The obligation (as laid out in many state constitutions and as part of the generally agreed on social compact that has existed for over a century) is to provide a uniform system of common public schools within a state.
Vouchers subvert that.
School vouchers scam update
- Thread starter Chishawk1425
- Start date
Vouchers subvert that.
The parents absolutely have a right to choose the source of their children’s education. They also have the right to pay the extra cost for that choice. Use like I have no choice except to find the education of other people’s children they should have no choice except to fund those same schools, even if they don’t send their kids there.
The responsibility of the state is to provide an education to kids, not to provide the exact education every parent wants for their kids.
Private school was an option prior to the vouchers, correct?
You have been proven wrong on all of this since the start...yet here you are gaslighting.
The one that survives,.. I believe I already said that.
Yes. So, what's your point. Now with vouchers it offers families the option to place their child in the private school when they might not have afforded it before. We pay billions in student loans for kids to go to major colleges for a degree that is completely useless after college (Biden keeps forgiving all those loans), what makes this any different?
And it's not my responsibility to pay for people who took out student loans for a degree in something that can't be used in real life after college. But here we are forgiving loans left and right at my tax dollars expense. If I had a choice, I'd rather pay for vouchers for school children than student loans for degrees that people get and never use.
If you want to send your kid to a private school, great. If you can't afford it oh well. That's what public schools are for.
Public schools are there to teach what the parents want their children to learn. Not what the schools think is necessary. That's been forgotten long ago and that's why people want to send them elsewhere.
Actually, there are state standards that teachers must meet. Teachers primarily teach what they always have, reading, language arts, social studies, science, foreign language, math, physical education. What is it parents want their children to learn that isn't being taught?
The right to travel is constitutionally protected. Can I take my road taxes to build my own road or do I have to travel on the roads the state builds? Can I reclaim my funding for the military to equip my own? What are the limits to this of a state passes a law?
Ya, thanks to Bush.. the standards became 1) can you breathe 2) can you spell your name 3) you should have as much sex as you want (there's no consequences for it)
I'm just saying I don't have an issue with this bill. BTW, all those things you mentioned are don with private contractors and only maintained by the state.
Teachers are teaching kids to have as much sex as they want?
It's weird to have a thread in which someone other than Northern is getting beaten like a mule, but, here Pinehawk is day after day.
It's hilarious and frustrating time after time.
All we get is some version of the same response when he continually gets proven wrong: "well too bad, it's law."
His allies are Rico, Northern, and sharky. You'd think that would be embarrassing to any normal person.
Again, I work in school finance. It wouldn't be possible for you to know as much about that subject as me. Sorry.
I suppose he thinks he's trolling, and having a laugh, but he keeps losing bigly.
The Dimms are big time mad that they can't indoctrinate every child anymore.
Considering he disagrees with them on every other topic.
@Pinehawk so far gone he likes RicoSuaves BS. Embarrassing
Correct.
But our complaints center around people wealthy enough to already being able to afford private school getting a subsidy.
Private schools are a choice and they made their choice. Now they're getting a handout.
Wow. Northern seems to have read Ayn Rand. I didn’t see him as much of a reader.
The problem lies with States like Iowa not fully properly funding State Universities and then colleges being forced to raise tuition.
So your argument is apples to oranges.
“Proper service”?
They are offering an education… the same as the private school! That is the “service” being offered. “Proper” is your word to justification the theft that is occurring to the majority of Iowa tax payers.
Translation = he doesn't want to expose his bias by answering the simple yes or no question.
Your post was a "whataboutism".
I just attempted to help you understand why Iowa Republicans pick and choose who to support.
Not my fault you have the attention span of a gnat.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Source Confirms to Rivals, Iowa has been in Contact with General Booty- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
-
-
-