Giving up last years first rounder seems a bit much for a rental. And I personally think Hayden has a chance to be a decent end of rotation or mid reliever
If they can resign him, like the deal though.
Giving up last years first rounder seems a bit much for a rental. And I personally think Hayden has a chance to be a decent end of rotation or mid reliever
If they can resign him, like the deal though.
I think they are close to contending. A decent bullpen last year and they were in
They won 83 games 2 years running and really didn’t lose anyone significant to free agency. Their projections were going to mid 80s wins if they did very little. Now they’ve added a 5 WAR player capable of more (he had more than 4 WAR in only 78 games last year), they’ve cleared dead wood from their bench and a deeper stable of hard-throwing arms in the pen than they’ve ever had. There’s more to do, but I think this move puts them in position to be upper 80s wins and with another good move or two, I could see that 90-92 win projection team we all want to see.If he’s a 5 WAR player that puts the cubs in the mid to upper 80s in wins….should contend in central with Milwaukee taking a step back
I really like this trade all around. Obviously thrilled the Cubs got Tucker, but on the other side, Isaac Paredes goes to a stadium that’s almost literally tailored to his swing and he’s going to thrive. Hayden goes back closer to home and lands with a team that’s among the best at player development, he’s going to have a chance for a fresh start and probably become a really productive reliever. Cam Smith remains a very good prospect and would seem to have a pretty clear path as the heir apparent to Paredes at 3B in Houston.
Don't undersell Hunter Bigge or Ty Johnson. I still consider that trade (for Paredes) to be a disaster, but I'm a lot happier now.For context the Cubs got Tucker for a high profile first round pick at the AA level, Christopher Morel, and Scott Effross.
Trying to get Luis Castillo from Mariners.
I've been promoting the move of Busch back to 3B for quite some time. Now it makes perfect sense (unless the Cubs actually trade Belli, which I hope they don't - I know I'm in the minority).Suzuki trade or DH. Belly to 1B and Busch to 3B? Happ LF, PCA CF, Tucker RF. Very left handed for a Cubs team.
Like I've posted a few times, I'd sure like to see Busch back at 3B. It was the position he played most in AAA and with the Dodgers. I want them to keep Belli and put him at 1B, where he is still excellent defensively and he's much less likely to get hurt again.So apparently Shaw is our starting 3B with the kid they just got from the Tigers in the rule 5 draft as backup there and all over the infield.
Does Triantos make the team to play 2nd if Nico isn't ready to go opening day or gets traded? Canario probably 4th outfielder as I doubt they have Cassie or Alcantara sit on the bench in the bigs. The kids be coming over these next few years they just better sign Tucker and I'm in for it all!
Are we trying to go 5 lefty starters and no lefties in the bullpen?
Think Jesus is one of those classic tease aces as well. Always got an injury or losses some control for awhile.Are we trying to go 5 lefty starters and no lefties in the bullpen?
BTW, who is Owen Cassie?
Why do you think Milwaukee is taking a step back? Adames is a loss, but they just strengthened their rotation, still have the deepest bullpen in the division, getting Yelich back healthy & have a ton of young everyday players that are only getting better.If he’s a 5 WAR player that puts the cubs in the mid to upper 80s in wins….should contend in central with Milwaukee taking a step back
Caissie is an AAA outfielder who hits for power and average. I think he is only 22 or maybe 23 years old.Are we trying to go 5 lefty starters and no lefties in the bullpen?
BTW, who is Owen Cassie?
They need a 3B. Wish Bergman would decide already and get the ball rolling. Too bad Yelich is too selfish to learn 1B. Team would be a heck of a lot better with him there. Milwaukee is an interesting team lots of arms there. A couple could take big jumps. Hall, Ashby, or Miz.Why do you think Milwaukee is taking a step back? Adames is a loss, but they just strengthened their rotation, still have the deepest bullpen in the division, getting Yelich back healthy & have a ton of young everyday players that are only getting better.
Castillo is 32 correct. His K numbers are going down a smidge. Never been a big inng eater every year either. Jesus is plain too risky. Unless it’s a real bargain .I have little-to-no interest in Castillo or Luzardo, especially with the names being thrown around going in return. I’d rather wait and try an almost free reclamation project in Jordan Montgomery.
Yep…I’m all for adding additional starters, but don’t particularly like either. I’d look at adding some free-agents that will be cheaper all the way around than trading for either of those guys.Castillo is 32 correct. His K numbers are going down a smidge. Never been a big inng eater every year either. Jesus is plain too risky. Unless it’s a real bargain .
