No dipshit, I have been very vocal about my stance. Write the ****ing check to those that deserve it. Make that ****er big enough, one time, that in 10 years there is no more "but we havebeen wrong done by" if your going to write the check, do it and be done and make everything "equal". There is no ****ing point of reperations if in 10 years we are right back to where we are now. Nobody actually wants to do that though because its a lot easier to bitch.
So the beneficiaries of the govt's racist past...RECENT racist past...so much beneficiaries that a typical black family has 5% of the wealth of a typical white family...are going to cry "victim" as the govt tries to address past wrongs? Is that really your problem here?
Some guy he didnt know 10 minutes ago, doesnt ****ing matter, you are impacting someone forthe fault of others and ththaththat is always going to create a victimhood mentality. Feel better?
LOL...you don't think anyone "deserves it" so that's pretty convenient.
Oh, so in order for you to "act like a victim" you have to first "claim to be a victim"? Wow, okay.
FFS, we are all...EVERY ONE OF US...impacted through the fault of others every damn day. Quit whining, victim.
2 things with this:
Well from my perspective...(what a ****ing queef thing to say, we are on a message board, take your tampon out and just ****ing talk)
So what? Somebody is ALWAYS going to claim "victimhood" no matter what is done. You seem to think that it's only an issue when white people make the claim. You should think about that.
The bill in question isn't about "writing a check" so you can dispose of that straw man immediately. I'm not playing.
I'm not the victim of shit dipshit. I'm the asshole saying "lets even the playing field" and let everyone make thier own way not "let'stilt it back theother way to make things even for awhile while not acknowledging the new tilt andthe future considerstions"
The fact they cant see it is annoying me for some reason. Here you have someone, Rudy, who thinks of himself as intelligent and yet he has gone full ****ing dipshit.
For someone not trying to argue the comments posted are extremely dismissive of policies that are universally agreed upon examples of racism historically. How many white people were subject to the fugitive slave act?
Oh...never been cut off in traffic? Never had to wait in line because somebody in front of you is slow as shit? We're all"victims of other's actions every damn day and we bitch incessantly about it so STFU.
LOL. I know you can't spell for shit and your grasp of the English language is tenuous at best but for fvcks sake, proofread your posts.
Ummm...I pointed that out...and pondered why the largest community of black land owners in the entire country was targeted. And if you think their compensation was for the actual value of the land...lol.
No dipshit. It's clearthat this would give pisspants of the future something to point out and act like a victim ass pisspants at that time. Per Trads post regarding the framers and loans, they would have a stance, and that ****ed that in 2021 we are creating this problem.
Keep swinging. You were wrong, this bill is ****ing stupid and will get laughed or sued out of existence.
I read the bill—the main part relevant to this discussion, anyway. Did a little reading on the program the bill references, too. Have you bothered to look at either?
If the bill passes, I’ll bet you any amount you want that it will not be “sued out of existence”.
I love posts like this. It just means I have the free time and I am enjoying the discussion, however perverse the enjoyment might be. Do I seem triggered by how I state my opinions? Or is it simply post frequency that gives you the idea that you are making an objective characterization?
Not going to die on a hill of "sued". No. I will not take that bet, it will not come into existence and will get ransacked in court. Fair win.
I lol at how you are trying to work the "I read it" angle while acknowledging that you have only read some of it. FWIW, I cannot find it in its entirety.
Lol. I read the section that the article provided by OP is referencing in its silly diatribe. I suppose you think I need to read the entire 2700 pages to address the dumbass article? Lol. Dude who can't find the damn thing is laughing at me for, 1) actually reading the relevant part, and 2) being ƒucking transparent and honest in that this is all I read thus far, and 3) demonstrating the willingness to learn more about the ƒucking program the bill references as part of this relevant section.
O well I have ****ing read that much, that's what you were touting? I thought you had read the whole ****ing bill.
I humbly apologize. It was not my intent to create a sense of victimization in you. I was truly concerned about your mental state and the content of your post was...incoherent..
If I recall correctly from my bar review days, this is given the lowest level of scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. Basically SCOTUS has decided the the federal government can pick whomever it wants to give money to
