So you have no problem with people paying taxes for general education purposes, even if they don’t have children?
Correct
So you have no problem with people paying taxes for general education purposes, even if they don’t have children?
You if course have proof of this right? Because private schools also can accept students at less than the advertised tuition while also charging the wealthier families more because they have this money as well.No. It. Doesn’t. You’re wrong. I will try again. With the increased tuitions, poor people still can’t afford the private schools. That is fact. Private schools can still keep out the undesirables.
You know those were Brainsdead’s tax rates during Chet’s terms, right?The rate was 9% for income over 50k.
Reason i left iowa during fat chets reign of terror.
What was the tax rate for someone making a $50K salary in 2021?2021 is three years ago.
Just sayin.
How many get in for a discount?You if course have proof of this right? Because private schools also can accept students at less than the advertised tuition while also charging the wealthier families more because they have this money as well.
Stick to pumping balls in gym class.
No idea. It doesn't matter at all. The money follows the student and that is all that matters.How many get in for a discount?
What percentage of vouchers are going to students escaping from bad public schools vs. those who were already enrolled? What percentage of public school students will be able to take advantage of these vouchers?
This demonstrates your ignorance.No idea. It doesn't matter at all. The money follows the student and that is all that matters.
Tell me....what is the admission rate at Grinnell? What is their discounted rate? How many first generation college students do the admit? What is their endowment and how is that spent? Ever heard of the Iowa tuition grant? I assume you are outraged
If their school districts can’t provide good education then the locals can handle.
Program is more for communities where the school unions have taken over.
1. The private schools are just not equipped to handle them.
2. Their current public schools are the best option.
You if course have proof of this right? Because private schools also can accept students at less than the advertised tuition while also charging the wealthier families more because they have this money as well.
How many get in for a discount?
No idea. It doesn't matter at all.
You damn idiot!!!Don't the public-school lobbyists push for increased funding each year?
And you would begrudge some small private schools the same cost increases?
Because “public schools” are charged with educating ALL Iowa citizens who come to their doors. ALL of them. Not a select few or those whose health and mobility are not a question.3.7 billion goes to public schools
Private schools can still keep out the undesirables.
As they should,.. there is a reason why they are called undesirables.
I despise Kim Reynolds and do not support school vouchers, so don’t take my comment as support.Right? We should really round up all those Down Syndrome kids, severely autistic kids, those w/ developmental disabilities and toss them into camps or mental institutions. Keep them and their parents from reproducing again to clean up the gene pool, Amirite???
Some dude back in the 1930s was hip on this, as well.
Not on taxpayer dimes. Basically you’re fine with well off people taking money from the middle class and poor. Grifting from kids who need it. Effing disgusting.As they should,.. there is a reason why they are called undesirables.
Mostly because they don’t have the funding to open a new classroom in a building. We do that IN district. Bus a kid to a different school within because the home building doesn’t have that program.I despise Kim Reynolds and do not support school vouchers, so don’t take my comment as support.
Public schools in Iowa can and do refuse Special Needs kids. I know of one in SW Iowa, but I’m sure there are others. They simply don’t hire the staff and ship them to other school districts. Over the years we’ve had Special Needs kids bussed to our school from this district. I’m pretty sure they have to pay for transportation and I’m guessing their is some additional funds that follow the student.
Other PUBLIC SCHOOL districts.I despise Kim Reynolds and do not support school vouchers, so don’t take my comment as support.
Public schools in Iowa can and do refuse Special Needs kids. I know of one in SW Iowa, but I’m sure there are others. They simply don’t hire the staff and ship them to other school districts.
Not on taxpayer dimes. Basically you’re fine with well off people taking money from the middle class and poor. Grifting from kids who need it. Effing disgusting.
This school has ample money and has a very high tax base. Everyone in this area is aware that this school doesn’t want these kids there. They have the funding.Mostly because they don’t have the funding to open a new classroom in a building. We do that IN district. Bus a kid to a different school within because the home building doesn’t have that program.
If the private school is shitty, they'll close up because no one will go to them. Can't do that in the public schools, they will just keep getting the funding.Because “public schools” are charged with educating ALL Iowa citizens who come to their doors. ALL of them. Not a select few or those whose health and mobility are not a question.
Also, I as a citizen have oversight in my public school. I can even run for tge school board, if I wish. I can control/ influence how my tax dollars are spent by the local school. I have no such control or influence how the local private school is run.