3/4 like. I'll pass on Luzardo unless there is a player coming with him, preferably a reliever. Castillo is owed $60 million, and his velocity is down 2mph, but he's serviceable. I think Buehler is gettable.Yes, would much rather take my chances with free agent Buehler than give something up for Luzardo or Castillo.
I think Adames and the best closer in the division are big losses. Yelich has a hard time staying healthy. I see them in the 85-88 win range. That being said they seem to always surprise.Why do you think Milwaukee is taking a step back? Adames is a loss, but they just strengthened their rotation, still have the deepest bullpen in the division, getting Yelich back healthy & have a ton of young everyday players that are only getting better.
Williams played a fraction of the season, Megill will close and he was really good in that role, they are set at closer. Replacing Adames’ production will be a big challenge.I think Adames and the best closer in the division are big losses. Yelich has a hard time staying healthy. I see them in the 85-88 win range. That being said they seem to always surprise.
I’ll believe Milwaukee has fallen back when they’ve fallen back. That said, I will most likely underrate them again because I think they lost some pretty big anchors this offseason.I think Adames and the best closer in the division are big losses. Yelich has a hard time staying healthy. I see them in the 85-88 win range. That being said they seem to always surprise.
Think Jesus is one of those classic tease aces as well. Always got an injury or losses some control for awhile.
I guess I'm not a fan of getting rid of Belli. Even if his bat never became quite what it was in '23, they would miss his excellent defense at multiple positions, not to mention his leadership.
Problem is we have 1 extra starter for the OF, DH, and 1B and none of them can play anywhere else so Bellinger is likey to be traded but the prospect better be great if the Cubs are covering half of his salary this year.I guess I'm not a fan of getting rid of Belli. Even if his bat never became quite what it was in '23, they would miss his excellent defense at multiple positions, not to mention his leadership.
Unless the Cubs made more moves to counter this, trading Belli would result in:
I don’t think the Cubs will eat half of the salary remaining on CB’s deal. And, we just don’t know the roster, yet. There are lots of guys out there the Cubs could take a 1 year flier on to back up at 1st or 3rd. Vazquez will certainly be in the mix for several spots. Spitballing, but I imagine Suzuki could stand at 1B and be credible considering he was originally a 3rd baseman. That would be an emergency deal, though.I guess I'm not a fan of getting rid of Belli. Even if his bat never became quite what it was in '23, they would miss his excellent defense at multiple positions, not to mention his leadership.
Unless the Cubs made more moves to counter this, trading Belli would result in:
1) Michael Busch having to play 1B, with literally no one on the team with experience at 1B as a backup (unless Mervis were to suddenly emerge)
2) 4th outfielder being either Suzuki (who has only played RF and rather poorly) or someone with essentially no MLB experience (Canario, Caissie, Alcantara, etc)
3) No third baseman. The only one left on the roster with Major League experience at 3B is Mastro (46 games), who is a fringe Major Leaguer at best. They would be counting on someone currently with no or essentially no Major League experience to step into the role (Vazquez, Shaw, Workman, Triantos, etc).
I guess I don't get it, especially with the talks of the Cubs eating ~1/2 of Belli's salary if a trade were to happen (i.e. it wouldn't be just a salary dump). Yeah, I'd love it if a bunch of rookies stepped into roles and were very successful right away, but I'm not sure that counting on that would be considered a sound strategy....
The fact that the trade isn’t done yet after seeming imminent for 3 days is telling me it may not happen. The Yankees are reportedly pushing for more and more money. The Yankees don’t have a great system and aren’t giving up Jasson Dominguez (their top prospect) for Bellinger, so if they’re not taking a sizeable chunk of the contract, then the Cubs might as well keep Bellinger or trade him somewhere else.The Cubs will pay for Belli to go to the Yanks?
That’s crazy talk.
I can live with kicking in a little money to buy up the return a little, but to the level of like $6-8M, maybe $10M max if you’re getting back a prospect you really like.Whether it’s true, or a rumor Jed is pushing, the Giants are in on Bellinger. I always thought every team that didn’t get Soto would kick the tires on Bellinger. The Cubs shouldn’t eat any money on dealing him. 2 years and $50 million isn’t terrible.
Buying a prospect is fine. Some people are acting like the Cubs MUST trade Bellinger, and they MUST eat half the contract.I can live with kicking in a little money to buy up the return a little, but to the level of like $6-8M, maybe $10M max if you’re getting back a prospect you really like.