Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prob won't hear from any of the "What about Lynette Woodard" people after this weekend.I get a kick out of the Caitlin haters going WHAT ABOUT PEARL MOORE.. like they cared about it before. Nevermind Caitlin would average about 75 points a game in D2.
CC really does bring out the stupid in people
I’ve been saying the same thing. Right now she is magic and bird. Assuming her star continues to shine in the WNBA, she will need a mega star rival.Too many differences in play (sex of athletes, 3 point scoring, number of games etc) to truly compare the 2 players. But Clark scored the most points at the DI basketball level, and I don't think she should be diminished in any shape or form.
Her true staying power will come if the WNBA has a surge in popularity when she starts playing next season. She could conceivably be the Larry Bird of the WNBA (Not sure who would be the Magic Johnson equivalent). The NBA didn't become the monster it is today until Bird/Magic started the excitement.
Let's check back in a year and see. Then they can put a bronze statue outside Carver, assuming it isn't being done already.I’ve been saying the same thing. Right now she is magic and bird. Assuming her star continues to shine in the WNBA, she will need a mega star rival.
We also live in a world where CC shot a higher percentage, took half the shots, and wasn't effectively playing against cardboard cutouts on D.Maravich only played 3 years with no 3 point line, but whatever.
We live in a world of recency bias
I will defer to Lia Thomas on that.Would Maravich hold the women's record if he had a vagina?
From a social media perspective, it's Angel. From a real player perspective, it could be Juju Watkins. But Angel could very well stay for the COVID year as her draft stock is not looking so great and she is cleaning up at LSUII’ve been saying the same thing. Right now she is magic and bird. Assuming her star continues to shine in the WNBA, she will need a mega star rival.
There's your "asterisk"....If she didn’t lose about 8 games that were cancelled due to Covid, she’d be well over 4000 by the time she’s done.
From a the standpoint of having a similar game, I’m going with ionescu.From a social media perspective, it's Angel. From a real player perspective, it could be Juju Watkins. But Angel could very well stay for the COVID year as her draft stock is not looking so great and she is cleaning up at LSUI
She's possibly the biggest name in the WNBA right now. A Clark vs Ionescu finals would be a big draw.
I would think it was obviously the 3-point line in place when Brown did the chart.Which 3 point line - the old one or where they shoot from now?
3-point line history, explained: Why NCAA rules were different for Pete Maravich, Lynette Woodard's scoring records | Sporting News
As Iowa superstar Caitlin Clark uses her 3-point prowess to rewrite the record books, learn more about the history of the shot in the college game.www.sportingnews.com
Definitely Sabrina. She's the biggest name in women's hoops not named Clark. I have a hard time seeing Reese being too successful in the WNBA. First, everyone has size and athleticism so she will need to develop some skills. Her shot is terrible and very inconsistent... no threat beyond about 8-ft. She won't be able to just power shots up over smaller defenders like she often does in college. If I'm her... I'm coming back.
Which was 2.5 feet closer, invalidating his analysis.I would think it was obviously the 3-point line in place when Brown did the chart.
Please don’t insult my intelligence by telling me Pete and Caitlan’s “records” are comparable in any way other than on paper. A very different game has evolved in the past 50 years, the 3 point shot being a major difference. I also believe thT #22 (and all women) have improved the quality of their game with a smaller ball.Hell no. Rules change. And if Clark took 40 shots a game like Pete did, she’d probably be around 5,000 points by now. Works both ways.
In ten years, the people who care about it most will be the little girls inspired now who will be in college then attempting to break it.In another ten years, will anyone give 2 shits? Including her?
The smaller ball is a legitimate point. Hard to quantify what difference it would make, just like it is impossible to know how Pete would have performed in a desegregated SEC.Please don’t insult my intelligence by telling me Pete and Caitlan’s “records” are comparable in any way other than on paper. A very different game has evolved in the past 50 years, the 3 point shot being a major difference. I also believe thT #22 (and all women) have improved the quality of their game with a smaller ball.
Now, please don’t think I am down-playing any accomplishments and records by women in basketball, I am not. But, the game they play and the game the men play are two different games, at their levels of competition and defy “comparison” in this manner.
But then Pete did pretty well in a desegregated NBA.The smaller ball is a legitimate point. Hard to quantify what difference it would make, just like it is impossible to know how Pete would have performed in a desegregated SEC.
