Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all the injuries, I totally agree on TE being 1.Genuinely curious to see where everyone would rank groups. From best to worst. I'm including the kicking game for fun.
1. TE
2. RB
3. K
4. WR
5. OL
6. QB
Now do the combined score of games against opponents worth a shit.10-4
10-4
😂. That is embarrassingly true.Genuinely curious to see where everyone would rank groups. From best to worst. I'm including the kicking game for fun.
1. TE
2. RB
3. K
4. WR
5. OL
6. QB
FGenuinely curious to see where everyone would rank groups. From best to worst. I'm including the kicking game for fun.
1. TE
2. RB
3. K
4. WR
5. OL
6. QB
It makes him feel good , and deflect away from the fact how shitty the offense was. Could easily be the last 10W season in a long time.What does that have to do with ranking position groups?
The offense impeded the team, the defense and special teams overcame the offense and opponent 10 x10-4
It amazes me that people think you show up and should win. We beat Wisconsin and Iowa State on the road, both solid wins. We beat Northwestern on a neutral site. All three went bowling. We also got hosed against Minnesota, should have been 11 wins.Now do the combined score of games against opponents worth a shit.
I’ll get you started: Iowa zero…. Penn State, Michigan, and Tennessee…..?
Team gameWhat does that have to do with ranking position groups?
Nah. Part of the OL had some signs of quality here and there. The QB position had absolutely no quality whatsoever once DH took over, and frankly, wasn't all that good before that.I'd say that's pretty close. I can see some swapping the QB/OL places.
Would you have been all offended if there were a thread titled "Rank last year's defensive position groups"?Team game
That was not the point.It amazes me that people think you show up and should win.
I don't think last year's unit is even close to top 10 during the KF era but I don't think they look nearly as bad with a better scheme/playcaller either.I still think we do the least possible to help the OL out. Yeah they need to improve don’t get me wrong.
Not offended. That's my primary ranking for them.Would you have been all offended if there were a thread titled "Rank last year's defensive position groups"?
Chill the f out. You don't have to be KF's guardian at every turn.
1. TE (no brainer)Genuinely curious to see where everyone would rank groups. From best to worst. I'm including the kicking game for fun.
1. TE
2. RB
3. K
4. WR
5. OL
6. QB
There are fans of teams a heck of a lot better than Iowa that can rank their position groups without being weird about it.Not offended. That's my primary ranking for them.
My primary ranking for the defensive positional groups is also 10-4.
That's how I look at the game
You guys misinterpret what I'm saying. This point isn't that 10 wins means something. The point is that the team's record is my primary ranking for any positional group. It's a team game and record is the primary stat.There are fans of teams a heck of a lot better than Iowa that can rank their position groups without being weird about it.
Yeah it’s definitely a team game. Is there Anything you can think of that is holding the team up from winning big games right now? Or Vs top opponents?Team game
Team game
I didn't say you were ripping anyone. I just offered my primary assessment for the position groups; which is the team's record.Do you want to do overall position groups? I was just asking a question... I wasn't ripping on anyone. The only think I could possibly have thought of was that some may be curious why Copeland would be fired while the QB analyst promoted and o line coach retained.
1. LB
2. P
3. DL
4. CB
5. TE
6. S
7. RB
8. K
9. WR
10. OL
11. QB
Pretty good ranking. I'd combine S and CB and interchange them with DL. Regardless...the glaring problems with KFz and his approach to offense cannot be ignored. It's not going to get better and sadly it will be the final narrative when he retires.Do you want to do overall position groups? I was just asking a question... I wasn't ripping on anyone. The only thing I could possibly have thought of was that some may be curious why Copeland would be fired while the QB analyst promoted and o line coach retained.
1. LB
2. P
3. DL
4. CB
5. TE
6. S
7. RB
8. K
9. WR
10. OL
11. QB
This group equaled to a 10-4 record.
I didn't say you were ripping anyone. I just offered my primary assessment for the position groups; which is the team's record.
Every game matters.Cool. As long as you also recognize that every position group’s assessment against teams that mattered was 0-92.
No, your weird/delusionary take is pretty clear.You guys misinterpret what I'm saying.
You’re trying way too hard.Every game matters.
In the games you are referring to, my primary assessment for every position group is 0-3.
Again, I'm not making any sort of point about 10 wins. I'm saying that the main assessment I give all team members is the team's record. If the team were 7-5, that would be the main grade I would give to each position group
No, your weird/delusionary take is pretty clear.
Believe what you want. You should be pretty used to being wrongYou’re trying way too hard.
Being a KF apologist is getting tougher and tougher, eh?
No, your weird/delusionary take is pretty clear.