Narrator: "And, once again, when asked what these 'excellent points' are, LC will simply repeat over and over that the 'eddy nailed it'..."
Might as well send the anti-Trump fanatics closer to the edge
- Thread starter Lone Clone
- Start date
Narrator: "And, once again, when asked what these 'excellent points' are, LC will simply repeat over and over that the 'eddy nailed it'..."
So we're just supposed to guess what you agree and disagree with. It's the same thing from you. You keep posting Trump sided articles and then add a general disclaimer to cover your butt when people call you out. It's the same thing over and over from you. If someone repeatedly posts articles from the KKK but adds the disclaimer "I don't agree with everything", I think most people would come to the conclusion the poster was pro KKK. That's where you're at with Trump. Sorry, but you are what you post.
Why don't you just state the parts that you agree with and that define the reason you are sharing any given article in the first place?
LC...when he finds 'pro-Trump' Op-Eds on the Internets:
Then, posts them here and cannot fathom why no one else is getting boners....
We've been down this road. Many, many, many times.
Mark Penn and Dick Morris are loathesome individuals and the Clintons connection to them is one of many reasons grassroots Dems refused to support her. This article is a heady play by Mark Penn, the Dems don’t want him but if he can get Trumps notice he can take his cash.
I said I agreed with the idea of having the Trump-Mueller conversation on live TV.
Serious question: Do you ever link something with which you are not in 100% agreement?
An entire Op Ed, just for THAT?
FWIW, "live TV" of FBI questioning is a really really bad idea. I'm sure you know that, though.
I do not agree with you. He has done several good things as president -- more, in fact, than I expected. But my expectations were awfully low, so there's that.
Anything that starts with the word "deep state" in the first sentence is not a credible article. Rule number 1 to legitimacy: Do not use terms made up by Alex Jones and Sean Hannity when attempting to sound serious.
Rule number 1A: Don't betray your ignorance by saying Alex Jones and Sean Hannity made up the term "Deep State."
No. I was asked for an example. so I gave an obvious one. I'm in general agreement with most everything in the piece except his conclusion that the Mueller investigation should be halted.
No, I don't "know" that it would be a bad idea to have the interview on live TV. But I'm sure you're willing to enlighten me.
I would think you, of all people, would be delighted to see Trump questioned live, as he's sure to make mistakes and/or tell lies, right there before God and everybody.
First, no. There's acknowledgement that they started investigating foreign infiltration of a major political party and candidate, which, they did not actually acknowledge when it would have mattered. And you think it's more important to investigate Obama's motives for this rather than investigate whether or not Trump is a Russian asset running the White House. That speaks a lot to where your priorities are.
I don't know specifically which right wing propagandist actually made up the term but those were the two that promoted it the most so they get the blame. Of course, your deflection doesn't change the fact that using right wing propagandist terms in the article destroys its credibility.
Which was a joke.
Of course, but I've never linked an article when I didn't fundamentally agree with most of it or at least the primary assertions being made. What main points do you agree with that you think made the article worth sharing?
Find one with an opposite view and post it. I won't be holding my breath.
As I said in another post, I agree with most of what he writes, but not the conclusion that this justifies ending the Mueller investigation. There may be other specific statements with which I disagree. Run a few past me and I'll tell you.
...which explains quite a lot, as most of the piece is non-factual and fluff. You are apparently incapable of understanding that.
One would THINK this would be fairly obvious. Try contemplating it a little harder...
He's been doing that for months. Do you not pay attention?
That's typical liberal bullshit. It's like your people deciding abruptly that "chain migration" was a racist term and calling people racist if they used it.
As far as credibility is concerned, you kinda blew yours all to hell by believing it was started by Alex Jones and Sean Hannity.
Wikopedia is your friend. Use it.
He just said "most of it".
But I've pointed out 2-3 major fallacies and gotten crickets as a response.
I truly think he's just too dumb to understand the counterpoints to the nonsense.
And you simply are unable to carry on a civil, adult conversation if you sense anything in it conflicts with your own opinions and prejudices. You have a disability that causes you to think any opinion different from your own is, by its very difference, untrue. Because of this, you continually confuse fact and opinion.
You shouldn't, so why complain when your Trump defense is pointed out to you?
"Together with Doug Schoen, he was co-founder of the polling firm Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates.,[2] whose clients included political and business leaders such as U.S. PresidentBill Clinton, British Prime MinisterTony Blair, and Bill Gates. Penn later served as chief strategist and pollster to Hillary Clinton in her unsuccessful campaign for the Democratic nomination for the 2008 presidential election.[3] In September 2007, he released a book titled Microtrends: The Small Forces Behind Tomorrow's Big Changes, which examines small trends sweeping the world.[4] Penn is married to Nancy Jacobson, a professional fundraiser.[5] He is currently a visiting lecturer at Harvard College.[6]"
dude is a liberal wet dream
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Penn
Wrong. I posted at least 2 posts, asking you for your positions.
Got nothing.
Then got "I agree with most of it", while "most of it" (which I'd already pointed out) is silly opinions and non-factual.
This doesn't make you a "debater"; it points out that you are "dumb".
Please explain where I'm wrong. If you're talking about my last statement, that's totally true. The KKK and OiT are all in on Trump.
You may think you're posting as a rational adult but you're really not. FYI, OiT thinks he's rational too.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Tim Lester and Jon Budmayr Stop to Watch Jimmy Sullivan Throw
- Latest: Eliot Clough