ADVERTISEMENT

*******Official Cubs 2025 Thread*******

He’s going to get eviscerated by Chicago sports media Monday.
The Dodgers make $330+ million per season on their TV deal. The Yankees make a piddly little $125 million. I have heard some rational discussions on the Score about this. They don't have a crazy rich owner like Steve Cohen, either. Tom doesn't talk that much in public for a reason, but he isn't a cheap skate. They need Jed to make better deals and stop paying guys to not play baseball.
 
This Kyle Tucker situation is starting to grind my gears. Unless he A.) carries the team to a deep playoff run or B.) signs an extension during the season, this trade might top the Cease/Quintana deal. I still can’t wrap my brain around sending that package to Houston for 1 season of what will likely amount to nothing.
I’m going to let this play out before I make a judgment on the trade. The Cubs have exclusive negotiating rights with Tucker for the next 10 months and I sure hope they take advantage of it. I do agree that if he is not signed beyond this season, it would be considered a major f@ck-up on the Cubs part…
 
I like him but the rumored 4 80 would be 2 much for me. I don't like the idea of elite closer $$ for him.
 
I like him but the rumored 4 80 would be 2 much for me. I don't like the idea of elite closer $$ for him.
I'm good either way. He'd certainly deepen the pen now and the Cubs have the flexibility now and going forward to take it on if they want to.
 
That was fun while it lasted.

JFC. Dodgers be like....
giphy.gif

Cubs be like...
200w.gif
 
Ohtani and Sasaki are being paid next to nothing and they’re still at $375m. Just insane.

I think I’m going to start deferring all my debts until after I’ve died.
Ohtani does actually count as a 46.5M hit against CBT.
 
I think the next CBA fight will be between owner tiers.
It's up to the owners to stop this nonsense. Deferred money is bad for the game, and as a player I'd be leery of it. Oh, sure, supposedly there are safeguards, but to take what amounts to a promise you'll get paid decades down the line is a risk.
The ballooning payroll is bad for the game, too. I don't mind players getting paid, but blowing up like this is going to draw a reaction from the other owners.
 
What happens here if MLB institutes a salary cap?
They aren't doing anything outside of the rules, so I assume there will be a carveout to protect them.
Something has to be done, because they are making a mockery of the luxury tax. So far the parity in baseball has remained strong, and injuries and off years do happen so the Dodgers aren't guaranteed a title, but this is getting ridiculous.
 
The one benefit of Scott signing is he was the guy everyone was waiting on. Assuming Jed wasn't blowing smoke about adding BP help, it will happen soon. Especially with Minter and Leclerc signing this week.
 
The Dodgers are going to make a serious push at the 116 wins record. They practically have the best player in the league at every position. I don't see how this team loses 50+ games....
 
Every team in the NL Central except the Cubs has a murky TV situation. Even the vaunted Cardinals are facing payroll pressure with a substandard TV deal coming off of a season with below average attendance. It's really becoming a league of tiers. As mentioned before, I think there is a fight brewing not just between players and owners when this CBA expires, but between about 3/4 of the owners and the big money owners.
Side note, the A's always seem to sign some decent free agents. They can do that because they know they aren't going to pay them for the full year.
 
1 year deal to avoid going to arb. Multi year deal is 2 ways - Tucker may want Soto $$$ to not get to FA. Long term deal is still possible but I'm not expecting it.

Boyd better than Hendriks, bullpen additions, I like Shaw over Paredes at 3B, Kelly is good co starter at C.

Young talent is a year older and they will most likely spend another 20-30 mil on RP, bench, and maybe another starter.

I really like our chance to win the division - a LOT has to go right for the Cubs and wrong for Dodgers to make the WS though.
As much as I hate “you just have to get in” as an overall team-building strategy, it is true. Dodgers are an absolute juggernaut, but they will have teams they don’t match up as well against, they will have slumps and to make the WS, they WILL have to win a best-of-5 series. Even the 7 game series are shorter and the short series increase variance and things can happen. If I’m in charge, I’m not building my offseason on “hoping” I get in, but once I’m in, there’s a puncher’s chance in any series.
 
It's up to the owners to stop this nonsense. Deferred money is bad for the game, and as a player I'd be leery of it. Oh, sure, supposedly there are safeguards, but to take what amounts to a promise you'll get paid decades down the line is a risk.
The ballooning payroll is bad for the game, too. I don't mind players getting paid, but blowing up like this is going to draw a reaction from the other owners.
Deferred money has a place, but there probably need to be limits on it. As much as everyone mocks the Bonilla deal, it might have saved the Mets after their owner got wiped out in the Madoff ponzi scheme…..but clearly LA is running this to the sharpest part of the bleeding edge.
 
Every team in the NL Central except the Cubs has a murky TV situation. Even the vaunted Cardinals are facing payroll pressure with a substandard TV deal coming off of a season with below average attendance. It's really becoming a league of tiers. As mentioned before, I think there is a fight brewing not just between players and owners when this CBA expires, but between about 3/4 of the owners and the big money owners.
Side note, the A's always seem to sign some decent free agents. They can do that because they know they aren't going to pay them for the full year.
All good points - but the offseason isn’t just FAs, either. The Cubs have added multiple guys via trade, most notably Kyle Tucker.
 
Deferred money has a place, but there probably need to be limits on it. As much as everyone mocks the Bonilla deal, it might have saved the Mets after their owner got wiped out in the Madoff ponzi scheme…..but clearly LA is running this to the sharpest part of the bleeding edge.
Oh, I don’t know. Worst case MLB would have taken over for a bit until someone bought the team. Capitalism would have prevailed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkifann
Dodgers are becoming a fascinating case. They have to clear someone off their 40-man for Yates, but it appears that they have 23 players without minor league options, including 11 pitchers. They do have several guys that will go to the 60-day IL in a few weeks when that window opens up again, but looking forward, they have several really good young arm, but also have Snell, Glasnow, Ohtani, Yamamoto and Sasaki all locked up for several years and some beyond that. It’s going to be really interesting to see what they do with the middle of their roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT