. That’s all I got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gimmered
Not my problem - I'll be dead.

Hopefully our family will be on the right side of the income disparity ledger and we can rocket off this craphole and leave it to the poors and brown people. That IS the long-range GOP plan, right?
Rocket to one of those little lights that God put in the sky 6,000 years ago? Not a great plan. ;)
 
I don't put much stock in this kind, but this is an interesting quote:

Seventy-six percent of former Clinton voters said they would "never" vote for Trump but 24 percent said they would at least consider it.
Might this signal moderate Democrats indicating they'd rather vote for "the devil I know" vs. "the devil that will ruin America as we know it?" (Bernie, Kamala, etc.).

Might mean it's Biden or Trump, and those are the two options.
 
Never underestimate the stupidity of the American electorate.

And, never underestimate the stupidity of the stupidity of the Dems for being unable to defeat this buffoon.

Let's float these ideas....
  1. 16 year old voters
  2. No more Electoral College
  3. Free College for everybody

There was an interesting stat in our voting age poll. Those who voted had to indicate if they were Lib, Con or Other.

The last time I looked it was an almost a perfect split of 1/3, 1/3, 1/3.

And for many of us, it's still impossible to embrace Washington and bigger gov.
 
I don't put much stock in this kind, but this is an interesting quote:

Seventy-six percent of former Clinton voters said they would "never" vote for Trump but 24 percent said they would at least consider it.
Might this signal moderate Democrats indicating they'd rather vote for "the devil I know" vs. "the devil that will ruin America as we know it?" (Bernie, Kamala, etc.).

Might mean it's Biden or Trump, and those are the two options.

I kinda doubt it. I still think Bernie would have won the election if he'd gotten the Dem nomination but the political machine made damn sure that would not happen.
 
As I said in another thread, the surest way for the Democrats to blow this is to run as hard as they are from this economy. The vast majority of people are doing pretty well, while the noisiest Democrats are running as if starving people are eating their children in the streets and people are dying for lack of access to antibiotics and aspirin.

70% of people are happy with their health insurance, and 80% are happy with the quality of their health care, and we have candidates vowing to ban private insurance. Unemployment is incredibly low.

There are holes in the system, and things that legitimately need to be fixed, and things Republicans aren't addressing, but the early candidates are running on a "tear it all down" platform that is just incredibly out of touch with most people.

There are plenty of ways to hit Trump where it hurts...a ton of them. Attacking the economy and capitalism as a concept, and running on socialism is just boneheaded.

I have to think that this shifts before the election, but if not...they're going to blow it.
 
And, never underestimate the stupidity of the stupidity of the Dems for being unable to defeat this buffoon.

Let's float these ideas....
  1. 16 year old voters
  2. No more Electoral College
  3. Free College for everybody

There was an interesting stat in our voting age poll. Those who voted had to indicate if they were Lib, Con or Other.

The last time I looked it was an almost a perfect split of 1/3, 1/3, 1/3.

And for many of us, it's still impossible to embrace Washington and bigger gov.
It's not that perfect of a split. The average of party affiliation polls is:
  • 40% Independents
  • 32% Democrats
  • 28% Republicans
Trump will need to heavily win independents again and hope that Dems stay home to be in great shape for 2020.

If he splits indies with the Dems and both parties vote at the same rate, he's in trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericram
Rocket to one of those little lights that God put in the sky 6,000 years ago? Not a great plan. ;)
I'm thinking either Moon or Mars base. Hopefully by the time my as-yet-unborn grandkids are around, technology will be sufficient for self-sustaining colonies. I just hope they don't have to live in the same colony as deplorables.
 
anyone who cares at all about the future of our nation and that of the world at large will forever be appalled at the number of treasonous Americans who voted for and support an unqualified and unfit charlatan to be President of the United States. History will not judge them well.

And how exactly was Obama qualified?
 
tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
This is truly it...in a nutshell. I'm shaking my head sensibly chuckling reading that post. AND THEY ARE SO PROUD OF IT!!!

I'm not a billionaire and I've had tax relief that has helped myself and my family. So yeah I like the Trump tax policy.
 
And how exactly was Obama qualified?
You are asking how a former United Sates Senator who headed up the Harvard Law Review is qualified compared to a draft-dodging real estate fraudster who sold shitty meat and hosted a cable game/reality show?

LO flippin L.
 
You are asking how a former United Sates Senator who headed up the Harvard Law Review is qualified compared to a draft-dodging real estate fraudster who sold shitty meat and hosted a cable game/reality show?

LO flippin L.

Community organizer.

Briefly served in the senate (sort of like Hillary).

Both viewed it as a waiting room.
 
You are asking how a former United Sates Senator who headed up the Harvard Law Review is qualified compared to a draft-dodging real estate fraudster who sold shitty meat and hosted a cable game/reality show?

LO flippin L.

Wow go figure. You've intentionally made ones experience look much better than the others. When the reality is, neither was uniquely qualified honestly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CadetHawk
I have decided I don't give a s---t now.

I'm upper middle class and white, so Trump is going to be fine for me and my family. If everyone else is cool with rampant corruption and having an amoral, proudly ignorant piece of self-absorbed crap as the figurehead of America, so be it. Maybe it's the leader we deserve.

Lol poor
 
Wow go figure. You've intentionally made ones experience look much better than the others. When the reality is, neither was uniquely qualified honestly.
Is either description false?

I guess I never actually TRIED Trump Meat or whatever the F it was called. That was biased.

Let's just leave it as:

1 is an accomplished scholar and politician who served in the U.S. Senate prior to election the other is a shady real estate schlepper with bad shins and a penchant for purveying meat, both literally and figuratively.

Better?
 
I have decided I don't give a s---t now.

I'm upper middle class and white, so Trump is going to be fine for me and my family. If everyone else is cool with rampant corruption and having an amoral, proudly ignorant piece of self-absorbed crap as the figurehead of America, so be it. Maybe it's the leader we deserve.
tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: B_U_C_K_Y
Not my problem - I'll be dead.

Hopefully our family will be on the right side of the income disparity ledger and we can rocket off this craphole and leave it to the poors and brown people. That IS the long-range GOP plan, right?
wGgCAGZ.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: torbee
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT