I'm gonna go with Connor McCaffery... I think having him on the court is going to make everyone better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm gonna go with Connor McCaffery... I think having him on the court is going to make everyone better.
Would not doubt it.Hope he hit 3's... Jbo then will have big space in front of him.Shoot 3 at 25ft or pass to Cook or Garza. Lots on Connor. Think he'll handle it well.Sounds like team.But hard hard 'D' pleese.I'm gonna go with Connor McCaffery... I think having him on the court is going to make everyone better.
This in a nutshell. The young man obviously has game, he just can't seem to convince himself.......Isiah needs to decide if he thinks he has the game or not. I think it is that simple. If he confidently steps onto the court and 100% believes he's one of the best players in that game, he could probably be one of them. So far we haven't seen it.
The guy who was not a starter who was playing very well at the end of the year was Kriener. Look at his stats over the last 10 games. Once he recovered from the concussions he was very good. His two big issues early in his career were fouls and turnovers. In the last part of the season these were both way down. .
The guy who was not a starter who was playing very well at the end of the year was Kriener. Look at his stats over the last 10 games. Once he recovered from the concussions he was very good. His two big issues early in his career were fouls and turnovers. In the last part of the season these were both way down. Kriener has ability to score in many ways and is one of the better man to man defenders. One other positive that doesn't get mentioned enough is that Kriener brings an edge that this team needs. Really like seeing Garza and Kriener together. Both can shoot it and have a nack for scoring down low. Really nice high low combination that could be very efficient. If Kriener could work himself into 16-20 minutes a game he could easily be a 8-10 point/game scorer.
Good OP. I agree. Ike Moss was inconsistent but his upside looked great. Like most of the team last year he looked a little lost on defense much of the time. His size and athleticism can fix that problem with hustle and awareness.
I know its chic to hammer Jordan Bo but he's the entire focus of most opponent's perimeter defense. Ike can feast on that scheme because you can't tightly guard Moss and Bohannon without leaving Iowa's talented bigs open even closer to the basket.
Iowa will be one of the highest scoring teams in the nation this season. Even average defense should produce 22-24 wins.
It doesn't take allot of focus to guard JBO with the ball in his hands. Every big ten opponent has a bigger and much more athletic pg defending him.
Pressuring a guy who is smaller yet doesn't have the quickness or strength to get around you isn't difficult at all.
I will respectfully disagree with this second sentence completely. Think back, not long ago to Matt Gatens. Matt was tireless running in the half court off of screen after screen. He had a good shot and consequently was hard to defend while not being overly quick.
You could do the same thing with JB......who arguably has a better shot than Matt did. JB is actually pretty quick laterally. In addition JB has other teammates that could draw more attention than what Matt had. That type of activity wears a defense down. It can get the other team in foul trouble.
He doesn't have to have the ball in his hands all the time....and it will be interesting to see how much differently he is able to play if he is healthy. That foot issue certainly could have affected his quickness.
While I think your point has merit, there is a significant difference in your comparators. Neither guy is fleet of foot. But Gatens is a much bigger guy. Size definitely makes a difference in getting enough room to get a shot off. Gatens could use his bulk/muscle to create an opening. Bohannon, listed at 6' (which means he's more likely 5'10" to 5'11") is not only at a quickness disadvantage but he isn't particularly big/strong.I will respectfully disagree with this second sentence completely. Think back, not long ago to Matt Gatens. Matt was tireless running in the half court off of screen after screen. He had a good shot and consequently was hard to defend while not being overly quick.
You could do the same thing with JB......who arguably has a better shot than Matt did. JB is actually pretty quick laterally. In addition JB has other teammates that could draw more attention than what Matt had. That type of activity wears a defense down. It can get the other team in foul trouble.
He doesn't have to have the ball in his hands all the time....and it will be interesting to see how much differently he is able to play if he is healthy. That foot issue certainly could have affected his quickness.
While I think your point has merit, there is a significant difference in your comparators. Neither guy is fleet of foot. But Gatens is a much bigger guy. Size definitely makes a difference in getting enough room to get a shot off. Gatens could use his bulk/muscle to create an opening. Bohannon, listed at 6' (which means he's more likely 5'10" to 5'11") is not only at a quickness disadvantage but he isn't particularly big/strong.
Ultimately, though, I'd like to see the strategy you suggest be implemented more. And it starts with getting the ball out of Bohannon's hands as the primary ball handler. He's a dead eye shooter and a smart player who appears to be getting the max out of the body and athletic ability he has.
That's what I could see as well. Connor running the offense to keep it flowing and directing traffic with Bohannon constantly moving without the ball to find an opening for a shot.I think with Connor in the mix at point, ball movement will be better and don't be surprised to see JB have a great year. I like the ball in Connor's hands, good quick passer with a real feel for getting his team the ball inthe right places
I will respectfully disagree with this second sentence completely. Think back, not long ago to Matt Gatens. Matt was tireless running in the half court off of screen after screen. He had a good shot and consequently was hard to defend while not being overly quick.
You could do the same thing with JB......who arguably has a better shot than Matt did. JB is actually pretty quick laterally. In addition JB has other teammates that could draw more attention than what Matt had. That type of activity wears a defense down. It can get the other team in foul trouble.
He doesn't have to have the ball in his hands all the time....and it will be interesting to see how much differently he is able to play if he is healthy. That foot issue certainly could have affected his quickness.
While I think your point has merit, there is a significant difference in your comparators. Neither guy is fleet of foot. But Gatens is a much bigger guy. Size definitely makes a difference in getting enough room to get a shot off. Gatens could use his bulk/muscle to create an opening. Bohannon, listed at 6' (which means he's more likely 5'10" to 5'11") is not only at a quickness disadvantage but he isn't particularly big/strong.
Ultimately, though, I'd like to see the strategy you suggest be implemented more. And it starts with getting the ball out of Bohannon's hands as the primary ball handler. He's a dead eye shooter and a smart player who appears to be getting the max out of the body and athletic ability he has.
If Bohannon is easy to guard how has he averaged 12.4 PPG and 5.3 ASST his first 2 seasons at Iowa? Those numbers stack up pretty well at Iowa, and in the B1G.It doesn't take allot of focus to guard JBO with the ball in his hands. Every big ten opponent has a bigger and much more athletic pg defending him.
Pressuring a guy who is smaller yet doesn't have the quickness or strength to get around you isn't difficult at all.
If Bohannon is easy to guard how has he averaged 12.4 PPG and 5.3 ASST his first 2 seasons at Iowa? Those numbers stack up pretty well at Iowa, and in the B1G.
So unless you can break down your opponent, and score consistently off the dribble, a basket doesn't count at 2-3 points. IMO you can be a very good player without creating your own shot off the dribble. Sorry but I'm not convinced Bohannon is not a PG, just because he can't drive to the basket at will. His numbers indicate he's been more than solid his first 2 seasons.Because hes a really good shooter and no matter what you cant stop a guy from getting open looks off lose balls, rebounds, transition ect.
If you cant clearly see how easy it is for opposing pgs to pressure him, and not let him have any good looks off the dribble, and that theres is no special treatment needed I don't think you understand what's happening in front of your face.
I get that.....but Gatens defenders were bigger as well....I think it's relative. I could see a half court offense where our PG, 2G, SF are all running of of screens from the bigs and screening for each other. Hit the open shots and dump the ball down to the bigs when the defense gets flustered and tries to get over or through screens without staying tight on the PF or Center.
That's a different story on the defensive end, I agree. I think we could surprise some people if we get our defense up to an average level. But we have some weapons. Frederick may be an asset. I feel good about this group, at least they have seen where no/soft defense got us last year. Still, we were a young team last year and if they can keep their turnovers down, and make some significant strides in better passing and learn what it is to bear down on defense, we could have an exciting team. Possibly getting into the dance, then maybe even Sweet 16. This will all depend on team will to improve.That's what I could see as well. Connor running the offense to keep it flowing and directing traffic with Bohannon constantly moving without the ball to find an opening for a shot.
Doesn't do much for the issues on the defensive end, however.
So unless you can break down your opponent, and score consistently off the dribble, a basket doesn't count at 2-3 points. IMO you can be a very good player without creating your own shot off the dribble. Sorry but I'm not convinced Bohannon is not a PG, just because he can't drive to the basket at will. His numbers indicate he's been more than solid his first 2 seasons.
Is JB a 2G? The jury is still out on that. I wouldn't mind seeing him play some 2G, just to see if he's being hindered offensively. Unlike many though, I not only think he's a PG, but that by the time he graduates he'll be remembered fondly for his abilities.
Wow....
Ryan Kreiner/Dave Cowens/Willis Reed comparisons. Just when I thought I’d seen everything....LOL
It doesn't take allot of focus to guard JBO with the ball in his hands. Every big ten opponent has a bigger and much more athletic pg defending him.
Pressuring a guy who is smaller yet doesn't have the quickness or strength to get around you isn't difficult at all.
Those great defensive guards must be having some problems. Jordan averages 13.5 ppg, second in the league in assists, first in free throws, fourth in A/TO ratio (differences are within hundreds of a percent), and first in 3 point makes. That is not the profile of an easily guarded player by the usual metrics associated with the position.
It's good you stick to your guns.And yet the fact is that he is easy to guard with the ball in his hands.
It's good you stick to your guns.
Advanced metrics are the big thing in baseball, for a reason, and our HOF coach Lute charted everything. I'm not saying any of us are using advanced metrics, to counter "your eye's", but I know some of our Hawkeye population has a problem giving credit to players that don't match their ideal athlete's. Historically Bohannon's numbers stack up pretty well when compared to players that are easy to appreciate (Lester, and Armstrong), and I challenge anyone to play high level BBall with Plantar Faciitis. I've lived with that, off and on, for about 5 years.
I wouldn't count on a big leap forward in defense, but a finger in the dyke is better than what happened last year. Stop allowing the "freebies". When it looks that easy, it is.