Agreed. But as prolific scoring as he was in college playing against all white boys while his dad let him jack up 40+ shots a game?But then Pete did pretty well in a desegregated NBA.
You kind of lost me at "beyond the arch."Pistol Pete had no 3 point line. In true fairness it would be interesting if they were to take all his shots from beyond the arch and convert them into 2 and see apples to apples who would really be the leader.
But not without reason....Maravich was a unique and special talent...a basketball savant. Pete and Larry Bird might be the two best white guys to ever lace’m up. Bird was surrounded with talent as a professional....Pete, not so much.Agreed. But as prolific scoring as he was in college playing against all white boys while his dad let him jack up 40+ shots a game?
Is that what people should inspire to be? Why not academics? Basketball, the be all, end all?In ten years, the people who care about it most will be the little girls inspired now who will be in college then attempting to break it.
Maybe Pete suffered from plantar fasciitis?You kind of lost me at "beyond the arch."
And I am not saying Pete wasn’t amazing. I only tend to return fire when people drone on about no three point line and playing only 3 seasons, as there are major advantages he had which Clark does not.But not without reason....Maravich was a unique and special talent...a basketball savant. Pete and Larry Bird might be the two best white guys to ever lace’m up. Bird was surrounded with talent as a professional....Pete, not so much.
I keep waiting for someone who brings up Sam "Rim-Raker" McGee who was the 6 time scoring champion of the YMCA junior-high/senior high basketball league or some crap like that. It's the NCAA record. Were there other leagues? Of course. But given the different circumstances it is hard to compare them to what is going on now. Just be respective that those people were the best in those leagues, probably would have been successful in the NCAA too, but it isn't an NCAA record that Clark is breaking (or not breaking) there. We don't compare stats from the NFL and the UFL (or whatever it is going to be next year) either.I get a kick out of the Caitlin haters going WHAT ABOUT PEARL MOORE.. like they cared about it before. Nevermind Caitlin would average about 75 points a game in D2.
CC really does bring out the stupid in people
Why are the concepts mutually exclusive? You asked who will care. I gave you an answer.Is that what people should inspire to be? Why not academics? Basketball, the be all, end all?
I wonder if the little girl traveling basketball leagues will now be full of girls forcing ugly 3 point shots constantly?In ten years, the people who care about it most will be the little girls inspired now who will be in college then attempting to break it.
Oh for sure, if they are not already. But, I think Steph already poisoned that well, just like Jordan poisoned the well for millions of mildly athletic boys jumping without first knowing what they were going to do with the ball. Doesn’t work as well when you don’t have a 48 inch vert.I wonder if the little girl traveling basketball leagues will now be full of girls forcing ugly 3 point shots constantly?
Steph Curry changed the game, I think Clark will definitely change the way girls approach the girls game also. Shooting bombs isn’t just for guys anymore.
This. Both were/are amazing and GOAT for College MB/WB respectively. No need to rip Pete for playing in a "whiter league" or being a ball hog because he was the best player (by far) on the court. He was a wizard. Go watch some video highlights. They both loved to throw up some long bombs.I’m a no. Both were great in different ways. Pete took more shots and shot more FTs than Caitlin did, 3-point line or no. Pete also played in a still partly segregated SEC.
We are so, so good at tearing things apart. Let them both be great and this is really nothing more than who scored the most points in NCAA history. If this was “just” a 4 yr/3-point line thing, the record wouldn’t have stood for 54 years.
That is just more NCAA stupidity. Woodard played at KANSAS…it was just before NCAA oversaw women’s hoops. It’s baffling to me that the NCAA didn’t just pick up that history….but whatever.Prob won't hear from any of the "What about Lynette Woodard" people after this weekend.
He didn't average 40.But then Pete did pretty well in a desegregated NBA.
It's not but the balance is horribly tilted.Why are the concepts mutually exclusive? You asked who will care. I gave you an answer.
Is it? By high school, most people realistically know where they stand with athletics, and focus there. It all seemed pretty balanced to me as my son went through high school, and many athletes were also excellent students.It's not but the balance is horribly tilted.
It’s been said he also waited to shoot a layup for others to foul him so he could complete the 3 point play. Was he cherry picking?Agreed. But as prolific scoring as he was in college playing against all white boys while his dad let him jack up 40+ shots a game?