Really. How did des moines do during covid?
des moines, cr, davenport, etc.
Reynolds’ voucher program will cost Iowa taxpayers over $200 million in year two
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
Hmmm… what if your kids are grown and out of public schools? Or you are childless?
And/or any other tax/levy we all pay but don't "use."
Which are tasked with all the special needs kids that cost far more than regular kids.
And the private schools will take NONE of those.
Maybe I’m missing something. What does that have to do with the voucher issue?
Just responding to if your kids are done or no kids.
It has nothing to do with it obviously…
If in iowa take your $$ and ….
What income were those in the 9% tax bracket earning? What was the tax bracket of those in poverty?
I would laugh at you if you weren't so pathetic.
If it was anybody isn’t that a positive?
I think it was over $50k or above - most jobs that someone with a degree would have.
Got it. I’m still curious about Northern’s belief that the tax dollars should follow the kid.
Back to my original comments in this thread, how and when folks like Northern justify money flowing one way is a complete mystery. The concept of a parent getting tax dollars because they make the personal decision to not use the public school and instead enroll in a private school takes some serious mental gymnastics.
Are you asking about "anybody" receiving tax breaks? If so, the answer is no - particularly when you consider that there were no tax breaks for those with low income.
And I am laughing at you for thinking anyone making $50K or above was paying 9% income tax in Iowa. That's as ignorant as your stance on this issue.
Iowa is lowering state tax and at some point, will be a flat tax state. This will encourage people to move into the state especially those living in blue states which tax people to death.
What is your solution to educating children who won't be taken by private schools?
The rate was 9% for income over 50k.
Reason i left iowa during fat chets reign of terror.
1. The private schools are just not equipped to handle them.
2. Their current public schools are the best option.
What’s your point? The Union. Has. Zero. Power.
The Republicans blew it up. We can’t strike. What part of that is so difficult to comprehend??
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Of course you just think the Republican GOVERNMENT has the answers for everything.
No; they are not.
They are legally required to handle them. Unlike the private schools.
As usual, you guess wrong.
It is funny that you're trying to use 35+ year old data to support your current position.
What percentage of children who were in public schools last year will be able to use these funds to attend private school?
So you have no problem with people paying taxes for general education purposes, even if they don’t have children?
