ADVERTISEMENT

RFK hearing day - So do we want transparency and accountability?

I have read that an enormous amount of Medicaid spending goes to treatment of chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity related conditions.
You’re correct about infant mortality back in the day, but while that has improved dramatically we now have about a third of the country classified as obese.

 
From the 'greatly misinformed and uneducated' folks at Medicaid.gov:

States have the option to charge premiums and to establish out of pocket spending (cost sharing) requirements for Medicaid enrollees. Out of pocket costs may include copayments, coinsurance, deductibles, and other similar charges. Maximum out of pocket costs are limited, but states can impose higher charges for targeted groups of somewhat higher income people.
Well in Iowa it doesn’t. It is a $1 co pay for some drugs. In general the costs are minimal as you posted above. If you can’t handle a $1 you got bigger issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClarindaA's
The biggest issue here is that much of the science that is needed to adequately indicate safety simply doesn't exist. I'd be happy to expand on that, or you can just read through the other thread. That was my initial claim, then you jumped to autism, which is fine but that claim wasn't specifically focusing on autism.
Since you brought up autism though, this publication just came out that we were talking about in another thread:


No it's really not, particularly if you have kids of your own. I wouldn't just blindly trust given how obviously corrupt the pharma industry has become. You should have learned your lesson during COVID that you can't just blindly trust the health authorities / regulatory institutions but I guess you missed that 4 year-long lesson.

See above, and I have (and others) have posted many, many more studies that support my position.
I see you are still pushing that stupid study.

 
Last edited:
I'd be happy if just once one of my senators could speak up without making a total ass of themselves...so much for that...again
 
  • Like
Reactions: uihawk82
I see you are still pushing that stupid study.

"Despite....contradicting decades of rigorous research showing no link between vaccines and autism"

That statement is false. It's anything but rigorous.

Decades of poorly designed fraudulent BS claiming to be settled science is more like it. Once again bunsen, they only studied one vaccine (MMR) and one ingredient (thimerosal) "rigorously", and even that research is flawed. None of the control groups in those studies were completely unvaxxed and none of the test groups in those studies were completely vaxxed, just for starters. The kids in the control group were almost fully vaxxed, in fact. Go see for yourself if there are studies on injected aluminum indicating safety. The science that does exist indicates problems. If you ask for studies that indicate safety here, you'll get either MMR, thimerosal, or a combo of both. Last time I checked there are more ingredients and more vaccines on the schedule.

Then you have the clinical trials for the scheduled vaccines. They are ultra short-term, low powered, and do not use and inert placebo.

It's pointless to argue this stuff right now in a separate thread from the 100 other threads that have already gone over this so many times. Soon (hopefully) we'll all be able to look at the data from the VSD (millions of kids), completely vaxxed vs. completely unvaxxed and we'll see what that data looks like. How about we wait for that data, then come back to this and see who was right?

Anyone who's looked into it can understand the current safety science is terrible. Sorry but anyone who thinks the science is settled on vaccine safety is either lying or has no clue what their talking about and hasn't looked into it for themselves.
 
"Despite....contradicting decades of rigorous research showing no link between vaccines and autism"

That statement is false. It's anything but rigorous.

Decades of poorly designed fraudulent BS claiming to be settled science is more like it. Once again bunsen, they only studied one vaccine (MMR) and one ingredient (thimerosal) "rigorously", and even that research is flawed. None of the control groups in those studies were completely unvaxxed and none of the test groups in those studies were completely vaxxed, just for starters. The kids in the control group were almost fully vaxxed, in fact. Go see for yourself if there are studies on injected aluminum indicating safety. The science that does exist indicates problems. If you ask for studies that indicate safety here, you'll get either MMR, thimerosal, or a combo of both. Last time I checked there are more ingredients and more vaccines on the schedule.

Then you have the clinical trials for the scheduled vaccines. They are ultra short-term, low powered, and do not use and inert placebo.

It's pointless to argue this stuff right now in a separate thread from the 100 other threads that have already gone over this so many times. Soon (hopefully) we'll all be able to look at the data from the VSD (millions of kids), completely vaxxed vs. completely unvaxxed and we'll see what that data looks like. How about we wait for that data, then come back to this and see who was right?

Anyone who's looked into it can understand the current safety science is terrible. Sorry but anyone who thinks the science is settled on vaccine safety is either lying or has no clue what their talking about and hasn't looked into it for themselves.
You claiming studies are poorly designed is rich.
 
You are asking the wrong question. What would the expectancy be if a more healthy approach were used.

M and M's for everyone!
it would be based off the genetics in our gene pool, not the homogenous peoples of okinawa or norway. Yes there are some common sense things we could eliminate but who likes regulation.....
 
You claiming studies are poorly designed is rich.
The CDC was already FOIA'd about this. They were asked to provide any studies of any vaccines given in the first 6 months of life they relied upon to say that vaccines don't cause autism. They could not provide one study that even matched what the request asked for!
 
We have you just ignore it.
Here's what I was referring to. Should be very telling to anyone with a brain:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT