It’s just you.Much has been said regarding some sort of PSU "secret sauce" in the wrestling workout room, but the eye test between the Iowa Wrestler vs. Michigan and PSU could explain part of the difference we see on the Team Score board, yes? To be totally honest, the 6 PSU finalist all appeared more muscular, more developed neck, shoulders upper chest...to the point of looking larger than most of their opponents. I realize, they are all comply to the weight limit of their respective weight class, but is this just me? Do they do more specialized weight training? Could this eplain some of the difference?
College sports were not created for the fans. They were created to be an extension of and a complimentary addition to an education for the students. Which is why Title IX came about: to make sure the opportunities were balanced between male and female students.
Which is also why claiming they “wasted” money on the women’s team is a terrible take. Not only is the prospect of a world class women’s program a potentially huge win for the men’s team from a university image and marketing perspective, it is literally a requirement.
Welcome to the board. (57 posts?)It’s just you.
Watch the finals again. First three Penn State finalists were far less muscular than there opponents. 184 were even. 197 the only one who was more muscular.
Nice try.