Let's start with this:
She lied about the border.
She lied about Joe's condition.
She has lied about her support for fossil fuels.
Personal finances of Walz and Vance show stark differences
- Thread starter Sullivan
- Start date
Let's start with this:
She lied about the border.
She lied about Joe's condition.
She has lied about her support for fossil fuels.
So you’d never vote for someone who’s lied three times is what you’re saying. Is that accurate?
She claimed that the border was secure, and that she wasn't the border czar. The border is obviously not secure. And the big guy claimed that she was the border czar.
She claimed that Joe's condition was fine, when it was obviously that he was not.
She claims that she is both for and against fossil fuels (depending upon which teleprompter she is reading from).
It's factually incorrect. You can't substantiate your claims.
You're really bad at this.
All of them are factually correct. Schooling you is getting old.
‘Border Czar’ Kamala Harris ‘unburdened’ herself of responsibility to secure the country
Harris has long held responsibility for ending self-inflicted migrant crisis — Americans deserve answers on whether she followed through.
nypost.com
Harris ripped for resurfaced claims praising Biden's fitness amid age concerns: 'Complicit in a coverup'
Vice President Kamala Harris was ripped on social media over the past 24 hours for her many past quotes defending President Biden's mental fitness in light of his move to drop out of the race.
Last edited:
Other posters have picked this apart but…
1) Fred Trump was the successful one, and bailed his son out of trouble, including when his casino(!) was going bankrupt. Becoming a reality TV host on The Apprentice saved his ass. It gave him a vehicle for his one skill: being a loudmouth attention seeker on tv.
2) The manufacturing economy showed we were in recession even before COVID, and his response to that was such a disaster that the economy tanked.
3) His charities were outright frauds. Ridiculous statement by you.
4) You’re getting mad at Walz for having a better retirement plan than a 401k. Hilarious.
They aren't which is why you can't substantiate them.
You schooling anyone? BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Pro tip, he has zero purpose other than to find trivial ways to catch you in a gotcha. Yesterday he spent his afternoon trying to get people to say walz dumb ass had retired as a lower rank, which IS incorrect, by avoiding the fact we had told him multiple times the guy had been demoted after retirement. If youe going to wrestle with that pig, just read what he writes and you will quickly get bored. It's alot of "he didn't not do that" type dumb shit.
Godspeed.
That guy doesn't have a plan to retire. You can make the statement a pension is better than a 401k but Tim walz is functionally poor for a 60 year old.
Dude can't afford to make sure his ass gets wiped for 5 years post retirement in the state he
Now you're starting with making shit up. Maybe that's good as they generally precedes you STFU for a while.
I never once said Walz retired at a lower rank. You are wrong yet again.
Has she been found guilty of sexual assault? That's my personal tie breaker when it comes to which candidate has the higher moral character
I know you didn't, you tried catching myself and someone else in that loop hole as we laughed at your idiocy and continued on.
Youe whole Schtick is to ask someone a question with a false flag in it and then when they casually agree call them an idiot for not noticing the mistake you implanted.
Just post today Riley, it's youe only card, I'll show you as we go.
I've got a rough Idea:
Personal finances of Walz and Vance show stark differences
Personal finances of Walz and Vance show stark differences The major party vice presidential nominees -- Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance -- sharply disagree on a range of issues. The differences in their personal finances are just as stark. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a former teacher...
iowa.forums.rivals.com
You think the National guard pays the big bucks???
He's not an elitist or even close. It will be nice to have someone who doesn't have millions in stocks to at least have a voice in the room.
Lol - you know I didn't yet you said I did. Classic. Lol.
Can't make this shit up. You are the king of the self own.
No, you don't. It's idiotic to think that you do.I've got a rough Idea:
Personal finances of Walz and Vance show stark differences
Personal finances of Walz and Vance show stark differences The major party vice presidential nominees -- Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance -- sharply disagree on a range of issues. The differences in their personal finances are just as stark. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a former teacher...
I think a guy that has had multiple forms of income for several years, and was a white guy born in the 60s, had shit so easy, that's what you guys say right, these old white dudes couldn't fail? Should be sitting on a hwll of a lot more than a million dollars of net worth ( if we give him credit for a 800k pension he doesnt have) at the time of retirement.
He didn't "fail". He just didn't become a multi-millionare. There is a vast difference.
You can count his pension if you want, he's still an ordinary guy who had an ordinary job that doesn't make you rich for most of his life.
Yeah, call me crazy but I'm going to have a hard time thinking a guy that had multiple forms of income and can't afford to retire has some great vision on what society should cap out at.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
Dems run a series of relatively wealthy candidates and MAGA cries “coastal elites”.
Dems pick a middle class dude from Minnesota as a VP candidate and MAGA cries “he is not wealthy enough for an elite position”.
Pick a lane MAGA peeps.
You're the one making the claim you know his complete financial situation.
What is his pension from the military? What is his pension from teaching? What is his pension from Congress? What are his individual retirement account balances? What are his retirement benefits packages for healthcare?
This is another case where you don't know shot but claim you do.
Maybe,.. But I suspect that he has numerous ideas for how the government should move people like him across the financial goal line...
He can afford to retire, he has a pension from the school.
And counting a the national guard pay as "multiple sources of income" is really dumb. If you look up what a Master Sergeant in the National Guard with 24 years of experience it comes out to $14,484.33 a year if they are not activated. (Paid for just the 1 weekend a month, 2 weeks a year training)
That's not a big source of income.
Stay out of the gutters, and chose something closer to the crown in the road...
The guy has had a six-figure income for nearly 20 years. If he can't get across the goal line, that's on him.
You may well be, but you drew an unsupported conclusion as to whether he had sufficient life insurance, assuming from the info in that article that he did not. You don't know the amount of the policy disclosed, and you don't know if he chose to use a cheaper term policy for coverage instead of one that builds cash value. If I were to fill out a financial disclosure form, it would only reflect a small whole life policy that I have; it wouldn't report the $2m term policy that I have to protect my family's interests if I kick the bucket prematurely.
I'd agree that what we know of his financial situation isn't particularly impressive, but I know a lot of people in that same age range who haven't accumulated enough to retire comfortably, either. It's quite common.
Of course it would only reflect the cash value of the policy. That's all that it is worth while you are alive.
If the guy gets put into a nursing home, there is very little value to maintain his care.
I get it, but even if this dude has layers of term policies he is going tonstart timing out of some and it's not like he's getting new ones. And again, we are now down to talking term policy insurance.
