By what measure is he becoming an "elite" WR recruit? The last time I checked, elite recruits often are offered as FR or SOs in high school ... offered by the likes of the Ohio States and Alabamas of the world.
Oliver's recruitment is blowing up right now - that is without question. Is he overrated or underrated ... we won't know until he steps on the field.
As for there being no comparison ... how is that? They both played DB and WR in high school. They both play in regions that aren't perceived as being on the same "big time" level as the ball played in more populous areas. They both put up comparable numbers at WR.
The primary differences are that Oliver is less slight than VandeBerg ... however, on the flip side, while VandeBerg was a skinny high schooler ... he was also a gamer. The kid was lights-out on both sides of the ball for his team. I don't know the story of Oliver's play on D ... however, since nobody has discussed it, I would venture to guess that it pales in comparison to his play as a WR.
Therein lies the attraction that VandeBerg had in his recruitment ... Iowa traditionally recruits versatile gamers if they cannot land higher, elite-level talent. Such guys project at multiple positions and still provide the Hawks with value no matter where they end up landing.
Don't get me wrong, I have no desire to diminish Oliver's play. However, nor do I wish to overstate it. The kid is clearly a talent ... and I'd like to see him play for the Hawks. However, I won't talk him up at the expense of diminishing what Matt VandeBerg brought to the table.