Lulz.I'm still trying to understand why OP brought this discussion up???
Without Daddy's money he would have been ruined in the 90's which would have ruined any attempt to continue to get by with the "showman" schtick.Thanks for the clarification. I don't think I implied you were anything honestly. I did make statements about the Left though.
I think many others may have been more successful with the money Trump inherited than he. But clearly, he has been successful. I mean he was wealthy before being President and had a TV show. Even then he knew how to be a showman. He just took those skills to the top. So from a whole package standpoint I dont know how one can argue he isnt a model of success in at least a superficial way.
Go ahead and look...Lulz.
How many quotes could I go find about you talking about trump's money?
They are the ones complaining about how much worse off they are financially in the past 4 years. It sounds like close to 100% don't have stocks.Honestly, what percentage of Trump rally goers do you think own stocks? It's certainly not 40%.
You're really a partisan hack, aren't you. At one time I took you for an intelligent poster, but you're just another RW hack. You may know a lot, but you can't seem to analyze what it really means and put it into proper perspective.If you feed the horse it can drag your plow to help you reap more oats.
Meanwhile the commies in China declared war on the sparrow:
The extermination of sparrows – also known as the smash sparrows campaign[1] (Chinese: 打麻雀运动; pinyin: dǎ máquè yùndòng) or the eliminate sparrows campaign (Chinese: 消灭麻雀运动; pinyin: xiāomiè máquè yùndòng) – resulted in severe ecological imbalance, and was one of the causes of the Great Chinese Famine which lasted from 1959 to 1961. In 1960, the campaign against sparrows ended, and bed bugs became an official target.
Someone tell my again why we are voting for these poors?
Well without Kamala schtuping the right people she’d be nowhere as well. Which is worse? I'd suggest the latter.Without Daddy's money he would have been ruined in the 90's which would have ruined any attempt to continue to get by with the "showman" schtick.
Well if it isn't Trump you can guarantee you will be if nothing else.I'd rather have a poor than a Trump.
Strange that Walz doesn’t have ANY stock or bond holdings at his age. Doesn’t he believe in the “American dream”? 😉The Wall Street journal has a pretty in depth look. Walz is kind of an everyday guy with a middle of the road salary and net worth. Vance is a venture capitalist. What doesn’t seem right about it?
I believe it’s been reported that he took high school kids there for school-related trips.Why has walz been to China 20 plus times?