Schools reflect their communities and their values. I have no problem with private schools. I even can justify their role in a community. I do strenuously object to using public tax money to finance these private ventures….ventures that I as a tax payer have no control over what they teach but I am required to support. It’s “bullshit”….If the private school is shitty, they'll close up because no one will go to them. Can't do that in the public schools, they will just keep getting the funding.
Except they do close public schools because if a lack of funding.If the private school is shitty, they'll close up because no one will go to them. Can't do that in the public schools, they will just keep getting the funding.
If the parents sued the district I’m pretty sure they would win. Or at least force the district to pay transportation costs.This school has ample money and has a very high tax base. Everyone in this area is aware that this school doesn’t want these kids there. They have the funding.
LOLBecause “public schools” are charged with educating ALL Iowa citizens who come to their doors. ALL of them. Not a select few or those whose health and mobility are not a question.
Also, I as a citizen have oversight in my public school. I can even run for tge school board, if I wish. I can control/ influence how my tax dollars are spent by the local school. I have no such control or influence how the local private school is run.
If their school districts can’t provide good education then the locals can handle.
Program is more for communities where the school unions have taken over.
School choice should be the law of the land. caring parents deserve to be given a choice where their children get educated and that state should pay the bill for it.I know a guy in IC who has a buddy on the Regina board. It was confirmed they literally hand pick whom gets admitted based on what the parents profession is. Those of us that aren’t stupid already knew how this grift would play out. There is not poor kids all of the sudden attending private school. It is a joke. It has already been studied in other states that implemented it.
You just don’t get it. Schools pick whom they want to admit. No way Regina or other private schools are all of the sudden admitting a bunch of kids from working class/middle class families, especially if they are minorities. Clearly, you are a sucker.School choice should be the law of the land. caring parents deserve to be given a choice where their children get educated and that state should pay the bill for it.
OUR MONEY OUR CHOICE!
I despise Kim Reynolds and do not support school vouchers, so don’t take my comment as support.
Public schools in Iowa can and do refuse Special Needs kids. I know of one in SW Iowa, but I’m sure there are others. They simply don’t hire the staff and ship them to other school districts. Over the years we’ve had Special Needs kids bussed to our school from this district. I’m pretty sure they have to pay for transportation and I’m guessing their is some additional funds that follow the student.
That's called a free market. If you don't like what the product is then you go somewhere else that you do like. IMO, the public schools have forgotten this and wanted to force the community into what the wanted and didn't listen to what the community wanted. With the new program it give the parents the option to pick who educates their children and not the Government. This isn't 1935 Russia and the smaller the Government the better off the USA is.Schools reflect their communities and their values. I have no problem with private schools. I even can justify their role in a community. I do strenuously object to using public tax money to finance these private ventures….ventures that I as a tax payer have no control over what they teach but I am required to support. It’s “bullshit”….
No; it's not.That's called a free market.
Again… I have no problems with private schools. I do have problems with using public tax money to finance them, however. Private schools are independent of state rules and guidelines abs in who they admit abd who they refuse. The public gs “no say” in how they are run/operates. Therefore no “public tax money” should be available to them.That's called a free market. If you don't like what the product is then you go somewhere else that you do like. IMO, the public schools have forgotten this and wanted to force the community into what the wanted and didn't listen to what the community wanted. With the new program it give the parents the option to pick who educates their children and not the Government. This isn't 1935 Russia and the smaller the Government the better off the USA is.
What do you think public schools are??? They are subsidized!No; it's not.
When private schools get to screen who CANNOT attend their schools, it's a subsidized market.
Then you agree with the Government not paying student loan debt off.Again… I have no problems with private schools. I do have problems with using public tax money to finance them, however. Private schools are independent of state rules and guidelines abs in who they admit abd who they refuse. The public gs “no say” in how they are run/operates. Therefore no “public tax money” should be available to them.
What do you think public schools are??? They are subsidized!
Subsidized is putting it mildly. They are 100% funded by taxpayers who are now demanding choice to avoid the hopeless cabal of educational unions and nearly 100% political party capture. CA just sent another message with their latest LAW regarding sexual identification of students at school again dividing parents (taxpayers) and schools (tax recipients). Big, big changes are necessary for local control to again make sense. The federal department of education is a political freak show.What do you think public schools are??? They are subsidized!
Interesting. Don’t you think @Pinehawk ??I know a guy in IC who has a buddy on the Regina board. It was confirmed they literally hand pick whom gets admitted based on what the parents profession is. Those of us that aren’t stupid already knew how this grift would play out. There is not poor kids all of the sudden attending private school. It is a joke. It has already been studied in other states that implemented it.