FFS - no, I've NEVER said humans were created from "primordial goo". You're making shit up again. I've said humans evolved from other LIVING organisms. You believe humans were spontaneously created from dirt and then argue against abiogenesis. LOLI say dirt, you say primordial goo, so what? I'm curious what your problem is here? Neither of us can prove our claim we take it on faith by taking other factors into account so it's not like you've got some 'gotcha' here like you think.
You just did.I've NEVER said humans were created from "primordial goo"
I've said humans evolved from other LIVING organisms.
You're such a ****ing liar. SMHYou just did.
Not when you're posting.Does anyone want to explain to Riley the implication of him saying that "humans evolved from other LIVING organisms"?
Is there any intellectual integrity on here at all?
I doubt there are many going to take up your nonsense position to try to save you.Does anyone want to explain to Riley the implication of him saying that "humans evolved from other LIVING organisms"?
Is there any intellectual integrity on here at all?
Where did those other living organisms come from?I doubt there are many going to take up your nonsense position to try to save you.
First person I am putting on ignore.I doubt there are many going to take up your nonsense position to try to save you.
Originally? Abiogenesis. Then millions of years of evolution. Then humans. NOT humans spontaneously from dirt as you have stated.Where did those other living organisms come from?
Get some help.To anyone paying attention Riley doesn't understand that abiogenesis requires primordial goo to work.
What is factually incorrect about that statement?Get some help.
Hell no, The whole con party are followers, not one with an original thought.Can't wait until one of our local GOP morons in the state assembly copies this.
Does the GOP have any good ideas?
I assume everything if it came out of your mouth.What is factually incorrect about that statement?
That's because you're intellectually dishonest and lazy.I assume everything if it came out of your mouth.
You figured out the flaw in your logic yet?I love it when losers have to try to convince others how they are "winning".
According to your definition, yes I am. However, you seem to have a few problems.That's because you're intellectually dishonest and lazy.
You just did.
Listen "Professor", if humans came from other living organisms where did those organisms come from?The idea that you think that was a gotcha is beyond sad.
From similar organism before them. There’s a pretty good fossil record of this if you ever care to check.Listen "Professor", if humans came from other living organisms where did those organisms come from?
Not sure what point you think you're making but abiogenesis is an active area of research. Lots of good resources out there. Educate yourself.Listen "Professor", if humans came from other living organisms where did those organisms come from?
Go back and read mine and Riley's interaction and then explain to him his error in logic.Not sure what point you think you're making but abiogenesis is an active area of research. Lots of good resources out there. Educate yourself.
Listen "Professor", if humans came from other living organisms where did those organisms come from?
You played your role in Riley's and my little drama. Kudos.I actually was a professor, so no insult there.....the rest is moot. Natural selection only explains the origin of new species....not where life came from. So even if we are wrong about the one, it in no way negates the other. The idea you think that tells me you don't really know hardly anything about either.
Lol- you're too stupid to realize he supported everything I've said. Abiogenesis is still being studied. Humans evolved from other living organisms. All widely supported by science.
From similar organism before them. There’s a pretty good fossil record of this if you ever care to check.
Abiogenesis is the study of how life arose from the primordial goo. Therefore you have goo and I have dirt. Neither of us can prove either theory. We BELIEVE we are correct because of other factors. When I say you have goo I'm completely correct and when you try your semantic word games you are lying. Thus endeth the lesson.Lol- you're too stupid to realize he supported everything I've said. Abiogenesis is still being studied. Humans evolved from other living organisms. All widely supported by science.
You're the one who claims humans were made spontaneously from dirt. Non-living substance to human - directly, magically. Explain how that happened and the science behind your assertion.
You're an idiot.Abiogenesis is the study of how life arose from the primordial goo. Therefore you have goo and I have dirt. Neither of us can prove either theory. We BELIEVE we are correct because of other factors. When I say you have goo I'm completely correct and when you try your semantic word games you are lying. Thus endeth the lesson.
NOTHING about "primordial goo".
"the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances"
You're an idiot.
Evolution is a fact. Evolutionary theory explains the mechanisms. Gravity is a fact. Gravitational theory explains the mechanisms.Not as a fact. As one of the possible theories, yes.
LOL...no lesson. The building blocks for life have already been found to exist. The precursors to living cells have already been demonstrated to spontaneously form absent any intervention from a god. At some point in the future, it is not at all unlikely that a very primitive, self-replicationg, self-contained unit of "life" will be created in a lab. Where does your god go then?Abiogenesis is the study of how life arose from the primordial goo. Therefore you have goo and I have dirt. Neither of us can prove either theory. We BELIEVE we are correct because of other factors. When I say you have goo I'm completely correct and when you try your semantic word games you are lying. Thus endeth the lesson.
This is all you guys have: probably, likely, someday. That sir is a belief not a fact.it is not at all unlikely
Natural selection is an observable fact. This is genetic variation of already present genes in the parent animals and nothing more.Evolution is a fact.
Explanations of possible mechanisms are not observations of those mechanisms in practice.Evolutionary theory explains the mechanisms.
What "facts" do you have proving humans were created spontaneously from dirt?This is all you guys have: probably, likely, someday. That sir is a belief not a fact.
Actually we're bantering over the fact that Warrior Poet is completely full of shit.You guys are bantering over an event with no answer or conclusion, at least with human understanding at this point. The beginning of life could be and probably is as simple as a cell forming through an accidental sequencing of chemical compounds.